Hey fellas!
I really appreciate your feedback. And you have definitely made me think. You are making good points.
To reiterate: I’m looking at past data (history), and lack of fundamentals, and contrarian type style.
Now…with an open mind, I gladly accepted the criticism. But, I had to dig deep to find the heart and soul of my reasoning for a method like this. And here are my answers to your very good points.
Dealing with past data. History.
When I think about it, aren’t we ALWAYS dealing with past data? I mean, there isn’t any other possibility. We have the past, present, future. The future hasn’t happened yet. We’re talking about the past. And the present…ok…let’s talk. We can boil it down to the most fine point. We look at the charts, price movement is happening right now. We can move the time frame down to the tick movement. So we are seeing, in the present, what they have decided to do. Which is something done in the past. The whole question here is where do you draw the line from being in the past to being in the present? Someone can say the past is a day. Someone else can say the past starts 4 hrs ago, and also be right. All the way down to a second can someone say that was the past. And you Rookie do make a good point about price action. It is what we are seeing happen. But technically and scientifically speaking I would like to know when the “present” is separate from the “past”. Because I can technically say that price action is the past and be correct. It’s the closest thing to being in the present that we can come to, in the market. So, given all that, we all are dealing with degrees of the past. And in the market we are all trying to find some kind of patterns, repeatable actions to exploit and take advantage of. It’s a very difficult task to predict what will happen in the market, even when the entirety of the possibilities boil down to either one of two directions. But the good thing is that all participants are human. And we are all cut from the same cloth. Humans are creatures of habit. What we do in the present is what we have done in the past. The trick in market is to find out what the masses are deciding. And again, it’s either one of only two different directions. And that leads me to this most crucial, heart and soul, tipping point, factor. (All this is because how I have my charts set up) [B]I see the currencies move in sync.[/B] When I see one currency move, I see it move across the board. Sure some factors will make it move a bit slower or faster than another (it’s the strong/weak aspect of that). But besides that, one currency pair just does not move alone. The players who move the market move an entire currency across the board. That is undeniable. You will not see a currency move in the opposite direction in another pair. It just does not happen. If the GBP is moving up against someone, it’s not moving down on another. Now there are degrees. Like it can move up 10 pips on someone who is weak in a matter of a few seconds, and at the same time it will be moving up only 5 pips on someone who is stronger. Or even not move at all. But NOT in the opposite manner.
Now that nugget of truth tells me a lot. The currencies moves across the board in tandem. The players ARE moving a currency in multiples. (I have a feeling that there is a lot of linking). One the other hand, what are the possibilities of it being the entire masses are thinking the same thing, trading the same way second by second? I won’t buy it.
And when I see the numbers, it’s just a matter of how much one currency is stronger than another. That’s the fun part, using the tipping scale to weigh each one against another. We have the USD as being the most weighted currency now. We will also have a very weak currency against all the others. And we will have many currencies tipped slightly one way or the other. So my point is there will always be a spectrum. We will have the strong, the weak, and the in-between ones.
Given that truth, we can figure out how to play the game. And everyone knows that going with the trend is the most logical way. Don’t get me wrong, I do think that’s the best way to go about predicting anything. Creatures of habit WILL produce trends. But where do you get in? At the top? I do know another fact about the market. It changes. I see the numbers. (It was very very interesting to go back into history (on the monthly charts) and see some very long trends. The currency that has the greatest length of trending high against all others is the CHF. They have appreciated the most out of everyone throughout the years. And guess who is close behind them…JPY…They have appreciated extremely across the board since the '70’s.) And it only makes sense to capitalize on a trend is when it is in it’s infancy, moreso than when they are already trending high.
That’s what I’m looking out for. Change. When my numbers change from “ranging” to “trending high”, that will be my signal to get in. And over time my goal will be to be able to say that if something is trending high, I’m in it. To look back at last year, I wish I would have jumped on the USD in June. And kept it going till they are not trending high anymore. Which is still going. Do you guys remember a few months back when everyone was saying that the USD is overvalued? You guys been jumping out. But my numbers were still showing trending high. And they were apparently just taking a breather. They did end up, by far, the strongest currency.
So that is what I’m planning on doing this year, regarding LONG TERM TRADES. And I have a list of all the long term ranging pairs. And the price at which they will turn to trending high. Whenever they switch to trending high I’m going in. Maybe if the USD corrects a lot across the board, BEFORE they would switch to ranging, would I get in on them. And I plan on holding it according to the time frame period. Months.
I’ll be right back with some more thoughts, and issues to address.