Time to go live

[flamingoproxy]

@kyrkar

I have positive expectancy but don’t know if the amount of trades are enough to be significant. I was risking 1% and had a win rate of 41% during August. ROI was 27.95%

but is it statistically significant?

you need to know the answer to this, because it’s the heart of the answer to your original question, isn’t it?

Going live or not?

i think so: that’s inversely proportional to how close to 50% your win-rate is with a win-rate of 50%, 100 will be a good enough sample-size, in principle but statistically speaking, 60/40 is nowhere near 50/50 and will need more than 300 samples to be even reasonably “significant” but even more important than this, is the point Greg made, above, about different types of market conditions … example: if you’re looking at a trend-following method, and the period over which you look (for h…