I don’t know if you guys gonna disagree with me on this, heres my take :
News is subjective, not objective. Trying to achieve an objective analysis on something with a subjective nature is hard :
-News exists all the time. I suppose what you guys are trying to do is to look for high impact news. If you think about it, there is no such thing as ‘high impact news’. But of course, one can statistically and via experience + judgment determine which are the important ones. The chart itself already determines future price (beliefs of the participants), so trying to anticipate news is like trying to anticipate an event that is already anticipated. Why not just take things as it is?
-Take the anticipating issue one more step further; if new exists all the time and everyone else seems to be attempting to anticipate it, this means everyone’s timing of entry will be different. Everyone’s direction of entry will be different. This is due to conflicting beliefs between the participants. So who can be correct? But there must be winners and losers. Losers pay the winners. If so, its easier to determine the losers than to determine the winner. Find where the loser’s money is and take it.
-One can use frequency distributions / standard deviations / volatility statistics based off historical outcomes. See how Henry Liu does it. Forex News Trading - Henry Liu Forex. One can also do a simple study just using tick volume on a H1 chart + forexfactory news calendar indicator.
-Look to trade the reaction, not the action. News attracts the public / the prey / losers / 95% of traders. Professionals / 5% / winners often trade the other side to eat up the prey. Watch how volume forms when major news is released, then watch how price is related to the volume. Think where the major stop clusters are going to be placed (major extremes, rounded numbers, recent extremes…etc) , wait for the ‘whip’, then trade the other direction. There is no other way for big players to make money other than this.
-News often distorts ‘supply and demand’ / balanced markets / ranging bound markets. Thats why conventional indicators cannot determine news flow / direction. One must invent ‘unconventional indicators’ to do so OR think differently from the crowd. Price movement via news do actually line up totally with TA, only if one uses it correctly.
-One needs to consider money flow of the particular currency in question. In reality FX pairs don’t really exist (check history of currencies and you will see what I mean). e.g. If the news is GBP related, one must see GBPxxx movements and then pick the best currency on the other side to catch the movements. Knowing money flow also helps the trader a lot, to avoid being whipsawed too much, since he can better see and understand the true source that is making price whip.