Are Your Funds Safe? NFA to Shut down small forex fcms

[forex savior]

An email is circulating around the net that FXLQ has apparently sent to their customers. The CFTC is about to sue them. FXLQ is in deep, deep, deep trouble:

FXLQ Shut down temporarily by NFA - Page 7

Tuesday, December 18, 2007

To our Valued Clients:

We have temporarily suspended operations due to a Commodity Futures Trading Commission lawsuit filed against the company in Federal Court. Please be assured that as soon as we are able, we will return any messages.

There is a hearing in the U.S. District Court scheduled for January 4, 2008 where we hope to resolve all issues the CFTC has with our company.

Thank you,

Forex Liquidity LLC

[forex savior]

Now that the CFTC has begun their investigation of One World Capital expect some rather unsavory things to come out in the next few months. The Chicago Sun Times just ran this story today on the suit filed against One World:

Feds freeze assets of Winnetka trading firm :: CHICAGO SUN-TIMES :: Business

Feds freeze assets of Winnetka trading firm

December 19, 2007
BY DAVID ROEDER Staff Reporter

Federal regulators have obtained a court order freezing the assets of a Winnetka trading firm after customers said it denied them access to their cash.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission sued the firm, One World Capital Group LLC, and its president, John Edward Walsh, 59, of Lake Forest. The firm specializes in foreign currency markets, allowing customers to conduct trading through specialized software.

The CFTC said that since Nov. 2, customers have reported that redemption requests exceeding $4 million have been denied. The agency, which regulates futures trading, also said One World has been unable to prove it has net capital of at least $1 million, the minimum required of foreign currency traders.

“It is true that some customer redemptions have not been satisfied,” said Kevin Flynn, an attorney representing Walsh. Flynn said his client is committed to working with the CFTC to resolve any complaints.

The firm has about 1,500 customer accounts, he said, adding that he couldn’t comment on its financial state.

The case is the third major complaint to be filed in recent months against Chicago-area trading firms. The CFTC and other agencies are investigating Sentinel Management Group Inc. and Lake Shore Asset Management Ltd. for alleged misappropriation of customer funds.

Walsh could not be reached. Records with the National Futures Association show that he started One World in 2005 after previous employment with several trading firms, including Rosenthal Collins Group LLC and Commerz Futures LLC.

The NFA also said he has been involved in three cases involving customer reparations, but details were unavailable.

Scott Williamson, deputy regional counsel for the CFTC, said the firm dealt mostly in the cash foreign exchange contract and phased out a business in futures contracts. He said Walsh may have improperly commingled customer funds with his own trading, or failed to hedge its risk.

So what happened to the money? Well sources are telling me that yesterday Charles Martin threw a big bash at the Chicago House of Blues that cost a fortune. Who is Charles Martin? Well he is the guy who applied with the NFA to become a principal of One World Capital but was turned down because:
BASIC Case Summary

in 1997, in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, Martin pled guilty to the felony offense of possession of less than 15 grams of cocaine. The Notice of Intent charged that Martin's guilty plea to a felony offense disqualifies him from registration under Section 8a(3)(D) of the Commodity Exchange Act ("Act").

In addition, the Notice of Intent alleged that in 2000, also in Cook County, Illinois, Martin pled guilty to and was found guilty of the misdemeanor offense of theft. The Notice of Intent charged that Martin's guilty plea to and conviction of a misdemeanor offense involving theft disqualifies him from registration under Section 8a(3)(E)(iii) of the Act.

I love Martin's response to the NFA's decision to deny his principalship. He, "did not deny the allegations contained therin. However, he stated that he intended to show that his conditioned registration would not pose a risk to the public."

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiight. Why didn't he just claim to have found Jesus? The NFA still rejected Martin in any case. But that didn't stop him from running the show at One World. The NFA says in its own complaint against One World earlier this year that "NFA received information that Martin was in charge of One World's entire operation and was acting as an undisclosed principal of the firm."
BASIC Case Summary

Last month One World "Agreed" to never allow Charles Martin to set foot in their office again in a settlement with the NFA. But looks like the damage has already been done. Within weeks of the NFA's decision the firm went bust. And Mr. Martin can be seen hoisting a Cold Frosty One at a downtown Chicago bar, laughing all the way to the bank...

[forex savior]

Forex Liquidity is apparently in debt to its customers to the tune of $11.6 million. Here is the official CFTC Press Release:

CFTC Sues Futures Commission Merchant Forex Liquidity LLC Alleging Undercapitalization in Excess of $11.6 Million

Washington, DC – The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced today that on December 13, 2007, it sued Forex Liquidity LLC (Forex Liquidity), a registered Futures Commission Merchant (FCM) in Santa Ana, California, charging it with being undercapitalized in excess of $11.6 million and also with failing to maintain required books and records.

On December 14, 2007, the CFTC won an asset freeze and other emergency relief that will enable the Commission to freeze the remaining assets of Forex Liquidity and safeguard the interests of its customers.

According to the CFTC complaint, as of November 30, 2007, and perhaps earlier, Forex Liquidity’s net capitalization was below the minimum required by the Commission. As a Forex Dealer Member of the National Futures Association (NFA) offering to be the counterparty to retail customer foreign currency transactions, Forex Liquidity is required to have a minimum adjusted net capital of $1 million; instead, according to the complaint, as of December 7, 2007, it had an adjusted net capital deficit of approximately $11.6 million.

Forex Liquidity is also alleged to have been unable to produce required financial documentation regarding its assets and liabilities. For example, according to the CFTC’s complaint, Forex Liquidity represented in reports and discussions with NFA that its assets at one time included a $35 million ABN-AMRO bond located in Switzerland. The complaint further alleges that Forex Liquidity represented to the NFA that the ABN-AMRO bond (or its proceeds) were transferred to a U.S. registered broker dealer, Commonwealth Financial Network (CFN); however, CFN does not have an account for Forex Liquidity and the account number that the defendant provided to NFA was fictitious.

Accordingly, the CFTC also charged Forex Liquidity with failure to maintain books and records of its business transactions, specifically, current ledgers that accurately reflect its assets and liabilities.

In the ongoing action in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, the CFTC seeks an order of permanent injunction against the defendant, monetary penalties, and other relief. The Honorable Cormac J. Carney, U.S. District Judge, issued the restraining order freezing the assets of Forex Liquidity and prohibiting the defendant from destroying documents or denying CFTC staff access to books and records.

[forex savior]

Today is the day when the $5 million minimum capital requirement rule takes effect. News out of Money Garden is that they are dropping their high leverage accounts in order to comply with the new rule. That means no more 400:1 leverage from MG, or 200:1 for that matter.

The following firms have still not publically indicated they have met the requirement. Beware these firms until further notice:

1) SNC Investments: $1,152,000
They are well below the $5 million capital requirement. It is highly unlikely they will make the new requirement at this point. I advise customers to leave this firm and look for greener pastures.

Update: Just went to their website and there is no reference at all to being able to open an account with them. I suspect they are just going to be an introducing broker from now on.

2) Wall Street Derivatives: $1,228,000
This firm is based out of New Zealand and I'm not even sure they have any U.S. customers as their U.S. website is out of service.

3) Advanced Markets: $1,322,000
Amifx is already teetering on the brink as they are the subject of a business conduct committee case before the NFA in which they are cited for a whole host of financial violations including not meeting the old capital requirement. This firm does not have much of a future.

4) AlpariFX $2,481,000
Little known European firm. Well under the cap requirement.

5) Solid Gold Financial: $2,040,000
Solid Gold's future is now in serious doubt. Like many of the other firms on this list they have been charged by the NFA with failing to meet their existing capital requirement. When you can't meet the old requirement it stands to reason you won't be able to meet the new one either. Solid Gold is anything but a solid investment at this point.

6) Bacera Corporation: $2,300,000
Like a turd that won't flush Bacera Corporation just refuses to go down the drain. The Savior wrote Bacera off over the summer as sources knowledgeable about them stated they were going to close up shop. But no, they are still hustling the folks in LA for fresh deposits. In September Bacera settled a complaint with the NFA after it was discovered they were undercapitalized to the tune of $1.2 million. NFA reported Bacera only has about 200 customers as it is. But to those 200, do yourself a favor and get yourself another broker because sooner or later the pipes are gonna get cleaned and these guys are going to get flushed once and for all.

Update: They published their Holiday Trading Schedule on their website. So they apparently don't plan on closing their doors. Do they have the money? Is the CFTC going to raid the place after the Holidays? We'll soon find out.

7) ODL Securities: $2,566,000
Ravaged by undercapitalization issues.

8) Forex Club: $3,320,000
They still have not hit the minimum $5 million mark. And don't forget since they are a market maker they have other financial requirements to meet as well. They still haven't publically done so.

9) Easy Forex: $3,789,000
Under siege for their sleazy sales tactics, it's hard to imagine the NFA isn't going to drop the hammer on them soon.

So now what? Judging from the NFA's website it doesn't appear they will be moving in for the kill yet. In fact, it may not be until January that we find out who will survive and who will perish. So if you have any money at these at risk firms get it out now. And Merry Christmas everyone!

[BostonForex]

Originally Posted by juxtatrader

I would check really hard into FXCM. If you are really concerned about your money then I would look at more then just their net cap at the moments.

For instance? FXCM is a very reputable firm IMO. I know more than a hand full of people who use them to clear through and are nothing but happy. They have followed nothing but full compliance at this time of new regulation, and will likely continue to remain a staple in the industry..

[kagein]

You could open an account with FXCM UK as its regulated by the FSA and your funds would be secure should the firm go bust, i think thats the case with all UK forex brokers.

[forex savior]

NFA Fines Solid Gold

No word on whether Solid Gold has made the capital requirement however.

NFA orders San Francisco firm to pay $35,000 fine

January 2, Chicago - National Futures Association (NFA) has ordered Solid Gold Financial Services Inc. (Solid Gold), a Futures Commission Merchant located in San Francisco, California, to pay a fine of $35,000. The Decision, issued by NFA's Business Conduct Committee, is based on a Complaint filed in November 2007 and a settlement offer submitted by Solid Gold.

The Committee found that Solid Gold used misleading advertisement and submitted false or misleading information to NFA. The Committee also found that Solid Gold failed to provide its customers with required disclosure regarding NFA's Background Affiliation Status Information Center (BASIC) and failed to obtain required information from its customers. Additionally, the Committee found that Solid Gold failed to take applicable concentration charges, failed to maintain the required adjusted net capital and failed to collect the required minimum security deposit.

[forex savior]

A new year brings with it a new forex industry. Let's hope that the new year will be a lot better than the last. Last year the NFA had its hands full as over a dozen firms went under dragging thousands of investors to the bottom of the sea. The NFA has stated that there are now only 24 registered forex dealer members. It appears the following four firms were recently removed from this exclusive club of 24:

1) Hamilton Williams (Velocity4X)
2) Royal Forex
3) Solid Gold
4) SNC Investments

NFA reports four forex firms have ceased operations in light of increased capital requirements

January 11, Chicago - National Futures Association (NFA) announced today that four of its Forex Dealer Members (FDMs) have ceased operations as a result of NFA's new $5 million capital requirement, which became effective on December 21. In addition, six additional FDMs have ceased operating since September 1, 2007.

"When NFA's Board of Directors adopted the increased capital requirement on August 15, 2007, NFA had 34 registered FDMs," said Regina Thoele, vice-president of Compliance. "As of December 31, 2007, that number has decreased to 24."

The four firms that were unable to meet the new capital requirement and ceased operating transferred their customer accounts to other FDMs.

"We closely monitored each of the firms to ensure that customer funds were transferred to another, fully-capitalized firm," says Thoele.

But I wouldn't be surprised if the NFA took some further dramatic actions in the next few weeks as firms like Advanced Markets are still way below the capital requirement as of the last CFTC financial report:

Financial Data for FCMs

Developing...

[jimbospeed]

Great Posts F/S I can sit and read this stuff endlessly.... What tangled webs we weave....

[forex savior]

Well it appears the NFA is not done with its capital increase crusade. They are pushing hard in the Congress to increase the minimum capital requirement to $20 million and it appears they have succeeded. The Congress has passed legislation to do just that:

Forex Street Weblog: New bill means though times for retail FDM's

When such a new rule would become law is unclear. But it looks like we'll have to go through this whole capital requirement ordeal again...