just read a pro trader say never risk more than 1% of your trading acct. on a trade… is this true?? Seems very low…
Have a look at the comments on risk on the FXCM.com site. Very informative, especially their webinars.
There are some factors which go into that decision, but it’s definitely not a bad starting point for someone getting started. Heck, I’d probably even suggest going lower than that.
Generally speaking, risk only what you can afford to lose.
Regarding that advice, 1% seems reasonable to me as well.
It depends on your perspective.
This is one of the (many) issues on which there are two widely differing consensuses of opinion: if you ask “forex traders in general” you’ll get one answer, whereas if you ask the tiny minority of “people making a living through trading forex” you’ll get a very different answer, which will be a much lower figure. (I don’t mean necessarily “much lower than 1%”, just “much lower than the figure provided from the first group”.) There are reasons for that.
There are ways of working out what appropriate “staking”/“risk-exposure” is, for your methods, according to your win-rate, profit factor and your degree of risk aversion.
There’s an inverse correlation, overall, between the figure people will give and their degree of experience. To new/aspiring traders with very little experience, 1% typically seems too low. To the successful “hardened old pro’s”, it seems too high.
Here are the two important things to be aware of …
-
It doesn’t matter what the consensus of opinion is: what matters is what’s appropriate for you, your trading, your methods, your edge, your maximum foreseeable “bad patch of results”, and so on. [I][U]You need to learn how to work this out for yourself[/U][/I]. And here’s the book from which you can do so: [I]Profitability & Systematic Trading[/I] (Michael Harris, Wiley 2007).
-
Be aware that the “longest predictable losing patch” is much more important than the “longest predictable losing run”. Long, consecutive losing runs are very rare. “Patches” of “being unlucky” and having a handful of losers followed by a single win, then another handful of losers followed by a single win, then another handful of losers, are very common. So don’t work out your answer, regarding appropriate risk-exposure, in accordance with the “longest predictable losing run” and hope for the best. That idea has undone a [B][U]lot[/U][/B] of people’s accounts.