Hello there,
Thanks for the thought. Seriously, I like it.
I hear a lot of talk about support and resistance levels. To a layman like me, it is intuitively intriguing and common sense in a way.
We have two zones, one for support and one for resistance. The price stays sandwiched in-between these critical levels.
Let me tell you a short story which will highlight my big criticism:
Letās say I have a lot of free time on my hands and I decide to get really ambitious ā I conduct an experiment. I gather 100 experts on S & R related to Forex and place them in a room with 100 computers.
āThe task is simple. I want you to study the currency of my choosing and determine the daily S & R levels. You can use any tools and indicators you like.ā
With great haste, they go about their analysis.
At the end of the hour, I review their results.
Take a wild guess as to what will happenā¦
I will be presented with 100 theories, none of which will probably be alike.
Which one is correct? Who am I to judge?
You may be thinking that, āSure, you wonāt get the same uniform answer, but surely you can average together those responses and the truth will have to lie somewhere in-between!ā
Really? It has to? I didnāt see that in the ā10 commandments of Forexāā¦but maybe I missed something.
Even if the truth did lie somewhere in-between all those answers, that doesnāt help much in the world of Forex.
There could be very large gaps in the number of pips between Theory A and B. Averaging wonāt do us any good because of this. Forex is unforgiving. If I am off by 25 pips in one of my levels, thatās a huge number! That is akin to a weatherman saying perhaps 20% chance of rain versus 75% chance of rain! Big difference. This could cause me to pass up good trades or enter bad ones.
Of course, I am not really being fair. All indicators are unreliable sometimes. Nothing is perfect. But my main gripe with S & R levels is that they seem to be very much manually (i.e. humanly) derived, whereas more traditional indicators are totally cpu driven.
Not that there is anything wrong with human calculation. We are intelligent animals, surely. But there will always be significant deviation from person A and person B. 50% of the time person A will be right, 50% of the time person B will be right.
As you mentioned earlier, it could possibly help us avoid bad trades and reassure us when we want to place an order. I agree with that. But the problem is that it could just as easily keep me out of good trades and encourage bad ones.
If I am going to follow it for some trades, Iāll have to follow it for all trades (otherwise Iād just be picking and choosing which means the indicator would only be used when it agrees with my other setup).
Could it be useful? Sure. Iām sure a lot of people enjoy success with it. And even though Iām bashing it right now, that is only a minor criticism that applies to virtually anything in Forex. I would definitely be interested in trying it. I would simply want to know the best and most accurate way to compute such levels. Then, Iād want to test how accurate it is. Maybe you guys could post some stats on it?
Anyways, good discussion. Iām always up for trying it out, but I still need to be educated. Anybody whoād like to help out, Iād appreciate it.
Thanks,
-ForexPhantom-