That is totally understandable and entirely natural!
But, you know, it is surprisingly just a difficult on the other side of the fence! It is one thing to be responsible for one’s own trading, but entirely something else to manage others! It is a huge challenge to guide others but simultaneously granting them sufficient room to grow individually and at the same time restricting their risk of damage. A simple limit on position exposure is never sufficient.
I think you have shown very many talents in your trading journey so far and you already possess enormous experience and knowledge about trading.
I think, if anything, you may be too early in placing so much importance on results. Results wont produce the method, but the method will produce the results.
Everyone starts somewhere and most people start from small beginnings. It is only once the knowledge and experience can be combined with confidence and the beautiful expression: a “positive expectancy” that one should start to focus on the reality of the possible returns.
There are so many factors that make up one’s trading profile and they need to be logically identified and arranged and quantified. For example, trading style (fundamental v. technical or a hybrid of the two), time frame (weeks, days, hours, etc) position size, risk per trade, which markets, etc, etc.
You already possess the knowledge to create all that. Personally, all I think you need to add is a model that tells you if the rest of the trading community is currently thinking the same way. If not, bow to the greater knowledge. if so, then just “go with the flow” Typically things like 200 SMA etc,etc.
Interestingly, this is precisely what I am currently doing with Turbo’s high 5. It is an attractive idea but I am not at all familiar with longer term, breakout methods and I am looking at how I can make it work for me within my own criteria. You have the talent and the intelligence - just don’t look for results before the process. Just a personal opinion, as always, friend!