yes, but there are many forms of Discipline and you are being general
Yeah , ok
but what if the Strategy involved adapting to the market conditions
then.. this would still be STICKING TO THE STRATEGY while also being flexible to market movement
You have made yourself clear
The EA Loses because IT CANNOT CONCEIVE INTUITION
Ultimately a program is written by a human
it can only do what the human has told it to do
HUMANS ARE NOT CAPABLE OF CODIFYING THEIR OWN INTUITION AND DON'T FULLY UNDERSTAND HOW IT WORKS TO THE LEVEL WHERE IT CAN BE DEFINED AS PER THE "Recipe for Making a Cake BS"
this is why the EA fails
it's not because it cannot adapt
it's because the human has not given it the ability to adapt
a Human writes an EA to trade
the human trusts the EA to trade
but the EA is BLACK AND WHITE so to speak YES or NO, ON of OFF Computer Logic if you will
as far as the computer is concerned THE TRUTH TABLE is the word of god and cannot be bent or broken.
this is why this problem exists
beat robots... AT WHAT ?
some things.. yes
other things... Not a chance in the world
Human Intuition is THE THING
and if you want me to define it even further
HERE WE GO
let's say a person is 40 years old
well, that person has 40 years or life experience
what does that mean ?
it means that your brain learns and form Neuro connections to do certain things based on YOUR LIFE EXPERIENCES
These Neuro connections give you intuition and that intuition is fine tuned over a period of time
PROGRAMS DO NOT HAVE THIS
a Program can be fed Historical Tick Data
a Program can find patterns
however, a program cannot look back on HOW IT FELT about certain price movement 3 years ago on the EURUSD and COMPARE THAT to What actually happened
because... THE FEELING FILE is missing
because Programs do not feel, they Function and Execute Tasks
they cannot execute feelings
so.. LIFE EXPERIENCE gives humans the edge
but sadly... WE CANNOT EXPLAIN IT IN ABSOLUTE FINE DETAIL
this is why robots fail when they are programmed
Hypothetically, IF WE COULD
they would not fail
as for this..
No.. Not necessarily
1. is not correct, because you need to define AS GOOD AS WHAT, what particular task
- definitely right... 100%
but even though the strategy must be flexible and thus forming THE STRATEGY
THE STRATEGY can then NOT BE BENT, NOR IS IT FLEXIBLE
Get what i mean ?
because if you bend it, You are then Not Bending it nor allowing for flexibility ,thus you will fail because the markets are dynamic