Quote:
Originally Posted by daytrader65
No the EA gave HUGHE profits on any pair, month, or year, and without any form of re-training.
The price of 1H bar0 is its closing price. If you access this bar from a lower TF eg 1M you'll have that price available for a full 59 minutes before that
1H bar actually closed..... iaw looking 59minutes into the future.
You can monitor that bar0 price in backtests and see that it is actually stable, but on foreward test the price moves with the ticks...
|
I agree that the bar with 0 shift may have a future-looking problem. The version of Neuro Trend that I have uses bars at shift 1 and 2. There is no 0 shift bar. Perhaps we refer to different versions? My version has no version number. inputs 15 and 16 are:
input[15] = gmThreshold((iMA(NULL,PERIOD_H1,5,0,MODE_EMA,PRICE _CLOSE,h1shift)-iMA(NULL,PERIOD_H1,5,0,MODE_EMA,PRICE_CLOSE,h1shif t+1))/(Point*10));
input[16] = gmThreshold((iMA(NULL,PERIOD_H1,5,0,MODE_EMA,PRICE _CLOSE,h1shift+1)-iMA(NULL,PERIOD_H1,5,0,MODE_EMA,PRICE_CLOSE,h1shif t+2))/(Point*10));
They do not refer to bar 0.
However, we are really discussing how many angels can fit on the head of a pin. Neuro trend is a NN that predicts the next few bars of an EMA. look at the attached image.
3 Filters.jpg
Two curves are digital filters, the third is neuro trend. Which do you prefer? I cannot choose either.
Although neuro trend has a small mse, that is not very useful. The mse is measured over all samples (bars). It will be very small during smooth periods, and be larger when the ema pivots. But that is precisely when accuracy is needed. Since the pivots occur less often than smooth samples, they will have small effect on the mse. In fact, a simple linear predictor will have slightly worse mse, but be just as good at the pivots. Why bother with a NN?