I have started trading a new system in November and came out with around a 30% win rate, but I still made a very small profit of around 1%. This strategy trades reversals with divergences against the current timeframe trend. When I look back at my trades, I can see that a lot of the losers were the ones that I did not trade with the trend on the higher timeframes. So for example, my results tell me that I should only take bullish divergences on the 1 hour timeframe of EURUSD, because the 4h, Daily and Weekly charts are generally bullish.
Do you think that if I trade with the higher timeframe trend for this month that my win rate should improve? I know I said from my trades that it looks like this is the case, but can anyone confirm this with their own experience?
Excellent reply, thank you. I took around 20 swing trades in November (these were mostly 1 hour and 4 hour timeframes) and I did feel like I was taking too many trades, so I am happy to cut this amount down if it means taking better probability trades.
Cutting the obvious losers is hands down one of the best ways to improve profitability. While I don’t use trend based methods anymore, requiring correlation with a higher time-frame trend - assuming you define that clearly - significantly improved my win rate.
However, as @LaughingCharlie suggested, my trade signals dropped significantly, too. This makes sense if you think about it. Always requiring a higher time-frame trend means you never open a position when:
The higher time-frame is ranging; or
The higher time-frame trend is reversing (because your lower time-frame movements will be opposite to the lagging higher time-frame indicator).
Overall, my profitability was a little higher, but not nearly as much as you might think; there were simply for fewer opportunities to make money. There was also a lot of sitting around watching the markets, which does not suit my psycology.