mhm, you just proved that I am right and this whole conversation was useless
2 Likes
So are you lol and please do not continue replying i have important things to do.
1 Like
although I know you will not learn but static rule based strategies are usually dealing with fixed phenomenon for example when the M! of 5 cuts the MA of 15 bullish, enter but, these things are fixed and not subjectve and these strategies are proven to be nonfunctional. not if you wanna trade based on these that is your choice but do not inform others with so much confidence. put urself in their shoes and feel it, they are here to get valid information not your idea on anything! so talk based on facts or stay quite before making them lose their money. thanks
1 Like
proven to nonfunctioal where? which time frames, which markets, which time zones, which data
period, which combination of all above, right now you are misinform people
3 Likes
Thanks for pointing this out, Greg. 
You are right (obviously), and right to warn other people (obviously), but it becomes tiresome, doesn’t it? In these discussions with Vasil, several of us have stopped even bothering to respond to all the misinformation. That doesn’t help anyone else (as your posts do) but at least it avoids arguments.
It’s a frustrating and difficult situation, though. 
3 Likes
I am hardly trying to get a clear idea on anything any of these two say lol. how do you find any of these useful? Like static rules are mechanic? and the other Vasil guy does not even provide any information, and I hope I am not making that worse but what I am seeing here is that the professor one is not admitting that static rules are static 
and how do you find any of these useful? Are you two mates or is there anything I am missing?
2 Likes
man just stop acting like that. so now it is clear that static rule based strategy is not subjective? The qustion you ask needs a wise one to understand its answer i do not talk at that level with you until you say dynamic is static that waste of time.
1 Like
I am saying a lot of information, check the text and say again!
1 Like
You are just pointing out to others false information and you are not giving any! I personally am not looking to find what is wrong; I need information on how to trade and how to be profitable! This information is not beneficial for me or for any other trader!
1 Like
You say this is not useful and also you say I point out when people are saying wrong information. it is you dont know what is useful or you dont know false information in trading can make people lose money! i do not say how you trade because i know trading is hard and people should find way on their own. i do not try to be a smart ass or show i am know-it-all. i could also tell people like: ohhh if you trade with RSI indicator you win big time because that is nothing like that!!! look at other peoples post and comments, this professor for example i promise he is even good with giving you signals for trade and i am again sure that you lose all you money. choose yourself!
Lol, no, not at all.
We are in no sense “mates”: I have never had any contact with Greg at all, not here or anywhere else, not even a private message.
Our approaches to trading actually couldn’t be more different: Greg is into EAs, automation, CFDs, indicators, and MT; I dislike all of these, for myself, and am into price action, futures and non-MT platforms.
I still have plenty of respect for Greg, and I know he’s very good at what he does, and I think that our attitudes to forum-posting are pretty similar: we both try to help people; we both dislike misinformation; we both dislike opinionated, ill-informed posts.
So I am a supporter of Greg anyway, in the ways that matter for the forum and for the benefit of its other members. I think! 
1 Like
He’s never given any trading signals and his advice is solid. He will still be here long after you’re gone, I guarantee that.
3 Likes
This is for sure. That one is a “safe-bet trade”. 
2 Likes
With the quality of members here, I agree! LOL
a friendly challenge. how about we both share our last 10 days tradings? words do not show experiance , actions do.
I will be waiting for you. and i think it is very possible you do not see a very important thing. check my risk/reward %. and i was busy lately. so i did not make my usual rate trade.
well well well now we are talking.
Come on dude this is getting hot LOL I am waiting for you
ok, let’s start from the beginning, I understand static rules as fixed MA14 RSI 22 means not subjective, even if you think that there are some “golden fixed phenomenon numbers” - basically, I don’t know how it might be works, same settings on all markets?, at the end is a human which superwise it, that is the biggest problem. Traders in the turtle traders experiment achieved different results because of emotions, they have to stick with the plan and even tho some of them fail.
according to this, you just wrote some conditions but nothing about markets, time frames
static rules are part of mechanic trade
what do you want to show me, one profitable week, take out from context? trading is a marathon not one week sprint.
hahahahaha, good one 
choose any week that you thingyou did your best, I will accept that with all my heart
also this is my work RN. if you are a trader you know traders do not reveal full history because their strategy is their signature; yet i believe you do not know
I think it’s time to summarize the part about permanent rules in trade. I have provided you with an example that clearly explains the impact of emotions on trading despite having proven entry and exit rules. I think we can end this topic. According to my results and trading history, I have a trading journal at BP , it’s public and available on my profile or use “search” function, there are strategies where you can’t extract 100% trading rules from profit/ loss information. This is my last post in this topic, I answered all questions and doubts. Regards Greg
1 Like