Some more thoughts from me after a little reflection…
In my experience, trading education is WAY too overpriced. The amount of hours of class you get versus the amount of education you receive within that timeframe is not really a good deal.
As an example, take your average retail trading education course. 5 day seminars usually price out to around $5000. If we’re assuming 5 days are 8 hours a day, multiply that to get 40 hours for $5000. That’s $125 per hour of education.
Compare that to the closest equivalent that you’d get going to a top tier business school teaching finance. As an example, NYU’s Stern school of business charges $1500 per credit (part time or full time). 3 credits is typical for one course, meaning 3 hours per week (not including homework time, which is a multiple of class time). 3 credits X $1500 = $4500. The average academic year will yield 13-15 classes. Lets make that 14 as an average. 14 X 3 = 42 hours of education for $4500. Works out to $109 per hour of education.
Now lets take a look at the advantages you’d get going to a top tier b-school over some Masters of the Market LLC:
- The teachers you have will have verifiable experience in their field of endeavor.
- The teachers will have years of experience teaching, in many cases, meaning they can clearly relate the subject matter to you and give you quality assignments.
- Most of the students you are going to be around are not some poker hacks off the street with nothing better to do, they are people with brains and ambition who want to succeed as badly as you.
- Teachers have office hours.
Most important:
- If you carry through with the program, you get a reputable diploma in your hands which you can use to get a job in the business if you ever need one.
With off the shelf trading education, nobody at any prop firm or bank will give two damns about how many classes you took. Why? Because there is no way they can tell how well you did (no transcript), and there is no such thing as accredited trading education, unlike business schools.
Granted, not everyone will get admitted to the top schools, and the cost of a diploma is not small (around $100,000 at a top school). But we can get an education at a less competitive school, and who’s to say the quality there will be worse than at an average trading education firm (especially if we consider the price these lesser schools charge as opposed to a trading education firm)? There are some local state schools that will charge you $400 a credit for a Masters in Finance (X 40 credits, works out to $16,000). That’s a steal compared to trading education by the hour, and some of these schools are of a pretty good reputation.
Fine, you say, I don’t care about working for a bank or a prop firm, I want to trade retail and that’s it. Great, but then we bump into the next problem. How do I know that Masters of the Market LLC is giving me quality education? By their price? By reviews? By audited account statements that attest to years of consistent performance in varying market conditions? Nobody seems to have the latter available. What ends up happening is that most people end up falling for marketing glitz.
In my opinion, the basics of how to read the market and all the bread and butter strategies of trading (trend following, range plays, etc) are all available on the internet for free. I think if you need somebody to teach you technical analysis, you are wasting money.
Likewise, there is no substitute for screen time. Observing the market, noting the patterns and behaviors, no instructor can give that to you.
The place where I think professional coaching comes in is the psychological end of trading, getting somebody to help you optimize your strategy and execution, help you in the fine points of trading which make the biggest difference in your PnL.