Quote:
Originally Posted by rhodytrader
More specifically, you either have to win bigger than you lose or you have to win more frequently and you lose.
Of course doing both is preferred.  |
These two things taken together are not possible in roulette.
It does not require an extensive mathematical background to look at the 38 identically sized spaces on an American roulette wheel (note the 35-1 payoff on a single number) and conclude that the game is unbeatable.
With a 1/38 chance of having a number come up on the next spin and the 35-1 payoff, it is easy to calculate the often quoted expectancy of the player of -5.26.
The unbeatability of the roulette wheel is based on the mechanical perfection of the wheel - such a conclusion is based on the assumption that the ball has an equal chance of landing in each pocket.
There is only one way to beat roulette and that is by using a visual ballistic or mechanical system. A mathematical progressive system will always fail because of the above.
The website for the worlds's formost authority on visual ballistics is given below.
I have mastered this system myself and it really works and professionals use it to make large sums of money.
But it is nevertheless, gambling and so I do not use it.
AdvantagePlayer.com: Roulette - Hosted by Laurence Scott