Great, can’t wait to see your ideas. I have mainly been using the 1hr and 15 min. charts. Every once in a while I’ll peak at a 4 hour chart to see the trend.
Have a good weekend all! May next week bring more wins!
Thanks daedalus for that perspective.
Before I was thinking…wow look at that long swing… when at the end of it, and figuring it had a long way to pull back to 61.8, so I would try a counter trend trade, only to get stopped out, or, figuring it was too soon to enter back in the trend as it may pull back on a second try, and then loose out.
Now looking at it this way, it would seem “more probable” that it won’t pullback as much (so not to trade during the pullback), and to enter at the 23 or 38 is not too late after all (I tend to chicken out when it trends past 0 ;)).
So do I sound like I know what I’m talking about yet :rolleyes:, if not, pls set me straight :o
I have no idea what you just said. 
That being said, I think i’ve got something that you’ll like for entering around the 23.6 levels for shallow pullbacks!
looking forward to reading your updates
Shallow Pullbacks: The other 50% of Forex Action!
You know just as well as I do if you’ve done any of your own backtesting with this method of trading - there are lots, probably more “shallow pullbacks” out there in forex land than there are “deep pullbacks”. A deep pullback would be the first part of this method, basically anything that retraced back to or beyond the 61.8% lines (61.8, 75/76.8, and 87). A shallow pullback can be defined by a retracement back into the 38% to 50% channel, BUT NOT FURTHER than 50%.
Image 1: The illustrated difference between a shallow pullback and a deep pullback.
So why do we want to know this? Because we like money - and the more money the better! Basically I got tired of having to sit and watch upwards of 60% of the retracements in these markets fail to make it back to the 61.8% levels so I could trade them. So this method is meant to capture the rest of those pullbacks out there that were previously out of the confines of our method.
Image 2: This should illustrate my point. Look at all of the shallow pullbacks out there in these markets. This is a chart of the last week in the EURUSD. Now granted not all of these moves would’ve have been tradeable by the new shallow pullback method - BUT this is merely to push home my point. Shallow pullbacks are a common place in this market. Now we just have to come up with a way to capture a high probability, high odds setup to enter them. Easier said than done!
I’ve spent a couple weeks backtesting this and digging through charts to find a way to maximize profitability, reduce our risk, and keep our risk:reward in a very favorable fashion. I can successfully report back that these pullbacks work on ALL time frames, ALL markets, and will realize an INITIAL 1 Risk : 1.7+ Reward if used correctly. But that doesn’t tell the whole story. The risk : reward ratio is actually higher than that because that initial risk is only taken on by you, the trader, for the first 1/3 of the move. After which, the stop is moved up to b/e and your risk removed down to ZERO for the remaining 2/3’s of the trade. THIS IS ACTUALLY A BETTER RISK:REWARD SETUP THAN THE DEEP PULLBACKS!!!
Enough fluff. Lets get onto the entries.
Image 3: I tried to use some timeframe charts since 95% of you guys out there reading this do. So we have a EURUSD 60 minute chart. First rule, obviously you trade with the trend just as you did in the other deep pullback method. MA lines define that trend. No change there. So lets walk ourselves through this entry.
You can see on the 29th the EURUSD enters our trade channel between 38.2% and 50% but does not go further than 50%. On that same candle it closes up outside the 23.6% value of our grid. We wait for the next candle to confirm and also close above the candle. Then we enter at the 23.6% level. You can use a limit order for this entry as we want to get in AT 23.6% to keep our risk:reward appropriate. Allow up to 5-8 bars to get filled on your order. IF THE MOVE DOES NOT FILL YOU AND HITS THE SWING HIGH/LOW LEVEL (0.00%) WITHOUT YOU IN THE TRADE IT BECOMES A NULL AND VOID ENTRY ON A PULLBACK TO THE 23.6% LEVEL AND IS NOT AN ENTRY.
So you get filled at 23.6%. Your initial stop is at 45%. You move your stop to breakeven as soon as 10% is hit. You take profit at the -10% level. Simple, easy, and requires almost nothing from you to manage the trade. You can just use OCO’s and go to sleep. And trust me - that will increase your profitability. The greatest weakness of a trader is himself, not his method. Remove yourself and let your method protect you and make you money. Thats what it was built for!
Image 4: Just another example trade good for 61 pips.
So… The stats are this: After a random drag back through the charts on 6 different pairs, 4 different time frames, and 15 different trades…
80% of Trades hit their target at -10%
13% of Trades stopped out for max loss at 45%
7% of Trades stopped out at Break Even
87% of Trades allowed entry at the precise 23.6% level.
87% of Trades allowed you to move your stop up to Break Even.
I’m sure in real life the results will be less than that, but I think it should give you a pretty good indicator of possible performance. And like anything else, you need to backtest and mock trade these setups yourself. Don’t take my word for it, look at the results yourself and let me know.
I think this addition to our method can capture an insane amount of pips previously untouched by our method. And it can do so in a way that is slightly more profitable than the deep pullback method and with a bit less risk.
Hope this helps!
Cheers!
Very Informative, as usual! Do we move to break even once price action crosses the 10% line or once it closes above it?
Once it crosses.
just did a quick scan of various charts, and im liking this a lot…it seems to work well.
Are you also using any different confirmation from other indicators when playing the small pullbacks.
This is my favorite system! I’ve tried quite a few! I started using this system playing the 38.2,50.0 and 61.8 pullbacks. My reason was the wait, I guess. I see more oppurtunities at those levels. I just make sure the stoch. is in line with what I’m wanting to do.
The win percentage of these small pullbacks is amazing! I didn’t think it would be that high.
Good work daedalus! I hope you gain many pips!!
I’m not personally, typically since this is more of a “breakout” method the stoch is already going to be in line with the move by the time you get confirmation. There is no reason why you can’t however. If you want to use stochastics as a confirmation of trend continuation, whatever, go for it!
There are more oppritunities at these levels and the win %'s seem to be very high. I’m actually very suprised by it as well. Actually what i’m more suprised is how well the intial stop level (45%), break even level (10%), and take profit level (-10%) work together with price action. I’ve never seen so many swings stop at a price level (-10%) before. And if i’m honest, those are values I pulled out of thin air to try and get more profits out of a swing, protect us sooner, and keep our initial risk:reward in line. But i’m astounded at how well they all seem to work together.
Cheers!
what if the candle that retraces from say the 50% level closes outside the 23% level do i still enter the trade?
If i understand you correctly, yes you do.
Which pairs are you guys mainly trading. Today was not a good day for me. Lesson learned.
Hope you guys had a better day than I did. Better trades tomorrow!
This was my trade yesterday. There was also a legitimate trade down from the earlier high in the morning but I was at work
Why did you have to post that!! I was going to take that trade too but I went with the USD/JPY instead. Set my stop a bit too low, and got stopped out.:rolleyes: But you live and learn. Today I’m already up 40 pips.
Thanks for sharing that Tony. I’ll post a pic of my LOSING trade. LOL.
I got in at the first red arrow. Price didn’t quite make it to my take profit, then shot back up, as I headed to work to stop me out.
I’ve got a quick question.
Should you stick to the bigger grid with larger timeframes. Or draw new grids at new swing highs/lows?
For instance, do you have a higher probability sticking to the highest of highs and lowest of lows on the screen at that time? Or should you play new grids. I will attach 2 examples. #1 will be the most recent swing low/high on the chart. #2 will be the lowest low and highest high that you can see at that point in time on the chart.
What I am asking might not can be answered, I don’t know. There might not be a way to justify if that particular trade has a high probability or not. Just thought I would throw it out there.
I’m more of the first screen shot example, I play the “active” swings. But I think its also relative to the time frame. Your second screenshot may very well be the “active” swing on a 4 hour chart. So both grids are in fact important, but I think they come in to play in different time frames.
I gotcha! Thanks alot daedalus!
Yes I agree with Daedalus. Though depending on your entry trigger the potential rewards are much bigger on the larger grids. Two nice opportunities yesterday. Had to be a bit nimble for the GU as it barrelled down post news but the difference in retails suggested a move might be short lived and against the prevailing trend at the time. With CAD 2 potential entry opportunities. For me only the second is really legitimate as the first occurring during the Asian session is too far out of the tradeable timezone for this pair
