OK - well - still getting ‘analysis paralysis’ (and it’s costing me a fortune on cell phone bills but anyway)!!!
As you know I’m STILL on my Parabolic SAR ‘quest’ and I think I’ve come up with something interesting yet simple.
It only addresses ONE (maybe TWO) of the THREE MAJOR PROBLEMS with Parabolic SAR:
1 - Late entry which in turn results in:
2 - Huge drawdown if the trade goes against you (initially)
The ‘fix’ for the above (I believe) COULD be the following:
You enter THE MOMENT Parabolic SAR is penetrated i.e. you are NOT waiting for a new dot to appear in the opposite direction for entry / stop and reverse. You INITIAL STOP LOSS becomes the high or low of this candle where you have just entered (depending of whether you are long or short). Because Parabolic SAR has been penetrated it follows that a new Parabolic SAR dot will appear upon the opening of the next candle. You are now ALREADY in a position. Wait for THIS candle to close and your stop loss now becomes the high or the low of THIS candle (again depending on whether you are long or short). Keep this stop loss value (it is a stop loss NOT a stop and reverse point) UNTIL Parabolic SAR overtakes this value and then start tracking / locking in you profits.
Make sense???
This has been one of my MAJOR ‘bugbears’ with Parabolic SAR i.e. sometimes the initial Parabolic SAR dot (and therefore your initial stop loss) is MILES away from your opening price and if the trade goes against you at this point it can cost you a fortune!!! If you have a look back somewhere on this thread you’ll find one of my MAJOR ‘fuc*up’ trades (it was GBP/CAD if I’m not mistaken) that cost me over $8K because of this problem and that was ONE trade (and - as a matter of fact - that was the beginning of a HUGE losing streak if I’m not mistaken i.e. things just got progressively worse from there because I then started looking at all sorts of other things none of which worked out).
This is not rocket science (and I don’t know why it’s taken me SO long to see this either). From what I can see it’s those Parabolic SAR trades that start out with this HUGE distance between the initial Parabolic SAR dot and the opening price of the candle giving you this Parabolic SAR dot that go against you and can quite easily wipe you out (if not financially then phsychologically and THEN financially)!!!
OK - obviously there is the chance that you are going to get whipsawed out of a good trade BUT at least the loss SHOULD be negligable and this assures that you’re still around to take the good trades when they come i.e. the trades with trends that have ‘conviction’. On the other hand - if you’re brave - you can reopen a position if and when you have a close above or below the stop loss mentioned above and see what happens. Maybe make a rule that if you get stopped out twice or three time on a single trade then walk away and wait for the next one.
There is no point in taking huge loss after huge loss and making a huge profit on another trade i.e. the two will over time cancel each other out and you’re wasting your time.
I know this goes against Parabolic SAR’s ‘design’ i.e. it’s supposed to provide you with enough room at the beginning of the trade to stop you from getting whipsawsed out of the trade BUT it would appear (especially on forex pairs) that this ‘idea’ is no longer ‘valid’ i.e. the markets move faster and ‘spike’ far more often nowadays than they did in the '70’s and I think this is where the difference comes in to play. Put it this way: if you want to see what Parabolic SAR was ‘designed for’ then just have a look at Soybeans. ‘Pure Parabolic SAR’ seems to ‘fit’ Soybeans ‘like a glove’ with no additional ‘messing around’ but take a look at ‘Pure Parabolic SAR’ on any of the indices (especially at the moment) or on forex pairs and you’ll IMMEDIATELY see what I’m talking about.
Comments???
By the way - as I’m typing this - I’m thinking!!! What about ‘modifying’ Parabolic SAR’s acceleration factor by a factor of either the current ATR or current volatility instead of a ‘fixed’ acceleration factor??? Not sure how to do it or if it’s even possible BUT just food for thought!!!