So four candles on the three little pigs thread made some changes to the base system mainly by introducing a fixed stop loss of 30 pips and a target of 60 pips. I decided to incorporate this into the system and test it out and compare with his results.
My results produce a loss but his testing produced profits. Funny how I seem to automate these systems and the supposed profits all vanish. I will take my time to check his entries against mine later.
ThreelittlePigs compiling............... assets......
BackTest: ThreelittlePigs portfolio 2009..2014
Profit -2738$ MI -73$ DD 3207$ Capital 3615$
Trades 14690 Win 33% Avg -2.5p Bars 5
AR -27% PF 0.89 SR -1.11 UI 523.4% Error 13%
Generate Chart - please wait... ok
Yes. Normally what i do is to calculate the recent losses and have the lot size determined by a fixed/variable “Recovery distance”. This recovery distance is usually the avg profit distance. Any extra of this distance will generate profit + past losses recovery.
I do have positive experiences with this on trend based system. But do tread carefully with martingale as they are not very forgiving in most systems.
I have read only bad things about martingale based money management and position sizing systems. I will do some reading and see if the research and data support the assessions the masses make. Will definitely look into incorporating your suggestion and see.
Not sure if you’ve programmed it, but Huck also closes her trades when an EMA crossover occurs in the opposite direction. It’s not strictly closed based on trailing stops.
IE:
From her New System for 2012: Trend-Catcher 3.0 page:
Long at 1.2956, closed at 1.2928 (-28 pips) when a new crossover materialized.
Short at 1.2928, closed at 1.2937 (-9 pips) when a new crossover materialized.
Long at 1.2937, closed at 1.3027 (+90 pips) when a new crossover materialized.
The Amazing Crossover Strategy also mentions to always move your S/L after you are in profit so that you break even.