You are cured! Seriously, your appraisal of the method is now good because it isn’t a wholesale rejection or acceptance. You’ve tested it, found where it works and found where it’s wanting and can now move on with the knowledge you’ve acquired.
We’ve been over and over the benefits and drawbacks here, but there’s something to be made a bit more explicit: besides the massive drawdowns that can take weeks/months/years to recover from (cf. the oft-cited example of the decline from 242 last year), the Loss Leader (LL) is a really significant problem.
A practitioner of this method goes from flat to long, taking a LL position. What are the implications?
a) An LL opens the gate to successive waves of new longs if and as the market continue to decline. So, the trader makes a kind of commitment to averaging down from this initial point of departure.
b) Unless the trader is simply opening an LL because of a compulsive urge to maintain at least some presence in the market, they’re either horribly confused, or believe that the pair is at a market discount - i.e. the Guppy is cheap.
c) This came up recently on a post I left in Newbie Island, probably partly inspired by this method: how do you know the fair value of GBP/JPY? How could you know how far away from an exchange rate equilibrium the pair is? M2P is on to something with his swing method, I think, but for those going long just because the pair is off its high a couple hundred pips? Answer: you don’t really know: something else that is not very reliable is telling you.
d) This is where simple rational thought prevails: If you do not know the fair value of a pair, then you do not know it is cheap. Look at it conversely: if you do not know whether a pair is cheap, you cannot know if you are buying at a discounted value.
e) The LL you’ve purchased is probably somewhat adrift, then. Who really knows why you bought where you did? But now you have a “loss leader”, which implies other positions will follow. They’ll be closer to wherever the pair decides to reverse: but when will it reverse, and how far will it go before it does?
f) If your LL was misplaced because it was entered on a vague premonition of a bullish rally, then you have no idea when things will turn around or how long it will take. But now you have 5, 10, 20 other positions in train behind the LL, all based on that one initial assumption that the pair was discounted. The “value” you got on the LL may come back to haunt you as the first in a series of TMTH. That, in turn, may mean the end of your account if the market drops too far. It would be easy to overextend oneself on margin usage with TMTH because there is an overarching assumption, again, that the LL is already at a value.
If you want to trade this method but have the analytical wherewithal of discerning where a viable LL can be placed, that’s a different story than what I’ve described above - maybe you can negate this problem with some technical work and make astute decisions on when and where to begin getting in long. But I think the idea of tactically choosing where your LL goes has taken a backseat here to a certain analytical laziness that suggests “it doesn’t really matter where your LL is” because the pair will almost ceaselessly go up. Hopefully one can see that idea is playing with fire that can set off a great conflagration in your account if an adverse trend takes the pair down significantly (or from high to low since late July to early yesterday, 1330 pips).