Quote:
Originally Posted by AndreasF
Tonymand
maybe I should have written more clearly before hitting the send-button.
I am fully aware that a sample size of 2 days is not enough to get sufficient statistical proof for or against a system
We also know that no system can promise always and steady gains- we don't live in a perfect market and there are too many uncontrollable factors involved.
PIPology's approach however is straight and logical by using basic simple indicators, which at least in my limited view and knowledge appeares to have a higher probability of winning trades against losing trades.
Andreas
|
Fair enough, and thats the point Andreas. There are many people on the site who have little idea and who dont seem to get the importance of testing and reliability in different markets. Its rather painful to watch them lose their money and lament about what happened. Glad you are not in that boat and wish you well with the trading
__________________
Tony
"What we think we know is anchored only in our assumptions, not in the bedrock of truth itself, and that world we seek to understand remains always on the horizons of our thoughts" - George Kelly (1977)
|