Rodney! Great to hear from you.
You are correct. Choppy markets are great for this strategy and since markets spend most of their time trading in ranges, this bodes well. The main reason for a hedge is so that you can add another element of cost basis reduction even when price is going against your core position. Couple that with continuing to add to your core position, you further increase your probabilities of making money on that trade.
WEEKLY UPDATE:
Performance Chart
Gross Performance = 6.24% Since inception on May 16, 2016
Net Performance = 3.1%
Total Trades = 902
Total Pips = 19,442.8 (almost to 20k!)
Biggest Drawdown = 5.18%
BronzHedgeTrader System by bronztrader | Myfxbook
Comments welcome!
BronzHedgeTrader System by bronztrader | Myfxbook
Have I caught your attention yet. You don’t need fundamental or technical or quantitative analysis to make money trading…
No you haven’t. This style of trading is very dangerous. Any mug punter can do it. But I see in your 3-month demo account you had one black swan event. That equals at least 4 of these events happening each year. What’s your contingency plan when things go wrong? And they will occur on an all too regular basis.
Come back when you have the ballz to trade this with a real $100 000 account!
Excellent, I have a taker! I’m sure you are aware that Brexit happened in June of this year that caused some moves in the forex market that are the biggest in many many years (Take a look at the charts, I’m sure you are a technical analyst so you should know this). This style of trading (as you can see) survived through it. So saying that 4 Brexits will occur every year is absurd (shows how much you have been paying attention). Not to say I didn’t learn from it. I have reduced my position size again by 1/2 and changed my hedge to start off much smaller. As you can see the volatility of the strategy has been reduced significantly since then. So I am glad that the draw down happened because I am able to benefit from it now.
To answer your question for contingency plans, I will continue to do what I have been doing, I will trade through it (and now that I know that it can make it through a brexit, I am even more comfortable with the risk).
I am curious though what your results are like. How can we really trust that you know what you are talking about unless you post results (send me a link if you have).
The fact that this strategy is up 22% in a Brexit year and in only 3 months should yield some respect! 22% in any year would make a professional money manager look like a hero especially when the S&P is only up 6.12% ytd!
Demo or not, I don’t see anyone on here with transparency like this on any strategies. More people should post their myfxbook results!! It seems like every one on babypips is taking a leap of faith in assuming that the strategy is legit since it sounds good or looks like it is working but I am not seeing any third party validation. I am not afraid to show a large draw down because that is the reality of any strategy in which you are trying to smash the indexes over time. That is the reality of my strategy and I am comfortable with the risk.
The whole notion of stop losses and profit target is nonsense to me because you are trying to fit a completely random market into a box that requires the market to act in a certain way to make money. In my strategy, I don’t require the market to act in a certain way in a specific time to make money. I can keep my position sizing so small that whenever the market decides on its own to turn around, I can reap the benefits. The markets are not perfect so why try to create a strategy that assumes a perfect market.
I will await your reply…
First I trade with real money. Although if you were an active member you would know my personal financial position. Second, type in “price action trading on tick chart” into the search engine bro. All exposed there.
6 years still working in demo accounts hey bro. Guess you know your stuff then. These “black swan” events may be used to describe market conditions such as BREXIT or the SNB debarked. But are equally relevant when doing what you’re doing and may not be in the form of big market moves. Just a simple shift in market sentiment can leave you exposed when you went long and the market reversed never to recover. We’ve all gone long off a high and short of low and been hit with the results.
Facts are if you are holding positions in the market you are exposed to risk. The more positions you hold, the longer you hold them the greater the risks. Not to mention costs building up to hold that position. Your tactic is to add to that risk. That’s just dumb. But that’s just IMHO. You do what you like, but once you start trading your money in a real account, then will talk shop. Until then we’ll let this thread die a nature death…
That’s great that you trade with real money, except how can I really verify that (or anyone else reading these threads). I hope to be doing the same soon as well. I have my own reasons for not trading a real money account but I am completely transparent about trading a demo account. (And I am super anxious about finally be making some money when i can. Trust me… after six years and seeing results like this! you have no idea!)
I breezed through your thread and to be honest I am not convinced of really anything. I didn’t see anything that seemed really special or unique about it when compared to all the other price action threads on baby pips. Looks like basic technical analysis. I saw some winners and some losers on there, and I see you’ve only posted like 10 trades in all of 2016? and nothing in 2015?? Where’s the transparency??
You claim to make a certain % per trade, but i mean how can we really know. I will give you the benefit of the doubt and say that I want to believe that you are making money but how can anyone reading your thread know that your strategy actually works over the long term. You have posted probably less than 10 trades in the last 1.5 years plus (and I have 3,800+ trades in the last 3-4 months for all to see!)
And separately, how can we know what your draw downs are? You give me crap about mine but no one really has any insight into your max draw down. How do we know you aren’t trading more than you say you are? The lack of transparency of your thread (and the vast majority of threads on babypips!) leaves a lot of questions on the table.
Let’s be clear that everyone on babypips who has a demo or a real account has the ability to link their trading accounts to myfxbook.com so why don’t more people do it? Why don’t you do it?? (And it’s really easy to do!) You are an FX legendary man, but that is just because you post a lot, doesn’t necessarily mean you are smashing the indexes on performance.
And I am still appalled you are pouting at 22% in 3-4 months. Go take a look at the hedgefund index this year, they are barely breaking even!
So, in regards letting this thread die a “nature” death, that won’t happen because the readers of baby pips deserve to know the the truth about the strategies that are posted on here and an easy way to do that is to link a myfxbook account.
The ball is in your court Milk Man (or Dairy Queen, whichever you prefer). Lets see a myfxbook link to your actual results…
Because fxbook only links to MT4 & not even everyone on here punts via that clunky, amateurish crock of ##
Plus of course there are various reasons folks use data crunching applications. It’s not always just for the purpose of waving your todger around & beating your chest in public.
Some track, record & present their data privately to investors, brokers or industry affiliates seeking funding arrangements, others might be looking to put themselves in the shop window to see who/what’s out there, but having said that there are more appropriate & effective locations than Babypips for someone looking to achieve that objective. And others simply do so simply for personal analysis & self-feedback purposes.
So anyway, who were you on here during a previous life then?
Yeah, I was sensitive once too…
Love ya bro
So It’s the blind leading the blind eh. I question why you would defend someone from refusing to show proof that their strategy is valid, especially when they have a thread dedicated to said strategy (I am doing us all a favor). I am asking the question that we are all thinking at the back of our minds and the question that we ALL should be asking. “How can we know if this is real and what truly is the performance of this strategy over the long run?” I don’t take what people say at their word, I ask for proof.
Most readers read these thread when trying to learn how to trade, but are we expected to just take everything we see with a grain of salt? How do readers know how to separate a good “story” from a good “strategy”?
And, there are plenty of traders that use MT4. Those that do have no excuse for not posting performance especially if they have a thread dedicated to that strategy. Not using MT4 is still not an excuse to not show additional transparency into the validity of your strategy. There are plenty of other ways to do it. So if you are going to try and teach a strategy by posting a thread and then point to it as backup, show some hard data!
lol, I don’t care what you say. Jury is still out man. Let’s see some proof. And I’m sorry to call you out, but you asked for it… =)
Love you too, bro.
I’m not defending anybody mate.
Billybob is big & ugly enough to defend himself bless him, I’m simply pointing out why your ideal world scenario has & never will be a reality or the norm. You can wish all you like but it simply aint gonna happen for any number of reasons.
I’ve personally seen 4 very impressive positive expectancy live broker stat track sheets from punters on here since 2011 (3 of which i help to facilitate) betting off the same generic framework, an albeit small low percentage sample, that you or anyone else will never see.
Why?
Because they weren’t or aren’t here to satisfy your or anyone else’s curiosity or to confirm that something does or doesn’t work. They were/are here purely & simply for their own greedy, self-centred reasons. Funnily enough it’s an oft recurring & quite common trait associated with successful business people.
They’re not interested in anyone else but themselves, which is why, in part they’re successful in the first place.
As I said previously, not everyone is here to prove a point or have their ego stroked.
Talking of which isn’t it about time you actually had some skin in the game?
And I completely agree that transparency will always be an issue on babypips (or any other trading forum). Unless you are looking at audited financial statements, there is no real way to tell. Myfxbook.com is not without fault either, but I think it works towards that goal of providing transparency.
And, the readers of babypips are just as much at fault as the authors in fostering an environment where “we trust, but don’t verify.” The readers are not requiring proof, so the authors of these threads have had free reign. This CAN certainly change if the readers just start questioning these things. Not only would this increase the integrity of the material on BabyPips but it would strengthen the BabyPips community.
When you say you knew 3-4 traders that “betting off the same framework” do you mean my same strategy? And you’re reference to “low percentage” meaning that these strategies are just rare? I am just curious.
I accept that there are many different ways to trade and there are some strategies that truly blow it out of the water. And I am sure there are some valid strategies on Babypips, but we can’t really verify that by looking at one trade to the next. The only proof that is common on babypips is a lot of before and after charts, but this doesn’t mean squat if the overall performance sucks. One trade to the next isn’t going to tell you what we need to know. We need to know the whole picture.
And in reference to getting skin in the game, I can’t help but agree with you lol and I will! Soon my friend…
I don’t disagree, & if indeed every thread starter/author/guru of a specific strategy was required to validate & verify their ongoing live account profitability the forum would be as empty as the Rio Olympic track & field stadium on a dreary, rainy afternoon.
A large percentage of the threads in the strategy section & accompanying sectors on here & similar sites are simply variations on a theme. They’re regurgitated, peddled & copied from one forum, book or article to another, influenced by “educators” most of whom couldn’t trade a pocket money account if their life depended on it & “expert” business analysts & media from the popular press & t.v dream factories.
Brokers add to the merry-go-round by encouraging the dream with their in-house analytical snippets, seminars, trade school programmes & enticing account deals. The majority of participants are well out of their depth from day one & never really recover. They’re constantly fed just enough information to keep them on a string & if/when they wash up on retail forums they’re further brainwashed by half wit ego maniacs, spoof merchants & career trolls.
Know, not knew. They’re still live & kicking.
No, I mean the same [U]framework[/U] or generic [U]approach[/U].
If you choose to apply part of an overall gambling portfolio that adopts a manual/discretionary option comprising a small, logical set of criteria that is based on an unambiguous, non-subjective framework, your chances of progress will be that much greater if you match that criteria up with consistently repetitive outcomes influenced & exacerbated in line with herd psychology.
After all, it’s part of how mass participation markets function. Even (some of) the machines are programmed & primed incorporating a healthy slice of that cake in their computations.
No, the small percentage is in relation to the individuals as opposed to the approach/strategies.
The only ones being lead in these types of places are the sheep of this world, but these character types would experience the same ultimate outcome regardless which endeavour they pursued.
The street smart, more switched on operators, of which in my experience there are few in these types of endeavour beyond industry experienced players, often have a knack of quickly assessing, filtering & successfully side stepping the time wasting nonsense, but it calls for razor sharp intuitive skills & an ability to spot a bull sh*tter from 50 paces.
Unfortunately from my experience anyway, there are precious few who fit that bill.
T’is a tough old playground, especially for the naïve, unprepared newbie but the brokers need a constant trickle of them + a good percentage of low profit/breakeven punters to keep the dream alive long enough to encourage others into the cobweb in the belief they’re only a few tantalising steps away from cracking the code!
The great rock n roll swindle!
im impressed that you aswell can post intelligent and usefull content when you feel like having a good day 
in average you need 10 $uckers to feed 1 wolf. so let the bucket shop advertisements come 24/7 on tv as they are since a few years.
Here is some insight into what my positions look like currently. These are all daily charts and even with all of these positions on I am using only 4.38% of my buying power.
Updated positions. Looks like I may have missed a profit opportunity on the USDCHF. Not 100% sure though.
