After the reaction of financial markets to the meetings of central banks, European investors will focus again on the referendum on the permanence of the UK in the EU. Regarding this subject there is a slight discrepancy between the polls and the odds offered by the bookmakers. The latest polls point to a growing advantage of the favorable field outside the EU. However, the bookmakers continue to assign a higher probability to the “Remain”. The reason for this difference is that the bookmakers, based on similar events that occurred in the past, presuppose that the undecided will vote for continuity. Thus, according to this assumption of bookmakers, the undecided tend to vote for the stay. Today will meet the Bank of England and the referendum is undoubtedly the main theme of the press conference.
Investors will continue to react to economic data, trying to anticipate what may be the decisions of the Fed. But this pattern has become more complex from the time the Fed began to give greater importance to the behavior of financial markets.
The rise in crude on Friday is associated with a recovery of some risky assets (due to a decrease in fears for the Brexit) and a technical reaction to the losses suffered in the previous days. From a fundamental point of view, there is still an imbalance between supply and demand, which although not as pronounced as at the beginning of the year continues to persist.
The devaluation of the price of the dollar boosted commodities, with the exception of gold that had previously attracted purchases from investors because of their defensive nature. Although in Wall Street, investors continue to monitor developments in Europe, the main event of the day will be the testimony of Janet Yellen on the financial committee of the Senate at 15:00.
The Asian session was relatively quiet, reflecting the expectations of investors concerning tomorrow’s referendum in the UK. The only exception was the Japanese market, which once again was affected by the appreciation of the yen. The Japanese currency has shown great resilience in relation to other haven assets and has not suffered losses the latter recorded in recent days. The rise of the yen pressured shares of exporters, which in turn, penalized the Nikkei.
yesterday US markets closed with modest losses. While waited for today’s referendum, US investors focused on factors specific sectors and companies. Oil traded volatile fashion, following during the morning the rise of other risk assets but later reversing this trend when the Department of Energy published a report that showed an unexpected increase in gasoline reserves. In the technology sector, investors reacted negatively to the offer launched by Tesla (producer of electric cars) on the SolarCity by 2800 M.USD. In the Dow Jones, the highlight was the weakness of the shares of McDonald’s (-1.50%) after Nomura analysts have reduced the recommendation of Buy to Neutral. Last year, McDonald’s has shown a over-performance against the S & P, the result of a major restructuring of the company. Today, it is expected that investors maintain an expectant attitude.
Four months of nervousness that dominated all the attention. Against expectations, the Brexit won and now will begin negotiations for farewell to the European Union. But the impact on markets was felt soon and experts are on the alert. Investment banks and asset managers are informing customers of the referendum effects on the economy and markets.
After the result of the referendum in the United Kingdom, which finally ruled the exit of this country from the EU, investors, economic operators, policymakers are facing a scenario that until Thursday was purely hypothetical and that will have ramifications (many unpredictable) that will last for years. The closest scenario that was envisioned was an exit of Greece from the Euro zone, something that has been widely discussed but never realized. The biggest threat to the financial markets is uncertainty. Markets prefer a negative event to an event whose ramifications are uncertain. When a given scenario materializes, investors look for similar events in the past in order to obtain patterns or trends that help them to understand the new scenario. But sometimes there are no precedents. September 11 is a good example. Not only was an unprecedented event as was a comparison for future attacks in Madrid and London. But as September 11, the Brexit does not have an antecedent that offers a relatively useful comparison. Investors and economists can try to anticipate some of its consequences but they are unaware of its contours, its magnitude and its extension, financially, economically and politically. Focusing in particular to the financial impact, the first shock-fitted into, in general, in the idealized scenario, although the magnitude was difficult to anticipate. In currency markets, the Pound and the Euro were the main “victims”, while the Swiss Franc and the Yen, which in the perception of investors are “safe”, recorded strong valuations. In debt markets, US government bonds and German bonds registered gains, while corporate debt and peripheral countries debt devalued. These two movements together have led to an increase in the spread between German yields and their European counterparts. Interestingly, the English debt showed a recovery, despite warnings from rating agencies. In stock markets, the declines were sharp, with the DAX recording the largest daily decline since the financial crisis of 2008. Another curious note was that the FTSE100 had an over-performance. This pattern was observed due to the strong exposure that the companies that are part of this index have in external economies. The vast majority of investors deceived by polls and indications of bookmakers, abandoned a defensive stance adopted earlier, to take a few days before the referendum, a positioning that would benefit from the “remain” (Expecting UK to remain in the EU). Now they will be forced to a new repositioning, which may take several days and may generate high volatility. So it is not excluded that the movements recorded on Friday to extend during the session today, although on a smaller scale. The fund managers should adopt a more defensive stance, reducing their exposure to equity markets and concentrating in securities less related to economic cycles, with businesses benefiting from the decline in yields and offering a more appealing dividend yield . On the other hand, fund managers want to increase the liquidity of their portfolios in order to correspond to a hypothetical increase in redemptions of its funds by investors. In this complex picture is added the results of the Spanish elections, which have not yet set a stable majority. In the pre-opening, the European indices traded with a drop of about 1%. The assets considered “refuge”, traded mostly higher.
Asian markets closed with opposing tendencies. On one hand, the Japanese and Chinese stock exchanges ended with modest gains, but on the other, the indices of Hong Kong and Sidney finished lower again. Stocks in these two markets have a strong connection to British banks. In fact, institutions such as HSBC and Standard Chartered have high exposure to several Southeast Asian countries and Australia.
The recovery triggered by the purchase of selling positions by hedge funds and other short-term investors, was also observed in the forex market and the pound reached gains of more than 1% against the dollar. However, this increase is still modest considering that the English currency had lost 13% since Thursday, a very sharp move to one of the major world currencies. The potential for recovery of the British Pound and therefore the equity markets is uncertain, given the uniqueness of the times we are experiencing. From a technical point of view and using the DAX as a sample for the European market as a whole, the main resistance zone is between 9720 and 9780. Many fund managers intend to take a more defensive position and can take advantage of market recoveries to decrease their exposure to shares.
At the current moment all seek to know what is the extent of the recovery of European stock markets. In fact, there is a risk that this rally is taken advantage of by many fund managers to decrease their exposure to equity markets. The recent rally takes various characteristics of a climb framed in a downward medium term movement: the main buyers are hedge funds and short-term investors which are closing selling positions, the volume is not high and the sessions are particularly volatile. All these signs advise greater caution.
In the pre-opening, European indexes traded with some gains. Initially, investor sentiment will be influenced by the the words from the Governor of the Bank of England, Mark Carney, who said that this institution is ready “to take any action to support the economy.” These words were not a surprise but served to ensure investors’ expectations regarding the Central Bank stance. However, Standard & Poor’s reduced the rating of the European Union from “AA +” to “AA” with a stable outlook, due to the departure of the United Kingdom from the European Union. In principle, EU stocks should not react significantly to the various data that have been published in Asia.
Asian indices extended the end of the rally last week, despite the uncertainty generated by the inconclusive outcome of the elections in Australia. In fact, from the results of the polls, no party can form a stable government, coming up just a phase of negotiations. Rating agencies have warned that the political deadlock is prolonged, the financial rating of Australia (which is the highest in the three largest agencies) may be revised downwards.
Wall Street investors will continue to monitor the developments in Europe but expectedly with the same detachment that demonstrated so far.
In England, three funds dedicated to the real estate market suspended the possibility of its subscribers to withdrawals. The surrounding European policy, marked by uncertainty in the United Kingdom, Spain, Austria and Italy had risks that apparently the financial markets were not considering in full. It was not noticeable if last week’s rise had been a technical reaction to the falls of the post-referendum days or mirrored one complacency of investors to the risks mentioned. The Brexit effects are not yet fully visible, but at this stage the referendum showed known issues, including the delicate situation of some Italian banks. With the earnings season in the US approach, the possibility of investors give greater emphasis to the exposure of American companies to the Eurozone, recalling that in the last 4 quarters, corporate profits have been declining.
In England, real estate funds continue to suspend the possibility of redemption. English real estate market, especially in the London area, has been one of the most dynamic worldwide. Several investors sought this market to diversify its portfolio of assets, other acquired properties in England as a solution to a situation marked by equal interest rates or below 0%. Other investors faced the English real estate market as a refuge: in 2011, the Greeks were the main buyers of homes in London. Now, with the strong depreciation of the pound these investments lost value when denominated in the national currency of these investors.
The Italian Government submitted a recapitalization plan for the banking sector (the most urgent the Monte dei Paschi di Siena) by state intervention, which is allowed by European standards but only under certain conditions. One of those conditions is that the bondholders participate in this plan through a partial restructuring of the debt they hold on banks. It is at this point that differs from the position of the Italian Government and the European Commission. At the end of 2015, the insolvency of four regional banks that affected nearly 20,000 private bondholders created a deep social objection that the Italian Government now wants to avoid. The second part of the Italian plan provides that a fund (consisting of banks, foundations and other institutions) buy the bad debt of some banks.
Begins today officially the earnings season in the US, with the publication of quarterly Alcoa’s accounts, but only after the closing of the session. The forecasts point to a result per share of 0.09 USD, below the 0.19 USD recorded in the 2nd quarter of 2015. Although there is no statistical correlation between the quarterly accounts of Alcoa and the general trend of Earnings Season, the results of this company always have a impact on investor psychology.
Once again Asian markets closed higher, led by Japanese equities. After the electoral victory of the weekend, Prime Minister Abe stated that his executive is ready to take further measures to stimulate the economy, according to some members of his party, could amount to 100 000 M.USD. In China, inflation relative to June increased 1.90% compared to 2% in May. The Beijing government has an official target of 3%. This confirms the slowdown of the Chinese economy and raises expectations among investors that new stimulus measures may be adopted.
US markets extended the recent rise, with the S & P and Dow Jones reaching a new record high during the session. For the rise contributed some positive signs from Europe (including the end of the political stalemate in the English Conservative party) and the electoral victory of Shinzo Abe in Japan, whose promised measures of stimulus have indirect consequences on Wall Street. In addition also had influence the strong recovery of oil and the need for many fund managers follow the rise of the benchmark indices. Against this uncertain scenario, the fund managers had adopted a defensive posture, which will now have to leave if the S & P continue to appreciate in value.