Hey guys,
im new here and started to read myself into the Forex World a few days ago. Finished the School of Pipsology (which was great, i love the style of writting!), and received no my copy of “Market Wizards”.
So far it is a very motivating and interesting book, but as im new i have a few problems with some topics, added to that im not a native English speaker and this adds maybe also a few understanding problems.
It would be nice if you could help me out.
Page 122 (Interview with Paul Tudor Jones)
One thing i learned as a floor trader was that if, for example, the old high was at 56.80, there are probably going to be a lot of buy stops at 56.85. If the market is trading 70bid, 75 offered, the whole trading ring has a vested interest in buying the market, touching off those stops, and liquidating into the stops - that is a very common ring practice. As an upstairs trader, i put that together with what Eli taught me. If i want to cover a position in that type of situation, i will liquidate half at 75, so that i wont have to worry about getting out of the entire position at the point where the stops are being hit. I will always liquidate half my position below new highs or lows and remining half beyond that point.
what does he mean with “[I]touching off those stops, and liquidating into the stops[/I]”? Does he mean why buy at a lower price than the previous high and sell(liquidate) when the price gets there(previous high = stop?) again?
What is an [I]upstairs trader[/I]? Someone who goes mainly for long and seldom for short trades?
[I]“i will liquidate half at 75, so that i wont have to worry about getting out of the entire position at the point where the stops are being hit.”[/I]
I dont get this one, especially “getting out of the entire position” - what does this mean? He says that at 75 the market has an interest in buying, so why should he sell half of his positions on this point as he can expect a bullish reaction?
Page 123
In an act of bravado i told my floor broker to bid 82.90 for 100July, which at the time was a very big order. He bid 90 for 100, and I remember the Refco broker came across the pit screaming, “Sold!”. Refco owned most of the certificated stock at that time [the type of cotton available for delivery against the contract]. In an instant I realized that they intended to deliver against the July contract, which then was trading at about a 4-cent premium to the October contract.
What does “they intended to deliver against the July contract” mean?
Thank you very much for your time. I will update this post when i find more passages which make me trouble.