No Martin, what L-C said was;
Significantly different IMHO from the way you chose to confront the invitation.
No Martin, what L-C said was;
Significantly different IMHO from the way you chose to confront the invitation.
[EDIT : THIS ENTIRE POST HAD BEEN INTENTIONALLY DELETED BY ME (Martin K).
there was some confusion in the post,
and at the Request of @Falstaff , who brought the error to my attention,
I have agreed to remove the post in the hope that this will fix whatever the issue is.
i apologize for any inconvenience caused
and whatever was caused was not intentional or malicious on my part.
Sincerely
Martin K ]
@Falstaff
and another thing though
he also said thisā¦
followed by ā¦
soā¦ tell me IN YOUR OPINION
how do you interpret this
I INTERPRET IT AS
he is not willing to change
he doesnāt care
he just wants me to change
nowā¦ understand
Iām not being arrogant or stubborn
but iām sensing a lot of rudeness here and non co-operation
thaāts the way i interpret it
based on thisā¦
soā¦ his morals and his levels of belief of what is right and wrong tells him that Negotiation, Co-Operation and Give and Take are not options nor is compromise
and that no one on this forum should have to do any of the above
in my opinion if a person holds that belief , you canāt get anywhere and there will always be argument because a sense of negotiation or compromise does not exist.
and therefore only selfishness is present.
thatās how i see it
soā¦ how do you interpret it ? for the record
Martin - Two posts ago, (post 69) you have quoted me as saying something which I believe I never did say.
Please explain ?
@Falstaff
ok, no problem
what was that thing that i said that you believe you did not say
can you put a screenshot of it up and iāll do my best to explain it
i do realize you referenced Post 69, however i canāt see numbers on posts, i donāt know how to find them like that.
i usually rely on people to copy Quotes in
so get that to me and iāll explain whatever i saidā¦ ok
no problem
There is your reference
[Edit submitted before you denied that you can see the post numbers ]
what ???
where is the reference ?
i donāt understand
and is this supposed to be sarcasm ??
mate, i canāt see numbers ok
i really have no idea where Post 69 is ok
i didnāt DENY i SAIDā¦ i canāt see them
thereās a difference
you make it sound like iām lying.
so where is the screen of what you said you did not say
and of what i mistquoted you as saying
and ill explain it
This is it ;
PLease rectify it.
okā¦ I understand
thatās a COPY OF A QUOTE FROM YOUR POST
YOU SAID THAT
how could i copy the quote if you didnāt ?
and if i copied from the wrong person, how is your avatar there ?
Mate, you did say this
and i appreciated it (For the record)
whatās wrong with it anyway ?
HANG ONā¦ SOMETHING IS WEIRD HEREā¦
I just looked back through the posts
it would appear that @LaughingCharlie said it
as per this screenshot of the post
ok. so i guess that charlie said it
but now i donāt understand this
how can your avatar be in the original quote that i posted when charlie said it.
Iām confused
okā¦ i accept now that you did not say itā¦ fair enough
and clearly i got you and charlie confuses in all the arguments
but how does your avatar end up thereā¦ i donāt get that
ok, but in conclusion
YOU TECHNICALLY DIDNāT SAY IT
soā¦
even though i donāt understand why itās a big deal
TELL ME : WHAT WOULD YOU LIKE ME TO EDIT AND IāLL EDIT IT
Show me where I said it - I never did !
The quotation in my post was from @LaughingCharlie i believe - but you have incorporated it as being a quote from me !
PLease rectify it !
@Falstaff
ok mateā¦ Relaxā¦ we are working on itā¦ ok
i interpret this
as you being pissed offā¦ ok
clearly THIS IS A MISTAKE SOMEHOWā¦ RELAX ā¦ ITāLL BE FIXED OK
clearly it was done in error
and i still donāt know why your avatar is there, but maybe thatās what contributed to the error , maybe itās something that the script on this site does
but irrespective ITāS AN HONEST MISTAKEā¦ ok
soā¦ relax and give me a bit to look through the entire postā¦ ok
Iāll get back to you when itās done.
is that cool
Thank you mate, appreciate it
@Ben1987
thank you Ben
thatās basically all correct mate
itās what iāve been trying to say from the beginning
thank you
ok mate, Iāve just spent all that time looking through EVERY SINGLE POST ok
and trying to weed out ANYTHING that i may have misquoted you on
I think i got it all
have a look and tell me what you think
are you happy with the edit ?
let me know
also i think an explanation is in order
after reading all this
i can see what happened
i got caught up in talking to you and charlie and at one point the posts (sort of blended into one) if you know what i mean.
point isā¦ it was not malicious or intentional
it was simply done in error
i have apologized for my error
I hope this makes it cool
let me know if thereās anything elseā¦ ok
Oh let it go people.
@Falstaff
Mateā¦ itās 3am here in sydney ā¦ ok
i know youāre online
i took the time to read through the whole post ok
i got up out of bed FOR YOU
to edit WHAT YOU ASKED ME TO EDIT
the least you could do is answer my question
Iām waiting for you to respond so we can put this behind us. ok
Oh Martin.
No need to do that - mate
Youāre right - it is a defect in the software somewhere I was expecting you to work it out - mate
Hereās a freebie for the next time
Like this ;
[quote=āFalstaff, post:78, topic:130793ā]
[EDIT : THIS ENTIRE POST HAD BEEN INTENTIONALLY DELETED BY ME (Martin K).
there was some confusion in the post, [/quote]
Hope my little ājoshā didnāt upset you too much - but yes it did annoy me a little bit at the time
Thanks for the apology mate
All cool
Sleep tight
itās ok,
if it fixes the argumentā¦ No problem
ohā¦ ok, iāll try that, thanks
remember that when i came on the site had changed from what i was used to.
but thank anyway.
No problem mate
have a good one
i now deem this resolved