Hereâs my take on tick volume. I really dont see why there is a debate. I guess its just a total coincedence that tick volume is extremely high on every single reversal. (reversal not retracement)
Im no professor of forex, but I have read enough to satisfy my curiosity.
Ticks are price updates from your forex brokerâs liquidity providers.(the banks who do the heavy trading on the real Interbank market). I should say most of the good brokers work that way. So what you are seeing is actual prices and trading going on in the real market. Some brokers have more liquidity providers than others, so some have more ticks than others and show more trades that have gone through. Thats why there is a discrepancy between brokers, thats also why vsa works best with the biggest forex brokers. At this moment, the average tick size on 5 minute bars on my ibfx account is 829. On my FXCM demo account the average is 1941. FXCM is the largest retail broker as far as I know. If you look at FXCMs volume there is a much greater variance between the bars, and makes vsa a little easier. But I have gotten use to IBFX and have no problem with them.
A tick can be an actual transaction going through, or it can be the big banks on the Interbank trying to make a market. That is one difference between real volume and tick volume. There is one bar on my FXCM demo that is 12.5 pips wide, and has 2,596 ticks. It is an up bar, assume for a minute that this bar had 0 real trades and it was all just banks trying to make a market. In that case this bar would only have 250 ticks, one for bid and one for ask on each price change. Sure you could say that they could have been moving price up and down the bar for more ticks than that, but this isnt going to happen between London open and close. In fact at this time, Iâm not certain, but I would say the banks dont have to do much searching for buyers and sellers. Which is why most vsa traders stick to these times. So it may be pretty safe to say that at least 95% percent of all transcactions during LO and LC are actual trades. Especially on the extremes where vsa works best.
The minimum amount that can be traded on the real IB market is 1 million dollars. The average transaction size on the IB market is 5 million dollars. Believe I read this at investopedia, not sure, take it with a grain of salt. This is chump change to the liquidity providers (big banks who are the ones quoting the prices for the IB), who also trade and speculate in the forex market. If these big banks are to make any profits to make it worth while they are going to have to employ many of the same tactics that are employed in the stock markets. The same tactics that vsa sniffs out. Sure there are many other participants, but its pretty safe to say they all want the best price possible so that keeps the market âhonestâ. Just stay out of the currencies that have intervention going on, like the swiss franc today.
Now all you have to believe in is the law of averages. When working with averages you are going to miss some information that comes from the extremes. Which is why tick volume âonlyâ correlates with real volume 90% of the time. Taken from purplepatchâs post with the article on the study of tick volume. Does any other technical study work 90% of the time? The thing between your ears will cause you to have more losses.
Thats really all I got. Call it ignorant I donât really care. I would much rather be in the minority on this issue. On second thought why am I even posting this.
All of you are right, tick volume is rubbish.