|
|||||||
| Forextown The magical town where all traders can gather together to discuss anything and everything about the Forex. Also, check out our main Forex site for more Forex goodness. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||||||
| Forextown The magical town where all traders can gather together to discuss anything and everything about the Forex. Also, check out our main Forex site for more Forex goodness. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Quote:
to test them out... or break them however you choose to see it and most of them have been pure crap. FAP and FAP Turbo seem to be decent but again, default settings just don't cut it. This proves that you need trading experience to use these EAs effectively. Having said that, I can also honestly say that FAP is fairly decent if you set the parameters correctly which clearly either the FAP Winners Charles or the "Marcus Leary" fictional character know anything about. They just mass sell it with the help of affiliate marketing but they know nothing about it. Now FAP aside, I can also definitely state that Steinitz EA sucks pure crap!!! It may be one of the worst crap out there with a crappy money back policy and a really sesitive EA that resets and ceases to function correctly whenever there is a hiccup in your computer, internet, or the price movement itself. FAP is infinitely better than the overprice Steinitz that most people won't be able to get a refund on. Steinitz sucks unless you want to throw away $199 just to see how much it sucks for yourself. So, I do not recommend Steinitz in any shape or form. If you do have the funds, I do recommend GoMegaFX people. But it is way out of price range for most people. I see again and again that people do not understand the trading world itself. What makes some people think that "scalper" mode is safer when you are trading in the same environment as others? Stop thinking like that all you newbies. Please. Couple of posts below I read someone saying with scalp mode the drawdown would be lot lower? How so? Drawdown occurs when the price moves against your position multiplied by the number of lots you have open in the trade. That's the drawdown. Scalp only comes into play at take profit, not at the onset of trading or during or anytime within trading itself. Why would a scalp mode be immune to what every trade and every trader would have to face? Seemingly and often rough price swings? It doesn't. Scalp tactics take place at take profit points only; meaning generally take profit won't be more than 5-10 PIPs. Also, all platforms can be run off of a dedicated server or VPS, not just metatrader platform or just FAP turbo EA. And there is no such thing as "safe trading" with "minimal drawdowns." That is dangerous thinking to trash ASAP. And don't get all riled up because I tell it like it is. It won't be an exaggeration to say that in the years to come; a ton of people will be financially ruined by willy nilly delving into the forex trading arena. Don't be one of those people with your heads in the clouds. |
|
|||
|
i am user of FAP turbo on a real account so here is what i have to say:
I had demoed the original FAP turbo after a month and it did pretty good but most people couldn't /can't deal with it's unknown/end of month stop-loss feature. that's while i like turbo, it has it fixed and on a micro account, i would definitely leave that m1 long term strategy at 1% risk so if it did hit a 500 pip stop, you loose only 50 bucks. big deal. the scalper, however, is very good so far. all winning trades. just make sure that GMT offset is correct because it doesn't trade every day in the EUR/USD. if it feel it's too risky, it may not trade for days or weeks even! so your bread an butter would be the scalper and the long term feature would be icing on the cake. I've made 92 bucks on a 1500 dollar micro account so far in the 1st 24 hrs |
|
|||
|
It appears to use a set TP, which is adjustable in the EA parameters. There is a parameter to set a trailing stop, by default it is set to zero. Default for TP is 140 pips, and SL is 500 pips for the long term. On the scalp, it shows a different TP due to a function called stealth mode (can be toggled on or off) that is supposed to prevent "broker cheating". It appears that on the scalp strategy the displayed SL and TP numbers are generated at random. In reality it takes 4-8 pips based on "internal indicators".
It also uses a "hedge" function on the long term strategy (also can be toggled) and I'm not sure what to expect with these off trend trades that are going to start piling up. There is passing mention of setting the EA to close out every month, which would close them at a loss, which is fine, but I'm not sure if they are useful enough to bother with in the first place. Steinitz uses a similar system where he recommends closing out at the end of the month. This can be a bit misleading in claims when you look at closed profits without considering all the losing open hedge positions. Pipforia on the other hand closes out all positions at a net profit, which is nice, as you don't have these lost positions eating up your margin. What I don't like about piforia is that is seems to be hypersensitive to shutdowns etc. Whenever I have restarted the program with positions open it seems to have "forgotten" about the open positions, leading to disaster. I was interested to hear the comments on Steinitz, I had heard some good things about it. It doesn't matter how good a robot is though if it is too sensitive to different types of interruptions. I will be posting my updated statements at the end of the day. I am basically looking for a good robot to reliably make a few pips when I am not able to trade manually. Thanks for the interest Last edited by lazymaritimer; 11-28-2008 at 01:09 PM. |
|
||||
|
lazy you should check out pipforia. stella is excellent and her robot kicks @ss
it is a hedgegrid system and requires a vps definatly coz you will ruin yourself if you let the platform to shutdown while you are sleeping. trading 1 pair is conservative you can trade 1 pair aggresivly by doubling your lots which is what i do. trading 2 pairs is aggressive I have that one on a 10k account and i trade 6 lots 60 dollars on 1 pair and it usualy wins 2 trades a day but like i said earlier the drawdown is 25% sometimes and that is to earn a $60 move. So you have to ask yourself are you willing to deal with that if so you will definatly earn decent with this ea. it is earning aporx $2500 a month and that is with very aggressive settings for 1 pair. Again I want to mention Stella is excellent and will definatly respond to any and all of your questions in a very expeditious manner. if you use conservative recomended settings you will earn around 12- 15% if you go aggresive than double that 24-30% what more can you ask for in a robot? |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Lazy, what are the best settings for fapturbo for the EURUSD 1M, if you can share it with everyone. For the scalping mode, i did lot risk reductor @ 20% that gave me the best result on the back testing. Did you try forex auto pilot(the older version)? |
|
|||
|
johnnykanoo, I am just wrapping up my demo with pipforia. While I was satisfied with the results, it was a bit unstable for my liking. I agree that Stella offers very good support. I'm not sure it is the right robot for my use, but there is no doubt it is a good performer.
jado, I have left the settings on automatic money management with 1.5% and 5% for the long term and scalp strategies respectively, which on my $5000 demo has been producing 0.1 lot sizes across the board. I am running both strategies on one account as well. At 0.1 lots, this is about as conservative as you can run it. Obviously a more aggressive sizing on the scalp would be the way to go. Here are my end of week results: |
|
||||
|
Hey Danny welcome to babypips.com were glad you joined the discussion.
I checked out the pipzu website and it looks good. The thing I liked is that it doesn't promise overnight riches and it isn't the same cheesy marketing that faps, faps turbo ets ets fall into. The buy now before we stop selling campaign or buy now coz soon the price is going up campaign. I didnt see any of that from pipzu. I went through the site rather quickly and I didn't notice any foward testing. I may be wrong though. Be careful of the expert advisors that show you great backtest results but no foward test results. Back testing might be ok for optimizing settings but nothing can replace a foward test to show real results. Also even a foward test is no guarentee that the market won't change but pipzu seems to have that covered with there advaced algorithm. If you try it let us know how it goes thanks, john |
|
|||
|
Hi All,
I opened a demo account in fxdd ,the automated trading.In there we dont have to take positions ourselves but just find systems provided by vendors and choose the system provider and build portfolio and wait for the system selected execute buy or sell for you. It may took longer to see any trade were taken but out of 48 transactions 39 wins since I opened 14/Nov/08.There are restrictions on Demo account as we cant open or close positions executed by the Signal provider you have selected. Do try up & let everybody knows the result. Rgds hafizam Last edited by hafizam; 11-30-2008 at 11:37 AM. Reason: correcting spelling |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|