Hello, Dale!
Quote:
Originally Posted by dpaterso
'Me thinks' you should open a demo account and start trading the VS!!!
|
Yes, going there! I already have a demo account suitable for that and have been looking for a signal a couple of weeks for half a dozen pairs without success. But what I just realised is that actually the current values of some pairs are below the most recent signals, meaning that I could open a better position now than when the signal occurred. I just need to put together a decent money management strategy first and formulate rules for entry and exit. Enty is clear with respect to the signals, but I think there needs to be an upper limit of concurrently open positions. If there is a maximum number of positions open and a great signal occurs, I also need to consider whether to close one of the open positions, and which one...
Quote:
Originally Posted by dpaterso
I see what you're saying about EUR/GBP for example but are you taking into account the ATR(14) values when selecting pairs to trade with the VS??? Remember: the VS is the 'Volatility System' and so you're looking for volatile instruments / pairs to trade with it. Remember: VOLATILITY = ATR!!!.
|
Yes I did. I experimented with a number of different parameter combinations, and I think that my backtesting can show some valuable characteristics about each pair. I repeated the test for EUR/GBP with ATR(14), factor 3.1, and here is some more statistics I found interesting:
Of the last 30 trades (last 4 years), 19 did not ever peak over 100 pips above the signal. Only 4 peaked over 200p. I would interpret this that the trend will end or turn very probably very soon after the signal, and I would like to see the potential targets higher than what this pair is willing to give. Considering that aiming at TP at the peak means more luck than skill, I would not see the risk worth taking.
I think that in case of EUR/GBP there sure is volatility, but it is outweighted by that pair's exceptionally strong and quick movements that VS cannot adapt to.
As the different pairs have different behaviour, I find it useful to determine the parameters by backtesting, thus trying to optimise the profits, and not just selecting the parameters by hunch.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dpaterso
Also: as I have said before: there is quite a bit of 'contradictory' information in 'the book' when it comes to what systems to use and when and when to stay in the trade and when to be 'out' of the trade but you need to work through this and come up with a solution that 'fits all' as it were. For example: what if you're in a valid VS trade BUT now the ADX line drops below both +DI / -DI??? The pair is no longer trending at this point and is probably going to reverse direction at some point soon??? So: do you TP now or wait for the VS to give you a SAR signal??? You know: stuff like that!!!
|
Thanks a lot for this comment! I think that if you can define a great way for finding out the ending of a trend, it will be the jackpot for this system. I'll try to formulate some rules for myself for that are based on what I have learned about various indicators so far.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dpaterso
All I'm saying is that I'm no big 'fan' of 'computerized backtesting' (no matter HOW you do it) and I'd be very surprised if the VS results in huge losses in the long run as you describe. Also remember that Wilder himself 'alludes' to the fact that of all the systems in 'the book' the VS is POSSIBLY the most profitable.
|
I also agree that there is a limit of the usability of backtesting and you need to get experience with real-time data as well before grading a strategy. I want to get a grab on a method when you are making decisions without knowing about the future, but I want to have as well some backtesting data to be able to say whether the odds are for or against me. I regard the following benefits of backtesting as the most important for me:
- go / no go decisions for strategies and pairs
- parametrisation
- time saving
Looking forward to get the ordered book,
J.