Crude Oil and oil markets

Hi Jazzman!
I have absorbed the same information, yes. Apparently, crude stocks rise whilst some refineries shut down for maintenance before starting to produce the summer gasoline, which then draws on the crude stocks.

This effect has been somewhat diluted by the extensive shift to low-consumption vehicles, and will be further reduced if the summers continue to be abnormally warm.

But these are fairly routine events and well anticipated in the markets.

If you have not traded oil before then be careful (demo, maybe?) because moves can be swift and contrary. One has to leave plenty of breathing space for spiky movements. This is readily apparent if you look at, for example, an hourly chart and note the length of the candle wicks relative to the bodies.

How are you looking to trade this? I guess with CFD’s? Futures are an expensive way to learn but nice once we get to that level of confidence! :smiley: CFD’s though usually have a nasty spread and we must take that into account when judging the position of stops and targets - also how much to look for to make the trade risk worth while, e.g. not much point in looking for a 10-pip move if you have to give 5 pips to the broker…

I’ll come back about the charting, in the meantime here are some interesting thought that I found today…

The morning presented two good down moves, but now the hourly has turned neutral and I am done for today, unless something significant happens…

I am more and more inclined to think that we are entering a period of volatile, whippy trading as we approach price levels that many seem to consider close to realistic lows. So I am only looking for quick trades on a strictly intraday basis.

In the meantime…:

[I][U]OPEC has matured and is no longer the same cartel that it used to be[/U][/I] - at least, according to an article in FUTURES magazine! The old style of cheating and bickering is now replaced with a sense of cooperation and organisation that, after the weekend compliance meeting in Kuwait, is now very likely to agree to an effective extension to their period of output reductions.

Compliance with the current cuts is now at 94% and even Russia is now in line with its targets. And, apparently, most of OPEC and non-OPEC nations are now supportive of a further 6-month extension.
Whilst the current production cuts have not so far resulted in underpinning prices as intended, it is incredibly successful from the compliance point of view. The only reason why prices were not supported was the record U.S. inventories that were countering a large portion of the cuts in supply. So we can assume any extension will be equally well complied with by all parties.

However, if the cuts are extended during the second half of this year we may well see a very different result. US inventories are soon expected to start showing draws instead of builds as the summer approaches and there have already been declines in inventories in other parts of the globe including the Far East.

If we start to see US drawdowns, as well as increased demand on a global basis, coincident with OPEC/NOPEC cuts, then the overall scenario might suddenly be looking in the other direction…

Interesting!

The current OPEC compliance is unusual - I remember well the “cheating and bickering” - I wonder how long it will last?

BTW, I’ll be demoing (with CFDs) but only briefly whilst observing market behavior, looking at the indicators and assessing the reliability of signals. I do like to trade with a funded account (with the minimum financial risk possible of course, don’t we all?) because I just can’t not be aware that demo trading ‘isn’t real’, and discipline slips because ‘it doesn’t matter’ and because ‘I’m experimenting’. It’s also a bit like paddling in your wellies.

The JMMC is the Joint OPEC/Non-OPEC Ministerial Monitoring Committee. It was established following OPEC’s 171st Ministerial Conference Decision of 30 November 2016, and the subsequent Declaration of Cooperation made at the Joint OPEC/Non-OPEC Ministerial Meeting, held on 10 December 2016.

The JMMC met for the first time in Vienna on January 22. And the meeting in Kuwait City last weekend was only its second meeting.

The JMMC also involves a Joint Technical sub-Committee (JTC) that provides the research and data for the JMMC.

If the current level of compliance is anything to go by, it seems to have some credibility! They just might be saying “watch this space…”


Following on from the earlier post, the hourly chart shows where the price went neutral last night as it moved above the ribbons (which I now affectionately call the “pipelines” :smiley: ). The MACD also crossed to declare the day’s down side over.

Indeed, overnight the market has edged higher and WTI now back around $48 area.


I guess the only significant factor is what the market didn’t do yesterday in its thin trading. If we look again at that daily channel (I prefer to draw lines connecting the candle bodies rather than the wicks, but that’s just a personal preference, I am not a great channel person anyway), then we see that the hourly chart penetrated the support line considerably but the day’s close was back above it. To me, that suggests a weakening of the selling pressures around this level, especially since we are still clearly below the daily 200MA which is apparently widely watched.


Seems to me that the whole world (at least us oily rags in it) are watching little else than the US inventories:

  • Later today we have the API’s Weekly Statistical Bulletin (WSB), covering the total U.S. and regional data relating to refinery operations and the production of the four major petroleum products: motor gasoline, kerosene jet fuel, distillate, and residual fuel oil.

  • Tomorrow, we have the EIA’s weekly report of Crude Oil stockpiles, measuring the change in the number of barrels in stock of crude oil and its derivates.

Iran (now the Islamic Republic of Iran) is one of the world’s oldest continuous major civilizations, with a population of over 78 million. Oil was first discovered in Iran in 1908 leading to the formation of the London-based Anglo-Persian Oil Company.

Later, in the 1950’s, the National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC) was formed. After the Islamic Revolution of 1978–79, the NIOC took control of Iran’s petroleum industry and all exploration, production, sale, and export of oil is administered by the Ministry of Petroleum.

Iran is one of the founder members of OPEC. Its proven oil reserves are approximately 158 billion barrels, which is roughly 10% of the world’s total proven petroleum reserves and about 13 percent of OPEC’s, placing it in third position behind Venezuela and Saudi Arabia. When taken together with its holding of 15% of the world’s gas reserves, Iran is considered an energy superpower.

Iran produces about 3 million bpd, of which around 1 million bpd are exported. Iranian production peaked at around 6 million barrels per day in 1974, but it has been unable to reach that level since the 1979 Iranian Revolution due to a combination of political unrest, war with Iraq, limited investment, and US sanctions. The industry was disrupted by the international embargo from July 2012 through January 2016.


Oil proceeds represent about 18% of GDP. The oil and gas sector account for about 60 percent of total government revenues and 80% of the annual value of exports and foreign currency earnings.

Interestingly, Iran manufactures 60–70% of its industrial equipment domestically, including various turbines, pumps, catalysts, refineries, oil tankers, drilling rigs, offshore platforms, towers, pipes, and exploration instruments.



Petrochemical Complexes in Asaluyeh

Follow up on this morning’s charts.

Already last night, the charts were showing an end to the current selling pressures ahead of the latest inventory releases today and tomorrow. That trend has continued today with a slow but steady move up to the daily 200 MA. without any kink in the ribbons or the MACD at all.

Kind of gives a feeling of short covering rather than new longs. I have not traded at all today even though a buy would have brought a good 50-tick move. But it did build a lot more trust into this chart set-up :slight_smile:

Now that the price is caught in the very tight range between the 200 MA above it and the channel base below it, we can expect a good move once one or other breaks on the day’s close - probably as a result of one or other (or both) of the inventories data releases.


MOSCOW (Reuters) - Russia and Iran have pledged to continue efforts to rein in oil production and stabilize markets, the presidents of both countries said in a joint statement on Tuesday.

“Russia and Iran will continue cooperation in this sphere (in oil output cuts) in order to stabilize the global energy market and ensure stable economic growth,” the statement from Russian President Vladimir Putin and Iranian counterpart Hassan Rouhani said.

They two presidents met in the Kremlin.

Earlier on Tuesday Iranian Oil Minister Bijan Zanganeh told reporters in Moscow that a global deal is likely to be extended, but time was needed to discuss the subject thoroughly.

“It seems that most of the OPEC and non-OPEC (countries) are going to extend the agreement, but time is needed to evaluate the situation and to have face-to-face meetings and discussions with others,” Zanganeh said.


Do you accept it as factual that oil is a fossil fuel, Manxx, or do you have any time for the alternative views of Thomas Gold and others?

Interesting topic, Lexy, thanks!
I had not heard of these abiogenic theories before and I will read more about them and reply later. But from a brief glance, it would seem that there is no requirement to accept as factual or otherwise either argument concerning the origin of hydrocarbons [U]as long as they only relate to the historic formation[/U] of oil and gas deposits - it is purely a matter of academic interest.

On the other hand, if these alternative theories may also have a [U]current [/U]relevance then it would be a different matter entirely. E.g. if they affected whether and how synthetic fuels could be produced. Also, in a more futuristic sense, whether one could anticipated a certainty of oil and gas on other planets, then it would also be [I]extremely [/I]interesting - maybe we should already get in first and stake our claims on the moon surface…:slight_smile:

The American Petroleum Institute (API) US crude oil inventories release revealed a build of 1.91 mill barrels, which was very close to the predicted 2mill barrels. Prices were therefore little affected and have remained at the same levels in early trading this morning. One interesting observation from API data is that stock level increases are occuring during a period of increasing petroleum deliveries indicating that demand is also increasing simultaneously with the stock builds.

Here is an API chart showing Crude Oil stock accumulations this year


The daily chart is still sitting squeezed between the 200MA above it and the channel baseline below. The hourly chart is still postive/neutral.

Daily + ribbon


Hourly


The market will probably now wait for the EIA Crude Oil Inventories to be released later today. If there is significant deviation from the expected 1.183 mill barrels then we will have the impetus to push decisively one way or the other.

In addition to the Russian/Iran comments regarding the likelihood of an extension to the OPEC deal, yesterday also saw some other interesting events:

  • In Libya, the continuing internal civil struggles caused a sudden drop in oil supplies from various terminals, reducing production figures by 250,000 bpd. This added a further upward poke to price movements.

  • Perhaps the most interesting development was President Donald Trump’s executive order on energy independence which reverses many significant directives designed to protect people and the environment. This has produced intense responses both for and against and I will post something about this later today…

BTW…

I should also add that the short oil trade using the Turbo “high 5” method closed out at the high from 23.3. at 48.45. The trade started on 23.2. at a price of 52.52 producing a handsome reward of +407 ticks. :slight_smile:

Well done Turbo… :slight_smile:

Every coin has two sides and this executive order seems to have two very extreme sides, both of which will have far-reaching implications on energy and the environment:

American Petroleum Institute

The API President and CEO Jack Gerard called President Trump’s “Energy Independence” executive order an important step forward in restoring common sense regulations that are needed to advance the U.S. energy renaissance.

“Today’s action by President Trump is an important step toward increasing American competitiveness and recognizing that our industry is part of the solution to advancing U.S. economic and national security goals,” said Gerard. “Smart, common sense and science-based guidance and regulations will help our nation’s energy renaissance continue to provide benefits for American consumers, workers and the environment.”

“We look forward to working with the Trump administration and Congress on forward-looking energy policies that will help ensure the United States continues leading the world in the production and refining of oil and natural gas, and in the reduction of carbon emissions."

API is the only national trade association representing all facets of the oil and natural gas industry, which supports 9.8 million U.S. jobs and 8 percent of the U.S. economy.

API | API welcomes the Trump administration’s executive order on Energy Independence

National Parks Conservation Association

Mark Wenzler Senior Vice President of Conservation Programs writes:

President Donald Trump’s new executive order on energy independence ignores one of the worst threats facing our nation and puts Americans, our communities and our beloved public lands in jeopardy.

The sweeping executive order, released today, aims to reverse decades of work that protects people and the environment, including our national parks, from the perils of climate change. Masked as a directive to reduce dependence on energy from other countries, this order directs the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and other agencies to rewrite or eliminate critical safeguards for our air, water and climate. Under this new order:

• The Department of the Interior must review and may repeal safety and enforcement standards, known as “9B rules,” that protect more than 40 national parks from the impacts of oil and gas drilling inside their boundaries, including Everglades, Grand Teton and Mesa Verde.
• The EPA must withdraw and rewrite rules that mandate power plants limit carbon dioxide
• The attorney general must stop defending certain measures that would reduce coal plant pollution
• Various agencies may no longer consider the effects of climate change when deciding whether to issue permits for fossil fuel production
• The EPA and Bureau of Land Management (BLM) must put on hold standards for reducing methane pollution from oil and gas operations

The consequences of the executive order are real for our national parks. Already, climate change is dramatically affecting the places Americans cherish, rapidly melting the glaciers at Glacier National Park, driving Joshua trees out of Joshua Tree National Park, and causing sea-level rise that threatens coastal national parks from Acadia to the Everglades.

By reversing sensible policies for reducing climate change, the Trump administration is harming the environment in ways that can affect our communities for generations.

The executive order directs EPA and other agencies to review the policies and practices that could impede the expansion or production of fossil fuel-based energy and report back to the administration. This tasks the agencies responsible for protecting our environment and parks with creating a sweeping account of anything that might restrict or slow down fossil fuel development. The executive order does not give any consideration to the economic, public health and environmental benefits of reducing greenhouse gas pollution or the value of preserving public lands.

Trump’s executive action dramatically halts American progress to combat climate change in ways that can wreak havoc on our people and harm our national parks for generations to come. This reckless action ignores public opinion, science and the needs of communities, and may ultimately leave our children and grandchildren with a more volatile and dangerous future.

We have a responsibility to protect each other and our invaluable natural and cultural heritage. This executive order neglects the real effects climate change has on our nation and tosses the responsibility to deal with the consequences onto the shoulders of future generations.


Sunset over St. Mary Lake at Glacier National Park. The namesake glaciers at this park are rapidly melting as a result of climate change. In 1850, the region had 150 glaciers. There are now just 25 left. Photo © Kan1234/Dreamstime.

Jazzman, I tried to send you a PM about this, but you do not have sufficient posts yet.

The EIA release revealed:

[I]- Crude oil inventories rose 0.9 million barrels in the March 24 week to 534.0 million.

  • But product inventories declined again and more substantially, with gasoline down 3.7 million barrels to 239.7 million, 1.2 percent below the year ago level, and distillates down 2.5 million barrels to 152.9 million, for a year-on-year decrease of 5.1 percent.

  • Crude oil imports averaged 8.2 million barrels per day, down by 83,000 barrels per day from the prior week. Over the last 4 weeks, imports averaged over 8.0 million barrels per day, 0.7 percent more than in the same period last year.

  • Refineries operated at 89.3 percent of their operable capacity, up 1.9 percentage points from the previous week. Production also increased, averaging over 10.0 million barrels per day for gasoline and 4.9 million barrels per day for distillates.

  • On the demand side, total products supplied over the last 4 weeks averaged 19.6 million barrels per day, up 0.7 percent from the same period last year.
    [/I]

The positive note in the market since last night has continued but the reaction to the slightly lower than expected build in crude oil stocks has been fairly muted.

The increase in crude inventories was offset by reductions in product inventories. Production increased but so did demand.

On balance? I don’t really see in these figures anything to suggest a significant move one way or the other! We still seem to be fulfilling the anticipated oscillating in a broad range. I am interested to see if we close the day above that daily 200MA. I have a resistance level around 49.60 but I am still cautious of the upside potential right now, especially as we approach some hourly highs from March 16th and 23rd… but oil seems to have an ability to continue in the same direction for long periods even when the move is slow. Lets see what the daily looks like tomorrow!.


Prices held their gains overnight following the EIA release yesterday and established their hold above the daily 200 MA. The short-term resistance around 49.60 held overnight but is typically seeing some negation already this morning.

The hourly is still positive and only showed a brief dip into the (green) mantle prior to the release yesterday, which did nothing to cancel the underlying bullish tone at that time.

The 15m is also still holding a positive position with its (grey) mantle above the 1H (green) mantle. And I will keep a positive view on price until this turns down.

But the daily, whilst showing signs of a near-term upward turn (bounce off the channel baseline, close over the 200MA, and crossover of the ribbon), still suggests the upside is limited whilst trading below the (green) mantle. I would expect to see considerable resistance appearing as (or if) we approach the $50 level. And any spikes above that could maybe extend to 50.20-50.40 region.

Having only started trading oil seriously this month, I have realised that nearly 100% of my trades have so far been sells (rather obviously!) and I wonder whether that is causing a psychological reluctance to buy anything even when the charts (correctly) have shown a rise in price…or maybe it is just the natural extreme caution with handling something new! :slight_smile: It has been a positive month and I would like to see it end that way.

HOURLY


15M


DAILY


I read an interesting article this morning about DUCs no, not the 3 DUC(K)s! DUCs are Drilled but UnCompleted wells. There has been an increase over some years now, since the low point in oil prices, in the number of drilled shale oil wells in the WTI area that have been left idle but are ready to be brought into use at very short notice.

Two principal reasons for this are that 1) since their output is finite, there is no sense in selling oil at low prices when the price will rise later, and 2) land leases are relatively short-term and require drilling activity (but not necessarily production) in order to qualify for rollover renewals upon expiry. Since acreage prices are high it makes sense to drill even though there is no intention to produce immediately.

However, this means there is potential for a rapid increase in production as soon as prices reach viable levels. The article suggests this could be as much as 300,000 bpd potential additional supply overhanging the market.


Whilst actual positions may be strictly based on the technical picture from the charts, I do think it wise to keep an interest in what is actually happening in one’s market in addition to just watching the price movement and the lines.

It gives a broader perspective on why the charts look as they do, increased assurance to take (and maybe hold) positions, and creates a greater general interest in the subject matter itself.

Whilst I have been reluctant at present to take long positions in oil after the recent falls, in spite of the charts confirming the rise, there are growing reasonings being stated that justify going long. For example:

  • Futures net longs have been largely liquidated (relieving downward pressures)

  • OPEC/NOPEC’s strong compliance with agreed production cuts shows a strong commitment to its eventual effectiveness in supporting prices

  • Growing belief that the current production cuts will be extended to the end of the year

  • The impact of OPEC cuts only just starting to appear in lower inventories (typical 2-3 month lag)

  • Exaggerated concentration on growth in US oil inventories which is not being reflected in other regions

  • The impact of increased refinery activity after seasonal maintenance periods resulting in draws on inventory levels

  • Anticipated increasing demands globally and strong US economy

In addition to these factors it occurs to me that US oil producers do not over-produce simply to fill up the storage facilities, and they certainly do not over-produce in order to pull down prices! If they expected a prolonged period of weak prices then they would be shutting down facilities, not increasing. But the number of new rigs appearing is increasing significantly and there is already even pressure to find sufficient service companies to operate them.

So if we combine this current US situation with the Trump administration energy goals then we could see:

  • a healthy, active US energy sector based on good returns and reasonable consumer price levels

  • a healthy level of employment in all US energy sectors

  • a diversion of the production exceeding domestic demand towards reducing imports and even raising exports.

  • the reduced US imports of oil from, e.g. OPEC being diverted to other consumers such as the Far East rather than depressing prices.

So, on balance, there is a sound scenario for anticipating an upwards move from the current price levels. However, this is not to say that that we should expect a rampant bull market instead. Maybe the matured and cooperative OPEC style is more likely to result in a stable and healthy level of inventories and a price level suitably positioned between the interest of suppliers and consumers.

However, with the US, Russia, OPEC, African producers, North Sea and many other producer countries, all with their own geopolitical and economic considerations, I wouldn’t expect a stable condition to last very long…

…which brings us right back to the start. Just put all the above considerations into the melting pot and then watch what spills out onto your charts and just go with the flow…:slight_smile:


…and as if to underline my above post,… right on queue, there she blew, my first buy trade…

Ribbon cross on Daily, positive Hourly and then a cross on the 15m + MACD…


Well seems we didn’t have much trouble getting up to and through that WTI 50$ level! :slight_smile: And now we are spending some time in this 50.20-50.40 range.

Comments concerning the factors prompting the sudden turnaround include Kuwait comments on OPEC continuing their production cuts and significant cutbacks in Libyan supplies due to the civil unrest there causing a virtual shutdown of a major oilfield and no indication how long this will last for.

But the bullish fundamentals were, in my opinion, already forming and, as usual, it only takes a specific event for the market to hook onto and unleash the pressures.

Right now it looks like we will see further gains from here, but there are probably likely to be better levels to buy into than at present.

Tomorrow is the last trading day for the month and a Friday. I don’t know what impact that will have on london trading, but we have the latest US rigs count data at 18.00 GMT which may cause some profit -taking ahead of the weekend if the data exceeds expectations.


Oil storage hub - Hamburg

Not much new this morning. Prices stayed roughly the same overnight, which means charts are unchanged but without any clear short term direction right now for the day from this level. I don’t have any resistance above the market until we start to intrude into the 50.70 to 51.40 range. Similarly, I would be interested in support around 49.50 to 49.70 but below that I would start to doubt any further upside potential for now.

I am flat now as from yesterday evening and will not trade today as it is Friday and the end of my first month in Crude.

Although we follow the benchmark prices of (mainly) WTI and Brent, not all oils are the same nor are all distances from producer to consumer, nor the transportation methods and costs, nor the grades of products refined from crude - and many other factors.

So how does the oil market work? how are individual deals done and prices agreed? This is my project for this weekend together with country profiles on US and Russia.