As per much reading last night, I decided against choosing an ECN straight off the bat. Being unsure of how safe my money would be with FXOpen (mauritius, not nfa regulated, their regulation over there can be purchased for 10000 USD

), I'm left with an ECN option of MB Trading due to capital restraints. I still can't trade with them because of age which is the ONLY reason I've decided to choose a retail broker which I feel comfortable with.
After looking further into the bigger names, I had a list of 3: GFT Forex, Alpari US/UK, Interbank FX. Why these three? Metatrader 4 (GFT aside- which still seems to have a good platform in DealBook360), NFA regulation, and a reputation around these forums as being the bigger names worth trading with.
My decision:
Alpari: No
Why?- Spreads are lower than IBFX, however limitations in the withdrawals and deposits of money (in regards to fees) make it worthless for me to deposit small capital and have fees eating up capital.
Interbank FX: No
Why?- Issues and cases I saw in the NFA files led me to feel safer against it, EVEN THOUGH they were solved.
GFT Forex: Yes
Why?- Many on the forums told me GFT is worth it. Reviewpips had the same sentiment for the most part and though I'm still looking into how the spreads will be (opening a demo with them today), I feel okay depositing the minimum of $200 usd JUST to get started.
The idea of me going live right now is not to make a living, I know I'm not doing that yet

. The idea for me is testing the waters, limiting risk, while experiencing how the LIVE market differs from that of a demo account.
----------------------------------------------------
Now, in the time leading up to when I hope to trade with MB Trading (the ECN), I hope to use GFT's live account profitably. That is my only goal. If I can grow that $200 account to double or more within a year, I'll feel comfortable moving to MB Trading or even sticking with GFT as my main broker.
What are your guys' thoughts?