An undercapitalized account is not a thing. Maybe an underdeveloped system. Lets say your initial goal is a thousand bucks…
With 500:1 leverage you can start with $1 and make 102,000% the first 2-4weeks. Thats about 100% every 1-2days.
$1020 ÷ $1 = 1020
1020 x $1 = $1020
With 50:1 leverage you can start with $600 and make 170% the first 2-4weeks. Thats about 10% every 1-2days.
$1020 ÷ $600 = 1.7
1.7 x $600 = $1020
We were forced to use a 600 times larger investment(life) due to a ten times lower leverage. Leverage changes the profit percentage directly so ten times lower leverage equals ten times lower profit percentage. But its effect on compounding is exponential, hence the contrasting balances.
As you can see, going offshore dramatically accelerates growth, and the US waives taxes on forex profits if youre already paying them in another country. In the US its a flat 20% tax but even if the other country wants 30%, its still well worth it.
If your current system does not yield 100% a day offshore and 10% a day in the US, then just do this workup with whatever your system’s daily yield is. An increase of 1loss in your max loss count instantly cuts your profits in half, by the same token shaving 1 maxloss instantly doubles your potential. Your daily yield is directly linked to how you do in a worst case scenario.
As for the target I’ll leave you with this clue. I once wanted to know what the smallest number of passes of my deodorant i could get away with, without losing efficacy. I started with 2 and noticed that it wasnt enough, then 4, still no good, then 6 a little better, then 8 much better, then i didnt notice a difference with counts higher than 8, so i would be wasting the product(leaving money on the table). I approached target selection a similar way. I just asked what is it that i want and can i get away with it, if not what can i settle for. In this example you can tie my desire for the least number of passes to a target related desire.
Sharing some details that escaped me for years. Ya welcome