Guys, hate re-visiting the past, but sometimes thatâs how we learn.
One thing I have disliked about COT, the mantra is to look for extremes, the thinking is valid, if itâs an extreme then the positioning must have changed at that level previously, therefore there is an increased likelihood of a change now.
For me there is a randomness attached to that, like the chairman making the call, context can and often does overrule. Sometimes when I look at price I can instinctively know that commercials are at an extreme, yet context will tell me not to buy, price is falling like a stone.
Finally, it takes a horrible market action on CHF to focus what it is Iâm looking for in the commercialsâ actions and the COT data.
The futures only report, the commercials net long positions at the last âreversalâ of their positions - remember the study where it was recognized that the commercials will entice the specs to take the trade (we posted about that maybe 6 months ago).
Such an enticement occurred on Dec 7, the Comms were on a steady long CHF 34000 to 36000, no reason to change that, then suddenly a reported drop in their longs by 50% to 18,000 on Dec 14 - this was the enticement - what possible reason was there for the commercials to ditch their CHF longs.
The key to all of this is what then followed - within one week they had increased their longs back to 32,000, and then, continued to 42,307 the week reported before Thursday past.
Now they were back to extreme levels for the past year, but now there is context to those levels, the thrust of SNB is to maintain a level against Euro, their main trading partner, that same partner who is destined to introduce QE.
Now I can sense the reason for the extreme, now I can see the âenticementâ or âmanipulationâ or whatever a person wishes to call it.
Brings COT to life ![:slight_smile: :slight_smile:](https://forums.babypips.com/images/emoji/twitter/slight_smile.png?v=5)