Hi,
Below is an example of not sticking to my plan, but giving myself a rationale to justify my actions.
On 18Nov21 I found a sh__coin opportunity - only the second one I had managed to identify since I started this strategy of sh__coin allocation back in April. The strategy says "buy a sh__coin with up to 10% of the crypto portfolio value (nominally 1% per sh__coin with an objective of having 10 of them within the first year). Hold until the price doubles, sell half of them, and keep the rest for “a very long time” with the expectation that they may eventually grow to their potential of 10X, 100X, 1,000X. The only “trade” part of this strategy was to “sell half when they double”.
So by 21Nov21 (three days later) I had identified my third sh__coin opportunity and did not want to impact the rest of my crypto portfolio by selling out any other component. At this stage, the POWR sh__coin had moved 50% in my favour. So I thought to myself "are you going to stick to your plan just because you invented “sell half of it when it doubles”, or are you going to sell half now and take a 50% profit instead of a 100% profit? I decided on, and journalled the latter. Having bought at $0.63 I sold half at $0.94 just 3 days later, and took the proceeds and bought some ONE - my third sh__coin identified.
My first sh__coin bought back in May is about half its bought value, so I am going to have to be very patient with that one (or acknowledge it will most likely tank to zero), but a 50% gain in 3 days is not something to pass up, especially if you have another trade lined up that is shouting out at you to BUY, BUY, BUY. POWR is back down to $0.74 today, so I am glad I took the decision to exit that trade. Now I wait and if it tanks I buy more.
Now about the journal. I had this a year ago, and simplified it, but I am thinking of bringing it back into my plan. It is not optimal to think of “selling half when it doubles”. That is just lazy. There is no time value of the decision. Now I am reverting back to the predecessor plan element that was never quantified - just qualified. And that is “at what time after the decision event is it worthwhile to sell?” Let’s say that when I identify a potential sh__coin, I think it may double within 3 months. So on a linear basis, I should be happy with +50% in six weeks. But when that happens in 3 days, it would not be too clever to wait until it doubles to take any profit, because if I have no history with that currency, or cannot see choppy past behaviour, it may never, ever double. I did this last year with XRP on two separate occasions, and have done it with CRO now a total of three times, and am very happy with the end results. My crypto trading plan is “in formation” rather than complete, and it is very exciting to see such opportunities opening up.
Bear in mind that this is a crypto plan, not a Forex plan, and I do not use any leverage, nor any stop losses in my crypto plan. The underlying “currencies” are volatile enough without needing leverage to make profits. And even if I wanted to set a stop loss there is nothing preventing me doing that. It is just that the “absolute loss of value with a stop loss” still does not sit easily with my psychology, and although I am comfortable taking the entry decisions, I am still not comfortable applying either leverage or stop losses to crypto trading. It is a new area for me, and so far much more “peaceful” than leveraged Forex trading.