…of the other?
Ok, First off, I must thank everyone here for contributing to what, I feel, is a great forum. Cool vision, and a lack of ‘noise’ compared to other forums. I’ve learned so much and been inspired just by lurking…
Hopefully my first post here is useful at best, or easy at the worst for others here. If my question is yawn-yawn, I’m hoping at minimum to get a push in the right direction to a thread which may contain what I’m looking for…
OBSERVATION: I see many people talking about/using the strategy in which they enter into a trade with multiple contracts. Then, splitting the target in X parts, they set X targets usually adjusting stop loss to break even on the remaining contract/s, thus eliminating all risk on the overall trade. I’ve used this method successfully a few times, and understand it’s premise and also efficacy to a degree.
QUESTION: If price begins to move aggressively in one’s favor after entry, couldn’t one cancel their initial TP as it is approached, and swap it for a stop loss for the same net profit behind current price while moving the stop loss for the second TP to breakeven? M.O. being to potentially snag the pips already gained & continue the entire position in the event one’s initial speculation was correct. A greedy question, but one I figured should be reviewed before attempting I know many have walked the path before me.
EXAMPLE: XXX/YYY is currently trading @ 1.200 with bullish entry signal
[B]Initial[/B]
entry: 1.200 @ 2 contracts
S/L: 1.150
TP1: 1.250
TP2: 1.350 or more
[B]Modified[/B]
entry: 1.200 @ 2 contracts
S/L1: 1.200
S/L2: 1.225
TP: ??? (first sign of reversal?)
[B]Scenario[/B]- After entry, the price immediately rushes up to 1.240 and begins to slow slightly. At this point, ones initial TP is only 10 pips away. All indicators are showing more juice left in the move. If you removed the TP @ 1.250, and set a stop loss for one contract @ 1.225 this would remove the gate and “let the dog’s run” or at least shut the gate with the same net profit in the event of a reversal. Then, the remaining contract can either break even or head on to the desired TP2 level.
There’s nothing new under the sun, so I’m sure this has been discussed before, or something similar… I’m not thinking any complex math, Fibb’s, Gann’s etc, although I admit 50% retracement comes to mind. Essentially one betting on the rally continuing over price tracing back the initial sprint 50%ish.
I could see modifying one’s original plan to be going against the whole concept of discipline, and the improvisation required to manage the rest of the trade not falling into the “plan the trade, trade the plan” maxim. I also love jazz, go figure. Thoughts!?
Again, thanks to all,
Zeke Logan