5, 13, 62 Ema
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: 5, 13, 62 Ema

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    11

    Lightbulb 5, 13, 62 Ema

    I've just read a book written by Rob Booker. It's called a 5, 13, 62 strategy. I'm curious if some babypippers have applied it in their daily trading.

    For thee who have tried it, mind to share your ideas and results here? Thanks

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    440
    Hi mate

    I myself use 10 and 25 ema, but in addition you can use the macd, rsi, par sar etc

    I've tried 5 but it is very suseptable to whipsaws, meaning if theres a movement down from a uptrend the 5 ema will pick it up quickly, even though it may not really be a change in the trend.

    Play around with them until you find a combination that your happy with, alos get a practise account and back test it, most of the charting packages hold history, so go back and then run it forwards candle by candle and see if it works for you.

  3. #3
    BigPippin's Avatar
    BigPippin is offline The ***iest member of the FX-Men Superior Master Contributor and Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    911
    The use of 3 different moving averages can be effective for trading. Play around with different values because each will give you different signals. One way to use them is to look for a crossover between your shortest EMA and your longest EMA. That would be your entry.

    Your exit would then be when the short EMA crosses in the opposite direction with your medium EMA.

    When all the EMAs are in order, then it signifies a good trend.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1

    Default "Crossover"

    Hey All, speaking of crossovers, I have recently came over from the stock/option side of the trading world. Over there, for the most part, I've been told to use the simple moving averages instead of the exponential. Over here in Forex world, the later seems to be the pick. Any reason why?

  5. #5
    BigPippin's Avatar
    BigPippin is offline The ***iest member of the FX-Men Superior Master Contributor and Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    911
    Quote Originally Posted by philsfg View Post
    Hey All, speaking of crossovers, I have recently came over from the stock/option side of the trading world. Over there, for the most part, I've been told to use the simple moving averages instead of the exponential. Over here in Forex world, the later seems to be the pick. Any reason why?
    EMA's tend to have bigger spikes because they put alot of weight on the most recent periods. This makes them react quicker. While this makes for catching trends quicker, it can also be prone to fakeouts.

    It's really just a matter of personal style. If you like to use tools that put more weight on more recent data than use the EMA. However, if you like looking at the overall picture then an SMA is probably your best bet.

    Happy trading!

Forum Sponsors

Similar Threads

  1. Ema Step System.
    By maurizio77 in forum Show me the money! [Daytrading]
    Replies: 1195
    Last Post: 01-29-2011, 08:03 PM
  2. Ema
    By txiko in forum Newbie Island
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-11-2007, 04:09 PM
  3. EMA vs SMA vs WMA
    By twdh04 in forum Newbie Island
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-08-2007, 01:53 AM
  4. EMA Trading System
    By bazooko in forum Free Forex Trading Systems
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-27-2007, 11:57 PM
  5. Larger timeframes AND Larger EMA
    By nesmithdj in forum Newbie Island
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-11-2007, 05:12 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
"Success usually comes to those who are too busy to be looking for it."
Henry David Thoreau