Quote:
Originally Posted by TMoneyBags
That's true, most of the time you will find 1-3 patterns that lead to the 30/60 min patterns. If you want to find a limit that would work in any given time frame just about 85-90% of the time, I would set my limit at the .382 of the CD fib measurement (Conservative). Another option which works as well is the .382 of the AD leg (less Conservative). This is because of the fact that usually when a pattern such as a Gartley fails, it retraces to the .382 of AD (testing price) before it fails. Also take note that its roughly 50% of a patterns target 1 which is typically the .618 of AD. Also, a good tactic that works (if you have the discipline to follow it). Is to set your stop as a free trade once it hits the .236 of your XA. I've found that when 8/10 times when a pattern fails it will reach the .236 measurement of AD (wick to wick) and then fail. An even more conservative way to set a stop or limit with this method is draw your fibs from the Base price of A to the wick of D. Go back through your charts and put the theaory to the test. Its real and it works, Again I highly stress that you must be disciplined to follow methods such as this.
|
I liked the fixed and conservative take profit approach TMoney...just sometimes that little green eyed monster comes whispering in the ear, "What if it goes all the way there?" lol. But it is much more feasible and consistent.
The biggest challenge, to me, in trading is to develop the discipline. But as time goes by we grow.
Bank