If you only have 5G you’ll have to trade with a bucket shop like the rest of us. Don’t worry but, there’s some good ones out there.
1 Like
Interbank access starts from $1M I guess because if you trading doesn’t generate enough commission or brokers they won’t simply keep you on their platform.
As alternative you can try your feet with a brokers that hedge your orders using prime liquidity like lmax, currenex, etc. Try to find brokers that aggregate such LP’s and offer tightest spreads and best liquidity.
Among my recommendations are Tickmill, Hotforex, IC Markets. FXCM was good, but their problems with regulators scary me.
@caster27, James makes a great point.
You mentioned you are “tirelessly looking for is a real ecn broker that will not try and scam” you as if any non-ECN broker must be a scam.
It’s worth noting that for institutional traders, FOREX.com’s parent company GAIN Capital offers ECN solutions through the GTX marketplace. However, at the retail level, FOREX.com has always been open about our role as the market maker for the trades placed by our clients.
We feel no reason to hide this fact, because at retail trade sizes, we believe market making is the best way to provide customers with reliable pricing while effectively managing our own risk. We are fully accountable for every execution and don’t outsource that responsibility to a third party.
So here it is folks, the FX Brokers business model, an honest (the one) Broker fully acknowledging that they are on the other side of the trade. They can see your positions, margins, balances, your complete trading history and every trade is counted by the very operation you are trading with. Their MO is to increase profitability at your expense.
This is why 95% of traders get smashed and lose money in FX. Sure a large percentage have poor trading ability and money management skills but a significant percentage are beaten by the very company and platform they are trading with.
Retail ECN is a fantasy, Its all just one giant video game that takes real money and hurts real people.
3 Likes
You must have a good level of experience to start noticing unfair broker actions. Majority of cases the thief is market, because large players are extremely good at manipulation.
@Trendswithbenefits unfortunately, you’re not alone in having this misconception about market makers.
The reality is whenever you place a forex trade, there needs to be a market maker taking the other side since it’s an over-the-counter (OTC) market. Furthermore, market making is not exclusive to forex. You can visit the websites of several of the biggest futures and stock exchanges in the world to read about how they rely on market makers to provide liquidity and quality pricing.
While we do not actively trade against our clients, it’s true that as a market maker, we manage the risk on the other side of customer orders. It’s also true that we have many tools at our disposal to do this, and that’s a good thing for our clients.
We’ve automated every aspect of the trade process, with the goal of ensuring your trades are executed as fast as possible at the price you expect – or better. In 2016 we consistently executed 99.9% of trades on our FOREXTrader platforms in less than 1 second*, with an average execution speed of just 50 milliseconds, and over 66%* of limit orders received price improvement**. We have established a set of standards we use to measure execution quality for FOREX.com, and we publish execution statistics on a monthly basis.
*Execution speed represents the time it takes our execution engine to execute your trade once it has been received by the execution engine. This does not represent the time it take from when a customer clicks trade on the platform and when they receive their confirmation. **Execution Price statistics exclude instances where multiple limit orders were placed in the same account for the same instrument at the same price. ***Excludes trades that received non-standard order processing.
While that’s true, it’s also true that we operate in a highly regulated environment, with strong oversight into trading practices and execution. For example, as a US-regulated broker, FOREX.com provides the NFA with details of the transactions initiated by our retail forex customers, and must adopt and enforce procedures designed to ensure the integrity of trades and to ensure trades are executed at market on our various platforms. We are fully accountable for every execution – as a market maker, we don’t outsource that responsibility to a third party. If you ever have any questions or concerns post-trade, we’ll address it directly.
For 2016, approximately 98% of our average daily retail segment trading volume was either naturally hedged (buyers of a currency pair being offset with sellers) or hedged by us with one of our liquidity providers. Therefore, the idea we are actively trading against our customers is inherently false.
We take customer satisfaction seriously. If a market maker undermined its clients’ success would lose its clients. A key reason FOREX.com has grown to become one of the largest forex brokers in the US over the past 18 years is because our customers value the service we provide as their market maker.
FOREX.com and all other US-regulated brokers are required to calculate actual profitability stats each quarter and make them available to the public, our customers, and the CFTC and NFA. For the calendar quarter ending June 30, 2017, there were 34,911 active non-discretionary trading accounts of which 31% were profitable and 69% unprofitable. These percentages are in line with much of the industry.
Trading carries a high risk, but we believe FOREX.com being a market maker is the best way to reliably and transparently service our customers.
4 Likes
As a market marker, do you also make money from the financing of the trade position?
For example, if I have a trade with 10 standard lots, that’s a rotational value of $1M. At 50:1 margin, I only have to put up $20,000. Doesn’t the market market offer me a “credit line” to access the remaining $980,000. And rather than the market maker put up this money themselves, it finances it and simply marks up what it costs to borrow.
Forex.com, I appreciate the depth and transparency of your response to my post.
There’s no misconception going on here.
As is in your T&C’s (RE; release of info to 3rd Parties) there is nothing stopping you exposing your client base’s overall open volumes and positions to your LP (possibly a condition of supply) so as giving them the opportunity to flatten their risk. Hence when all screen indicators show that the price should be moving down the price suddenly moves (or spikes) up, taking back as much liquidity as possible before moving back to the original direction.
It’s also interesting that as a Broker you hedge to flatten risk, yet retail hedging was banned in the US by the regulators, obviously the LP cannot take your funds if you hedge as well, “don’t play us at our own game.”
The fact that your Broker can see your positions is very concerning. Scam, not quite, but climb on a ladder and you will be able to see one from there.
I now understand why once I open a position that it instantly goes against me. It’s my Brokers algorithm scrambling to flatten its risk by placing a trade(s) against my position. Some of the “FX Dreamers” on this site seem to think it’s an illusion.
Ok, let’s do the math, so ~ 24,000 clients lost money and ~ 11,000 made a profit in the second quarter of this year.
Now lets “guestimate” that a large percentage of the 24k are newish traders who are trading 0.01 or 0.05 positions say 5 times a week. Commission / Spread values are approximately £0.01 to £0.08 per trade. So in that quarter the new trader is only spending ~£2.50 per 12 week Qtr, with you if he wins 50% of his positions.
Now if you educate that trader to take long safe stops (say 50 - 80 pips) on 0.01 or 0.05 lots, then working in conjunction with your LP to move the market (we have already confirmed that price is set by the LP, not the Market) algorithm to flatten as much risk as possible. You only have to hit the traders stop twice a week (~£3.50ea) and you have increased your take from the trader to £42.00 per 12 week Qtr.
So what’s best for business, £2.50 x 24,000 = £60,000 or £42.00 x 24,000 = £1,000,000
Very rough figures which doesn’t include the traders that don’t use stops and lose far more per trade than £3.50!!
You can understand what this shows. Basically their exposure is a third of their base.
Like throwing down £100.00 on a craps table knowing the due diligence shows you’re only risking £30.00
Possibly why so many MM Brokers are opening for business every month, it’s a 6 Billion a day operation using FIAT pricing that is near impossible to regulate properly because trades do not take place on an open ECN market but more of a casino style video game and it’s an extremely lucrative model.
Sounds like you need to learn to trade pal, ironic given your username. Your scepticism is what feeds the retail markets, all be it amusing but fundamentaly incorrect. You sound exceptionally insecure with what your doing here, my guess is that this has a negative impact on your trading.
I especially like the part where you say “trades go immediately against you every time because your broker is scrambling it’s algorithm”! 
I love the Internet sometimes.
Thanks James. But the trading is just fine. I use a Grid based system so I don’t give a s*&t which way they push the market.
“Fundamentally incorrect” ehh, which bit James? Forex.com confirmed everything I stated.
Bye the way, false hope feeds the retail markets, scepticism saves people from getting burned, you know that.
1 Like
Ahhh the good old grid approach, and we all know how they work out long term - plain statistics should tell you that 
The problem with skepticism, in general, is that it’s really based on opinions, it’s misguided advice to traders who don’t understand but want to understand the underlying market dynamics.
Some examples from your previous post being:
- Brokers colluding with LPs
- Brokers aiming to move price
- Brokers having algo’s moving the market immediately against you.
- LPs ultimately driving price, not liquidity
Is this your view on all retail brokers, or perhaps just those that are MM?
We take ownership of our postions and don’t blame “the market”.
It is but an illusion.
3 Likes
Directional Grid EA guided by the CCI, very profitable when used with built in Equity Protection. Price continually going up and down plays into this strategy.
So that’s how it works, undermine their trading technique when unable to prove your point, with emojis, really.
Not TRUE ECN, they are properly regulated, all MM yes, maybe you can explain the Hedging ban for the US based?
FXCM US was busted for having a hidden vested interest its liquidity provider, another illusion perhaps.
No illusion Bob, place a trade, price reverses 2-3 pips for 5 - 15 seconds until returning to original price.
That’s why I use the EA, I don’t get fooled by the randomness of price action.
No illusion, 2-3 pip reversal? Just imagine the arbitrary scalping that you could have taken advantage of… free money @_bob!!
By the way TWB, it’s refreshing to see that you can take some light ‘stick poking’, it’s all clean fun and nothing personal. Much to go around in these forums 
Oh and we like free money @RISKonFX.
If only it was that easy @Trendswithbenefits. As we said bro, we take ownership to our trade decisions. Thats why we don’t need to grid trade. PA is random but then it also has momentum. Each to their own however.
Barely covers the spreads and commission’s boys, not interested arbitrary scalping 2-3 pips.
Can we keep this thread on topic instead of discussing each other’s trading approach?
Totally agree ForexGump. It’s like death, it’s not a topic BP X-Men, Industry types or Educators like to see displayed for all to see. Attack it or change the subject to deviate the discussion away from what might actually be the reality of Retail FX.
Most posts questioning the FX Industry are very short discussions around here.
Great question @TradingPanda
To answer properly, it’s first important to explain how margin trading in forex (and futures) differs from margin trading in stocks.
With stocks, when you trade on margin, you put up a fraction of the value for the shares you purchase, and your stock broker lends you the remaining amount of money needed to buy the stock. For example, if you wanted to buy $100,000 worth of AAPL on margin, you could put up $50,000, and your stock broker would lend you the remaining $50,000. They would charge you interest for this loan.
With forex (and futures), when you trade on margin, you put up a fraction of the value for the currency position you take, but your forex broker (or futures commission merchant) does not lend you any money. That’s because the margin you put up in forex (and futures) acts as a good faith deposit. For example, in the US, the margin requirement to trade EUR/USD is 2%. Assuming an exchange rate of 1.1500[0] for EUR/USD, that’s $2300 required margin to open a standard lot (100K) position in EUR/USD, since 100,000 euros would be equivalent to 115,000 US dollars at that exchange rate.
While forex brokers don’t lend you money to trade on margin, you can earn or pay rollover interest on trading positions you hold from one day to the next. In the 24-hour currency market, 5pm New York Time marks the cutoff between the end of one trading day and the start of the next. That means, if you hold an open position through the 5pm cutoff, it will be rolled over to the next trading day, and you will earn or pay rollover interest accordingly.
The screenshot above was taken from the Current Rates window of our FOREXTrader platform this Tuesday. It shows you could have earned 52 cents in rollover interest for holding a mini lot (10K) short position in EUR/USD that day at 5pm or about $5.20 for a standard lot (100K). Notice there’s a spread between the amount of rollover interest you would earn for being short EUR/USD and the amount you would pay for being long. Forex brokers make money from this rollover interest spread, and you will find FOREX.com spreads on rollover interest are competitive.
You may find this earlier discussion on rollover interesting (pun intended) Can someone explain to me what rollover interest is?
4 Likes