I’m not sure where you are really going with all this
but…[quote=“Falstaff, post:19, topic:125306”]
So why would the “scammer” and the broker both refuse to communicate ?
ANSWER : i’m not sure, Logically i guess they wouldn’t, Not sure where you were going with this ?
You’re right, it’s not hard at all
Scan a good copy in
and you can do it in Photoshop or hell , even in word, Not hard at all
i’m not contesting this, of course you are correct
but there is the fact that the licence has A PHOTO on it
and the photo won’t match
but also , Brokers and Banks have a responsibility under the financial license , they can’t just do this,
if someone did do this, it would be a legal suite against the bank that they were compromised so easily
IT’S NOT THAT EASY MATE
and LET’S SAY IT DID HAPPEN
he can’t be chased for the debt, the bank would absorb the debt then sue the scammer. they would continue to chase him or just write the cost off
I’m not staring crap
but… Was this Sarcasm ?
Mate, so we are clear, I’ve put in an effort recently to be respectful to you and make sure to not say anything that may offend you
Now, this comment doesn’t actually offend me, and i’m not being a special little snowflake or a sensitive princess about it
but, I just don’t want anything to spark up… ok
I’m not really sure if you’re being Facetious or Sarcastic or am i just looking at it incorrectly because it’s text
Let me know ok
also, when you said “Professional Advice” what were you referring to (which part of what i said were you referring to) i’m just curious