Hellooooo. I was just scrolling through Tiktok once again and I found this one which talked about DeFi 100. Have any of you heard about the DeFi100 scam issue? Any of you guys trading it? It was interesting because apparently, it wasnāt legit and that a Twitter user was spreading this fake news.
I wonder how this will affect the future of this crypto though.
@ria_rose, Back in August 2020, BP Member Krugman25 was all over DeFiā¦ The other administratorās of BabyPips would remember himā¦ A bit of due diligence shows he was still involved in DeFi early in 2021.
He still pops in for a read every now and thenā¦ He maybe able to extend on the Fox Business Article.
I have noticed all his website links are no longer activeā¦ Still alive over on twitterā¦
Oh yeaaaah! Thank you for reminding me @Trendswithbenefits! I canāt believe I forgot about him for a quick minute. Maybe Iāll look him up on Twitter to also see what he has to say about this. But how about you? Have you heard of this scam issue?
The scale of the scams and other illegal activity using cryptos is very disturbing. Scams happen everywhere, true, and they happen using fiat money. The problem with cryptos is that they are poorly regulated and largely untraceable, and that is a feature, not a bug. So various criminals take advantage of that.
Iām still here! haha. Yes, Iām mostly active on Twitter (https://twitter.com/krugman25). I also have a YouTube channel where I talk about how to use various DeFi protocols Level Up! DeFi - YouTube, although Iām taking a break from making any more tutorials until at least this fall.
DeFi is a broad term that covers any type of decentralized, smart contract driven protocol. DeFi has continued to grow rapidly and as of this post thereās around $120B worth of capital in DeFi (DefiLlama - DeFi Dashboard). As with anything, thereās going to be stuff thatās legitimate and stuff thatās a scam.
DeFi 100 was an exit scam. The devs ended up taking the money and running.
Thereās a couple important things to consider in DeFi when figuring out the relative risk of a protocol.
Does a single person or a small group of people have the power to take all of the funds? These protocols are all code-driven, so the devās can only do what the code allows them to do. Most legitimate protocols have a āSecurityā section on their website that covers this. Some protocols are 100% trustless which means nobody can make any changes to the protocol or take funds, such as Uniswap. Some protocols use multisigs so that teams can make upgrades/fixes but it usually requires a group of 5-9 people to all sign off on the change. This helps decentralize some of the power and mitigate the risk of funds being stolen. There are some protocols where a single wallet has complete control over the protocol. That means a single person could unilaterally make changes to the protocol or steal users funds. This is obviously the most risky.
A second factor is how long a protocol has been around. Typically these type of exit scams happen early on in a protocols life. Protocols that have been around for a long time, have an actual product that is actively used, and have build up trust with the community are safer, imo.
Sometimes money isnāt lost via a scam, but rather poorly written code that is exploited. The majority of money lost is via exploits and not exit scams. Just like above, the longer a protocol has been running the less likely it is that it will be exploited since hackers would have likely already exploited it if they had found exploitable code.
In a nutshell, if someone wanted to either use or invest in a DeFi protocol itās best to stick with protocols that 1) are either completely trustless or at least use a large multisig 2) have been around for a long time 3) have well known and trusted teams. Even then itās not totally risk free, but the relative risk is significantly reduced.