Quote:
Originally Posted by forex savior
On July 31 the NFA’s FIFO order comes into effect. As of this moment the MT4 trading platform is not compliant with this rule and there is no guarantee that it will become compliant come the July deadline.
For firms that heavily rely on MT4 this is bad news. FXDD, which uses MT4 but are not regulated and therefore under no obligation to comply with NFA rules at present, are taking advantage of their unregulated status by telling NFA to get bent. As an unregulated firm they can do what they like (then again the whole issue of FXDD being unregulated is a serious red flag in and of itself. After all, the feds could basically raid the firm at anytime and shut them down overnight.)
But IBFX is (unfortunately for them) regulated solely by the NFA and their only trading platform at present is MT4. What is IBFX to do?
IBFX’s CEO seems confident and in “nothing to see here style” stated the following in an email to customers:
Forex Factory - View Single Post - All USA FX dealers may not be able to support MT4
That all sounds reassuring, but what if something isn’t worked out by July 31st?
Meta Quotes is under no obligation to jump through hoops for IBFX and the NFA. And if Meta Quotes chooses not to (or is technically unable to) make any major changes to MT4 then IBFX is in big, big trouble as they will be stuck with a platform that is basically illegal.
Would IBFX close? Would they halt trading? Would the NFA and CFTC step in? Would IBFX be granted an extension by regulators? Can they get a UK license in time? Can they roll out a new trading platform in time?
Finally, how on earth did IBFX allow itself to be put in such a vulnerable position where their entire company is at the mercy of an independent third party based in Russia?
These should be mandatory questions that every current and potential customer of IBFX should be asking.
|
You're usually spot on, but here I disagree.
Firstly, of course Metaquotes has to jump through hoops to fix this problem for their customers, ie IBFX and others. It's a simple matter of the customer is always right, and not helping out IBFX would likely translate into a Metatrader death sentence as brokers everywhere would jump ship realizing that Metaquotes allowed IBFX to get badly hurt.
Second, what do you mean by "Finally, how on earth did IBFX allow itself to be put in such a vulnerable position where their entire company is at the mercy of an independent third party based in Russia?"
What's the difference to a company being at the mercy of Microsoft for instance? That's todays outsorced world, nothing extraordinary about that as far as I can see. Is it the russian part that bothers you?
( The dental organisation I work for is 100% dependent on a Finnish software company. If they wanted to, they could basically wreck us beyond rescue.)
Thirdly, what guarantees are there that brokers with their own in house built platforms will be able to comply with FIFO on time? Most likely they don't have the software muscles that Metaquotes likely has. Who knows, maybe those are the brokers that will end up deep in it, not IBFX.
MT4 is such a widely used program and so everyone knows that it doesn't comply as of today, but what about other brokers in house programs that are less watched? Who knows what those brokers are sitting on? A FIFO bomb maybe...