Quote:
Originally Posted by forex savior
What's up with you WhipSaw? You taking the same steroids as Barry Bonds? Like others who cannot effectively rebut my arguments you instead resort to smearing the messenger. It didn't work before, it won't work now.
|
Smear campaign, you've got that wrong. I've just posted quotes to interesting material I found on other forums which you have posted the exact same preprepared material on. Aparently trying to smear the smaller firms with the false suggestions / allegations that they are close to insolvency/bankruptcy.
Steroids ? Well, its funny you should say that because you sure are putting a lot of effort into your smear campaign against all the small forex companies.
I have made some very good points with reference to Refco on the OANDA forum. The net capital requirements wouldnt have helped in the case of the only significant bankruptcie to hit the forex market in its entire history, so how is tightening the net capital requirements going to help it now ... Thats right, its not, its simply going to move funds to the bigger operators who infact are more likely to be hit by insolvency if Refco is anything to go by.
In anycase, I also raised another important point by pointing out your posting the same material on every available forum:
Whats your motivation or payoff for your 'smear' campaign against the smaller firms all over the internet ?
Are you paid to do this ?
Why have you never posted before under these identities on these forums ?
You have made a number of mistakes, in your posts where you suggest that these smaller firms are going bankrupt. Case in point, particularly being "I TRADE FX" - Your first post stated that they were close to bankruptcy with a -$3M net capital, now they have +$4M net capital. Your posts have no doubt cost them business, when they are clearly experiencing dynamic growth.
I also pointed out on the OANDA forum that the Net capital requirements have historically been very dynamic, with OANDA's number fluctuating by over $30M over the past year. When they are clearly not in any way concievable having any problems. I'll put the post from OANDA in the next post of mine here.