Going offshore to escape the CFTC

Very simple math indeed. And let’s not complicate things by introducing the more obvious real life costs

real life brokerage operating costs

add a few more real life elements that affect [bucketshop] brokerage’s cost of doing business
Assuming the typical bucketshop will not invest $100k for a new mt4/mt5 license +
$15-20k monthly in server expenses, they are likely going to white label mt4 for $5k + 1.7k MQ monthly fees. The white labeler may also have additional service fees, but let’s just add $2.3k and make it even $4k/month. The white labeler has given us permission to use our own feeds also, so we can do a/b hybrid book (or 100% b book if you want).

You will need a risk management engine of some kind. If you aren’t sending flow to your white labeler, then you must have software to do real-time analytics of how much risk you have on either book at any given time. $1k+ and/or based on volume/included with bridge.

Compliance/dealing staff salary + benefits. $6-8+k/month for yourself + 2 full time people minimum. White labeling will save you some money here, but again, you might be subject to monthly minimum flow.

Cost to whitelabel/source legitimate price feeds. Technically each broker makes their own price, but if it deviates too far from the “real” price, then price arbitrage opportunities will abound or people will not use your services because the cost is too high.

Cost to bridge liquidity from PoP. $0 for bucketshop. But $2.5-$4.00 R/T is not uncommon depending on volume. Remember that there may be costs for additional price feeds even if you do not send any actual flow.

Cost of acquisition / advertising / etc between $300-$1500 per client or more

Adverse selection. Active traders are likely to be informed (which is why they are active and will continue to be active). If you are only internalizing risk, you are pretty screwed as you have no way to offload risk to a larger wholesaler. Or you’d have to have massive spreads.

Assuming you have 100 active clients trading 10 lots per day with $5k starting balance, this would imply that those active clients are profitable on average [details=clients Not profitable example] (if clients were not profitable, they could only continue to pay commissions for
$4 r/t x 10 lots/day x 63 trading days = -$2520 x 100 clients = -$252,000, assuming they average breakeven across all trades.
Losses would be much faster if they are losing 2+ pips on every trade.

($4 r/t x 10 lots/day x 10 trading days) + (-$20 two pip loss x 10 trades/day x 10 trading days) = -$400 + -$2000 = -$2400.* They would either quit or have insufficient margin to continue to open trades :smirk:.
-$240,000 if it is 100 clients in only 10 days.
[/details]


Lets say $20 per lot r/t profit (2 pips).

$20/lot profit x 10 r/t lots/day x 20 trading days = $4000 x 100 clients = $400,000 profit to clients

$400,000 - $80,000 = $320,000 net profit due to 100 traders…or $3,200 per trader. It’s a good chance that profitable traders are going to request regular withdrawals. Especially with a new broker. If 1/2 of the client base choose to withdraw profits…

$3,200 x 33 (1/3 of 100 clients) = $105,600 [-$25,600 broker profit]

$3,200 x 50 (1/2 of 100 clients) = $160,000 [-$80,000 broker profit]

Where are the the trader profits paid from? If the broker takes on the risk, then the broker has to pay from its "winnings"

You could argue that the broker could just simply increase their commission. But then like any other product, you must compete with other brokers. So unless you have some unique execution or pricing (which the average bucketshop likely would not), why should we trade with your brokerage?

In reality, you will have a handful of clients that even trade >=10 lots daily higher. Most will likely trade <5 lots/ month.


Very few offshore retail brokers will have this let alone accept US clients. As I predicted several years ago, nearly all of the brokers that initially told the US CFTC to F-off eventually “bent the knee.” The ones that still accept US clients are either doing so very quietly or are fraudulent brokerages who fake legit operations in a major jurisdiction. At least Trader’s Way and Tallinex was honest about where they operate from. Many of the brokers on the current list (TurnKeyFx, FinPro) go out of their way to fake a popular jurisdiction or not reveal their regulatory status at all.

Majority of the owners/management of these types of brokers come from the gaming/casino industry and have no intention to act like a real financial services provider. Churning/burning clients are much easier for them. And they do not have to pay out any actual profits.

Summary

This text will be hidden

1 Like

seems like are already running a bucket shop. Is that the reason you find our list of brokers not worth your money :wink:

Regardless, I have no intentions to continue a conversaion with you. PERIOD.

1 Like

EASTER FRIDAY BANK HOLIDAYS FOREX SPREADS

For FinProTrading and TurnkeyForex, here are the spreads
as the London Session period expires on a very dead day
as we speak…

There are some which are untradably wide, but overall, its
not bad. These are U.S. friendly brokers, as previously
discussed.

hyperscalper

symbol min , avg , max spread pips
AUDCAD, 2.2 , 2.9 , 3.3 ###
AUDCHF, 1.8 , 3.4 , 5.9 ###
AUDJPY, 1.6 , 2.1 , 2.7 ##
AUDNZD, 4.4 , 4.6 , 5.0 #####
AUDUSD, 0.7 , 1.1 , 1.4 #
CADCHF, 1.6 , 2.3 , 4.2 ##
CADJPY, 1.2 , 1.7 , 3.3 ##
CHFJPY, 2.4 , 3.0 , 6.0 ###
EURAUD, 3.3 , 3.5 , 3.8 ####
EURCAD, 1.1 , 2.0 , 3.1 ##
EURCHF, 1.6 , 1.7 , 2.3 ##
EURGBP, 1.2 , 1.5 , 1.7 #
EURJPY, 0.8 , 1.1 , 1.4 #
EURNZD, 6.6 , 7.5 , 8.4 #######
EURUSD, 0.1 , 0.4 , 0.6
GBPAUD, 5.2 , 5.8 , 6.5 ######
GBPCAD, 4.6 , 5.8 , 6.4 ######
GBPCHF, 4.0 , 6.9 , 21.0 #######
GBPJPY, 3.2 , 4.1 , 4.5 ####
GBPNZD, 1.0 , 8.0 , 13.0 ########
GBPUSD, 2.6 , 3.0 , 3.2 ###
NZDCAD, 4.3 , 5.3 , 6.4 #####
NZDCHF, 3.2 , 3.9 , 4.6 ####
NZDJPY, 3.2 , 3.8 , 4.7 ####
NZDUSD, 2.7 , 3.0 , 3.3 ###
USDCAD, 1.3 , 1.8 , 2.0 ##
USDCHF, 1.2 , 1.4 , 1.7 #
USDJPY, 0.3 , 0.4 , 0.6

Scalping is the main strategy, but trade executions
are just fine…

1 Like

I’ve been reading these posts on turnkey and after speaking to them I’m informed they are not regulated. Was this not a requirement to be one of the trusted offshore brokers?

it makes me think of inovatrade in 2011

@codybear we know – review the first post of this discussion. The fact that Turnkey isn’t regulated is why we’re reviewing them on here. Other off-shore brokers just won’t accept US clients now (with just a hand-full of exceptions).

Update on CCM: I contacted my PAMM account manager and asked for an update and for the accounting manager to contact me. I’ve been assured that WITHDRAWALS are still being processed but that it’s very slow and mine is in queue. They haven’t given a time-frame so I don’t know if I’ll be waiting 1wk or 3mo.

Hello xxxx,

You probably already heard from Kris that we’ve been experiencing some issues with our bank. Due to changes in their internal policies (which we understand relate to tighter banking controls in general), they’re requesting additional information and documents for almost all withdrawals we process. We’ve been collaborating with the bank in order to provide the requested details and documents, however it takes time for us to collect the required information and for them to check that all is in order. We’re trying to process withdrawals in the order they were requested, but due to these additional checks and limits the bank has imposed, many withdrawals are still queued, including yours.

We’re sorry for the inconveniences and delays this is causing. Please understand that the withdrawals are being processed, just not as fast as we and our clients would like. We believe that this issue will be resolved soon. Unfortunately, we cannot provide you with an exact time frame, also because today and on Monday the bank is closed due to Easter holidays.

Best regards,

Emma Olsen

Capital City Markets Limited
Vantu House, 133 Santina Parade
Elluk, Port Vila, Efate
Vanuatu

t: +44-207-442-5903
e: [email protected]

While I’m happy that things are supposedly still moving I don’t like that they can’t give me a time-frame. After no updates for 5 days I’ve sent the below response.

Hello Emma,

Thank you for your response.

Can you please provide me with a time line on when my wires (Request ID xxxx and xxxx) will be processed and sent? Request ID xxxx has been in queue since February and this is taking unacceptably long. I also have PAMM accounts at CCM and because of the withdrawal delays my investors are considering withdrawing their funds. This will be a loss to both CCM and to me, and I would like to avoid this! Wire transfers do not take this long, so I cannot understand why this hasn’t been sorted out by now. I do not understand what amount of documentation your bank would be requiring that would slow withdrawals down this much.

Please be more transparent on why this is taking so long, what your team is doing to expedite the process, and what changes are being made to assure this doesn’t happen again in the future.

Also, please provide me with a timeline for completion and expedite the process where possible.

Best,
FinancialWorld

I’m pushing them for answers, transparency and a timeline of when they’re going to take care of this. The delays are already costing me, and have actually run me short on cash.

I’ll let you all know if/when things are resolved.

Best,
FW

inovatrade had rave reviews for 2 yrs prior to mike alcocer shutting it down overnight and walking away with the funds of over 1000 traders that totaled almost 200 million…they even sponsored a golf tournament a couple months prior to the shut down thereby luring in even more money…
unregulated should be Thee biggest red flag to not include them…

yes I understand its up to each individual to do their own full due diligence themselves and decide but lets include the disasters from the past.

alcocer is serving 17.5 yrs in federal prison for this but not one cent was recovered…unregulated is gambling

1 Like

@codybear - you are correct, and yes that’s something I worry about. I think that’s part of the risk we take on when we go off-shore. Obviously we don’t want to be stupid, which is why I’ve found this thread so helpful. I think it’s important to look at the structure of the broker as well. CCM splits investor’s funds between 6+ major banks and only minimal at CCM to post margin. Here’s the breakdown with one of my accounts:

Turnkey on the other hand states that:

Safety of Funds
Turnkey Forex ensures the protection of client funds. We are able to distinguish client money from the firms’ own money by holding the client money in a segregated client bank account, held with an approved banking institution.

In the unlikely event that Turnkey Forex enters into liquidation, all funds in segregated client bank account held with our bank will not be affected by such a default and will remain for the benefit of the relevant client.

Now I haven’t found out who this “bank” is, but segregation of funds is very important when dealing with off-shore and unregulated brokers.

Agree? Thoughts?

1 Like

when pressed for the information of the bank name where client funds are held, turnkey will not tell you…the only answer I received was we dont disclose that information…
Even inovatrade released the banks name…I’d be curious as to Where the refunds from turnkey come from and the account name…

anyone get a refund from them? What bank was it drawn on?

if you have account with finpro trading and want to do a wire transfer to there bank USD this is what you get:

Company Name :TurnkeyFX (UK) LTD

Bank Name: HSBC

Sort Code

Bank Account Number

IBAN

SWIFT/BIC Code

and where does the refund come from?

Regarding Trade.com and its parent company, CySEC just fined them with EUR 30,000. According to the regulator the sanction was imposed because the company has not acted honestly, fairly and professionally in accordance with the best interests of its clients in Romania.

i have not fund my finpro account because im still confuse on some things like there relationship and when will the U.K. authoritiest find out there is a unregulated broker operation in the EU / the U.K. and what will be the penalty

TURNKEYFOREX.COM AND FINPROTRADING.COM

These are two competitive brokerages using a common
service provider. When you ask “what will be the penalty”,
what “penalty” are you expecting for using these brokers?

Do you think it is “illegal” in your local jurisdiction??

You will have 400:1 leverage (on request) on funds, so
that reduces the funds levels you’ll need to maintain at
the brokerage.

You get the very best performance and reliability (although
there was a VERY RARE outage yesterday… knock on my wooden
head…) LOL so I don’t see the downside of this “regulatory
threat” being proposed.

hyperscalper

there operation in a country that require every forex broker be regulated, it’s like operating a forex broker in the U.S. sooner or later the regulators will find out, altho there register as another type of business. lets not be stupid here

and BTW turnkeyforex is HEADQUARTERS in the U.K. but there is no register company at the compnay house, this is where you find every compnay thats register in the u.k. and turnkey forex can’t be find nowhere, only finpro trading and turnkeyfx can be found

OK, well I’d say “let’s wait and see what happens…” and
then we’ll know what’s going to happen.

hyperscalper

One of our members sent me a copy of an email she received from Trader’s Way regarding problems with a credit/debit card processor she had used to make deposits to her account.

This sounds suspiciously like the problem she and others encountered with CCM last fall
(a problem which has never been resolved to anyone’s satisfaction).

I’m posting a copy of the email here, and asking Trader’s Way clients to write back and tell us whether you have received a similar email, and whether you can shed any light on what’s going on there.

Here is the email –

– click the image to enlarge it –

yeah i got the email, i have deposit by CC but the difference with capitalcitymarkets is that tradersway got there money i believe, because i made a withdraw using another method and it went thru with no problem.