Sorry, but you called already victory on a losing trade. So, do whatever you desire, lol. Has nothing to do with my money. I really don’t care. I just share my opinion. 
In fact, I am going to call myself “CERTAINTYCODER”!
:19:
The winnings seem to come from scalping only, is that correct? Because i never see you really taking any trade that you suggested in your pictures.
I am winning from my trade signal. I told you guys that EURUSD will reverse back toward 1.3911. Therefore, I am scalping on the uptrend!
I did some scalping when it was going down with my buy-stop in place @ 1.3740! When it started to reverse, I closed my sell-stop order and starting to scalp towards the current level!
Notice that we are above 1.3740 now!
Direction is very important to my game-plan. Little disturbances do not take my eyes off the target!
REMEMBER, 1.3350 IS THE OVERALL TARGET BUT IS CAN ONLY HAPPEN AFTER THE MOVE TO 1.3911.
Certainty,
Can you help me with your definition of contradiciton?
Is this specific to just one pair or is it relative to a corelation to another pair?
It applied to any system defined by a random underlying process. So, it works the same way in all financial markets!
I will explain later.
Well, in the pictures you posted, there are shortterm trades only. This makes no sense to me, when you always know the direction and the points it will reach. You could just open some trades on it, sit back and relax. Instead you only take shortterm trades while suggesting mid- and longterm trades in your posts.
:40:
sure. And if it does, you will have to change you screen name to purecertainty!!!:18:
I’m on it!..sorry for my late reply, i am closely watching the trade that you called and so far so good…it’s so good i don’t wanna take my eyes off it…
that is a superb idea that you came up with!.. i am opening a demo account with my broker now, they do allow hedging on the same currency pairs…
sir, i’ll get back to you when my demo account is open…
thank you very much!
Ok, I will take my time here.
I gave you guys the direction. That is good news because it means that you can enter on every minor correction and win!
For example, a move from 1.3000 to 1.3100 may not happen in one big jump. There may be 20 minor correctionsl within that move. If you just place a trade and wait, you will gain only 100 pips. I will eat every minor trade within that trade and get 350 pips!
So, I showed the direction; you plan your trade!
You see, I am on another minor correction again: pipping AS USUAL!
Mr. Buckscoder, plain and simple, your style is totally different from [B]certainty’s[/B] style…why the continued attack? Is it justifiable to do such just because the guy is doing a different thing?
Remember, this is his thread and he opened this thread voluntarily. He didn’t ask for you to come here to convert you nor ask you to accept his style…
Get off his back man!
The guy isn’t even selling anything, well if he does so in the end,(although he clearly stated that his algorithm is not for sale)
i will buy anything that works!
At the end of the day, we are all doing this for just one reason:[B] PROFIT ![/B]…[B]SO FAR CERTAINTY HAS SHOWN SOMETHING THAT WORKS…[/B]
what about you [B]Mr. Buckscoder, Schnitzel[/B]…anything to show us? maybe a screenshot, video or anything?
so i suggest you sit back, relax yourselves and enjoy the ride!
So essentially, your strategy/algorithm calls the overall move, then you buy/sell the minor dips/peaks/retracements within that move?
So while the underlying strategy from which you predict the overall move is, for want of a better word, unconventional, the way you trade that, through a series of smaller trades in the direction of the overall move, is the most conventional aspect of your strategy?
For instance, if my strategy causes me to think that Price is going to rise 300 pips, I might buy all the dips en route to that level, as that will add up to more than the total 300 pip move. So the difference between us lies more in the method you use to predict the overall move, rather than the way in which you trade your prediction?
You use hedging, while I would a Stop/Loss below each incremental dip, but otherwise our execution seems similar, it is the underlying methodology that is entirely different.
Just trying to get it clear in my head.
ST
In general, you are not far from the truth!!!
But, it is very, very important to get the direction right! Once you get the direction right, there is no need for stoploss. How to get the direction right is the other key component to my strategy.
So, good contribution; friend!!!
But my strategy is not all about predicting directions. I feed on contradictions: They appear always and are corrected always!
for example, I predicted this to happen to the EURUSD. jUST GO UO A LITTLE. This move is not based on direction. It is based on the contradiction in the chart. Those two green dots!!!
MY account is $75,456 now. feeding of the contradiction fall. There will be a push toward 1.3911, maybe not today.
EURUSD IS TRYING TO CORRECT THIS CURRENT CONTRADICTION!
So far i took in 90 pips from[B] CERTAINTY’S[/B] style…
Thanks[B] CERTAINTY![/B]…more power man!
Btw, i’m still waiting for my demo account’s approval, once it gets approved, how do you want me to send you the username and pw of that demo account?
:5::5::5:
This is the most unconventional trading strategy I’ve ever seen, but the most clinical!
Well, I feel that the market can always throw up spikes and surprises, so I prefer using an SL, but one of the fun things about Forex trading is that there are many different ways to make money so we can agree to disagree on using SLs lol. Even when I am pretty confident that I have the direction right (like the strong downtrend on USD/CHF earlier this year), I just prefer to use an SL as I trade the retracements. Helps me sleep at night!
So you spot a contradiction that you feel enables you to predict a direction? An interesting way to view things, thank you for the response.
ST
Will be fascinated to see whether we hit 1.3911 before the big drop that many are predicting! At the very least, I respect that you have put a number out there and have put yourself up to be judged by it.
:20:
True! The 1.335 will be visited because of a contradiction on a higher timeframe. EURUSD is correcting contradictions on lower timeframes. First one is the current 5mins chart contradiction!
THIS IS THE PREDICTION to the current actions of
EURUSD!
to profit, you must be different!!!
Where you think it will go up in this drop?