Going to see a Tax Lawyer [CANADA] - give me questions to ask!

Hi all

This site is awesome, so much good information. Thanks to all who run it. I’m new to FX and trading in general but I have learned so much in the past few months. Been absorbing as much useful info as I can, every moment I can, from multiple various sources. I started demo’ing and I’m almost done the PIP school too :slight_smile:

Anyways, I plan to set up a paid appointment in the next few weeks, to a see a well known big time tax law firm and it’s $200 for 45 minutes. I want to squeeze every ounce of value from that time that I can. I already have about 10 questions written out but I don’t want to taint responses with what they are. My angle/reason for this appt is to get the best advantage for my situation, whether it’s being self employed or opening up a corporation and write offs/benefits, audits, etc.

The tax law firm is Dioguardi. I have already searched and read the threads regarding Canadian FX taxes…I feel much safer consulting a tax lawyer for official answers. Maybe I can give back some value to the forum this way as well.

So for those of you FX traders who reside in Canada, what burning questions do you need/want answered regarding FX and CPT or income taxes?

I can’t guarantee all questions will be answered but I will get as many answers as possible.

Question to ask: if I make money with an offshore broker, when I bring it back to Canada, what would be the best way legally to minimize my tax? For example, forming a corporation? Declaring straight as capital gains? Declaring as secondary income?

Ask him about capital loss deduction and how to claim it along with capital gains what forms and when you need to file by? Ask him if you have capital gains but didn’t withdraw that year is it taxable.

If it’s her and she’s foxy ask if she’s single for me;)

You seem to be implying that profits / losses from offshore are treated differently than from Canadian sources. My understanding is different and any profits have to be declared when earned, not when repatriated. Perhaps I am confusing things with the Americans who have to detail their world wide earnings annually.

So I dropped by the office of the tax lawyers and long story short, they laughed and said they don’t know anything about it, all tax lawyers (or they) do is help reach a settlement with CRA after you’re up shizcreek. They don’t offer tax planning advice. So I called my accountant that deals with my small business tax affairs and she answered all my questions.

She’s in her late 40’s or early 50’s and married.

CRA provides the forms on their website. Personally, I will just be handing her my broker receipts/print outs to deal with my taxes as I do not want any silly errors on my part; I’m no accountant.

According to CRA site, any forex gains 200$ or lower per year, do not need to be mentioned on taxes whatsoever.

Anything above, just gets added to your income tax bracket. The only distinction being, is if you trade on a long term basis (carry trades only) or you trade all the time (daily). If you are considered a day trader with higher frequency trading, all realized profits from forex is not capital gains, it is considered income because it is a business, therefore added to your tax bracket. Basically it is up to CRA to determine if you trade forex as a business or not. As a side note, from what I know from 8 years being in the insurance industry, is that a business is defined as any occupation, activity or endeavour that is carried out to create a potential profit.

You file with your regular income taxes.

Once the trade is closed, your profit or loss is realized and will be considered in that year’s tax return, regardless if you withdraw or not.

There is no benefit to opening up a sole proprietorship or corporation because it is taxed the same way so you would end up just giving yourself more work to do, setting up and doing the taxes for a company and paying fees to register etc. It also doesn’t matter if you’re trading forex full time or part time, because in either case, it goes back to the definition of a business.

You can write off things that have to do with forex, like your computer hardware set up, internet connection fees, home office portion of your mortgage or rent, stationary supples, desk, chair, etc.

She mentioned that for the first year of starting out trading, you may be able to get away with writing off all profits (above $200) as capital gains because it is not a steady, full time income (this is subjective, CRA will make the decision in an audit) but after the first year, they’ll come after you if you keep doing that because by then, frequent trading will be for sure considered a business. The first year, you may have the excuse that it’s not a business and that you were just trying it out. But this is something you have to talk to your own accountant about.

Another thing is any interest paid by the broker is considered investment income, similar to having gained interest from say, a high interest ING savings account.

Codemeister is correct, all profits local or international, have to be declared at tax time, there is no escaping it. I have residency status for Hong Kong, where they don’t have CGT and there is no way for me to take advantage of that. Also, if Canada has a tax treaty with another country, and you file annual income tax in Canada, you have to declare all profits even in those countries. Only way around that even in the slightest, is offshore investments of the buy and hold nature but it’s very rare that it’s possible and I didn’t get into that, as that’s not why I was calling and it’s irrelevant to me right now.

Hope this helps out the Canadian babypippers.

1 Like

Very helpful, thanks for the effort.

Thanks MissionControl. That’s basically how I thought it would work too. At the end of the calendar year you’d tally up all your profits (revenue) and your losses (expenses) to get your gross profit …or loss. Then you can have further indirect losses (expenses)…computer, internet connection…to get to your net profit (taxable)…or loss (which can be carried forward to future years and applied against future profits but only to a certain point and then that can raise a red flag with CRA because you’re supposed to be in business to make a profit.) :slight_smile:

That’s surprisingly similar to how it is in the US. Anything carried under a year is short term and taxes as ordinary income. That represents pretty much all of us retail folks. I hold trades for weeks, but never ever came close to a year.

Losses are offset by gains and are carried over as well. I can’t recall for how many years though. Something tells me it’s like five or so years. It’s been a bit since I took my income tax exam, so some of this is foggy.

Write offs are the same, except we can get depreciation for computers, smartphones, etc. where we can claim over the line deductions for five years.

It pays to pay attention to this stuff as it can mean the difference of paying less tax than the guy who isn’t paying attention.

The one question you could ask is whether you can write off losses in the currency market - a stretch but still, take your best shot. Damn, $200 for 45 minutes…

Again the question becomes, is the loss treated as a cost of business or a loss of capital. Capital losses can be used against other gains or carried forward. Read SweetPips comments about a business loss.

That’s a good question. I have a book at home that goes into great detail on losses. I’ll try to reference that tonight.

Yes you should be able to deduct losses, but they would have to be up to the gains i believe.

I really need to look this up. My mind is boggled by this now.

I’ve done my hubby’s corporate tax for his business for 7 years now. He had a loss right from the 1st year. This loss was carried forward for the next 5 years, the profit of each year using up a little more of it until now we’ve past breakeven and actually have a taxable profit to report. If you treat your currency market trading as a business then yes you can.

In the US I wonder if the difference is in incorporating. With the exception of C-Corps, all taxation is passed through to the owners.

My mind is going to melt in a minute here. Taxation is the devil.

Okay. In the US, corporations can carry back losses for three years by revising their previous returns, or carry then forward for the next five years.

Individuals are capped at $3000 in capital losses that can only carry forward until death. Any unused carryover expires at death.

Forex would most likely be deemed as a capital asset because it could be argued that it’s inventory that we purchase hold for the purpose of later selling to the public.

I don’t know how it is in Canada, but here in God’s country we do what we can to avoid taxes by using as many loopholes as possible in hopes it won’t be designated as evasion.

They could just simplify the code, but I’d be out the job along with millions of others whose businesses revolve around the complexity of our economy and intricate tax code.

I didn’t pay the $200 because Dioguardi couldn’t help me, but yea, they kick you if you’re down already getting kicked by the CRA lol. The above info in my post was free from my business accountant :slight_smile:

and yes you do. Your forex gains, minus your forex losses = gross
Gross minus forex write-off expenses = net revenue, taxed at your marginal income rate
Then any interest from your broker is calculated in your taxes as investment income

The CRA cannot tell you that “you treat forex as a business since you trade every week day” and tax every single trade but then turn blind eye and say your losses are not business losses.

Edit: oops, i just saw codemeister and sweetpip addressed this already

CANADA CUSTOMS AND REVENUE AGENCY

INTERPRETATION BULLETIN NUMBER IT-479R

DATE: February 29, 1984

SUBJECT: INCOME TAX ACT
Transactions in securities

REFERENCE: Section 39 (also sections 9 and 49 and section 6200 of the
Regulations)

(NOTE: THE CROSS-REFERENCE TO IT114 IS CANCELLED BY ITD4 #(3) )

This bulletin replaces and cancels Interpretation Bulletin IT-479 dated June
22, 1981. Current revisions are designated by vertical lines.

  1. A gain or loss from the disposition of shares or a debt obligation such as
    a bond, debenture, bill, note or hypothec will be taxed as either an income
    gain or loss or as a capital gain or loss. In this bulletin transactions of
    the former type will be referred to as being on “income account” and
    transactions of the latter type as being on “capital account”.

GUARANTEED CAPITAL GAINS

  1. Where a taxpayer has disposed of a Canadian security (see 6 below) in a
    taxation year, subsection 39(4) provides that the taxpayer may elect in the
    return of income for that year that

(a) every Canadian security owned by the taxpayer in that year or any
subsequent year is deemed to be capital property owned in those years, and

(b) every disposition of every Canadian security owned by the taxpayer in
that and any subsequent year is deemed to be a disposition of a capital
property.

The effect of such an election is that all Canadian security dispositions in
the year of election and all subsequent years, subject to the comments in 3
and 4 below, must be given capital gain or loss treatment and the election
cannot be rescinded.

A special election form (T123) is available for use by the taxpayer when
making an election under subsection 39(4).

  1. Pursuant to subsection 39(5), the election under subsection 39(4) does not
    apply to a disposition of a Canadian security by a taxpayer who, at the time
    the security is disposed of, is

(a) a trader or dealer in securities,

(b) a bank to which the Bank Act or the Quebec Savings Bank Act applies,

© a corporation licensed or otherwise authorized under the laws of Canada
or a province to carry on in Canada the business of offering to the public
its services as trustee,

(d) a credit union within the meaning assigned by subsection 137(6),

(e) a non-resident, or, after November 12, 1981

(f) an insurance corporation,

(g) a corporation whose principal business is the lending of money or the
purchasing of debt obligations or a combination thereof, or any combination
thereof.

  1. An election that has been made under subsection 39(4) does not apply to
    any securities disposed of during the time that subsection 39(5) applies to a
    taxpayer. During the time the election does not apply, the comments from 9 to
    22 below are applicable in ascertaining whether a gain or loss is on income
    or capital account. If subsection 39(5) ceases to apply, a previous election
    under subsection 39(4) becomes reapplicable after that time.

  2. For the purposes of subsection 39(5) the Department interprets the term
    "trader or dealer in securities" to mean a taxpayer who participates in the
    promotion or underwriting of a particular issue of shares, bonds or other
    securities or a taxpayer who holds himself out to the public as a dealer in
    shares, bonds or other securities. The term is not considered to include an
    officer or employee of a firm or corporation that is engaged in the promotion
    or underwriting of issues of shares, bonds or other securities nor an officer
    or employee of a taxpayer who holds himself out to the public as a dealer in
    shares, bonds or other securities, unless that officer or employee transacts
    in securities as a result of the promoting or underwriting activities of this
    employer. Any person who, as a result of special knowledge of a particular
    corporation not available to the public, utilizes that knowledge to realize a
    quick gain is considered by the Department to be a “trader or dealer in
    securities” for those particular securities. Any corporation whose prime
    business activity is trading in shares or debt obligations is also considered
    to be a “trader or dealer” in securities, but this does not include a
    corporation whose prime business is the holding of securities and which sells
    such investments from time to time.

  3. The election under subsection 39(4) is applicable only to “Canadian
    securities”. This term is defined in subsection 39(6) as a security (other
    than a prescribed security) that is a share of the capital stock of a
    corporation resident in Canada, a unit of a mutual fund trust (applicable to
    1979 and subsequent taxation years) or a bond, debenture, bill, note,
    mortgage, hypothec or a similar obligation issued by a person resident in
    Canada. A Canadian security includes such a security that is sold short. The
    term “a prescribed security” is defined by section 6200 of the Regulations.

  4. When determining the principal business of a corporation for purposes of
    3(f) above, the comments in 5, 7 and 8 of IT-371 have relevance.

  5. Where a taxpayer has not elected under subsection 39(4) or does not
    qualify for the election, the taxpayer must determine whether the transaction
    in securities is on income account or capital account. The determination of
    whether a gain or loss is on income account or capital account is discussed
    in 9 to 22 below.

DISPOSITION OF SECURITIES - INCOME OR CAPITAL

  1. Some security transactions are clearly on income account and these types
    of transactions are discussed in 15 to 21 below. For other security
    transactions it will be necessary to examine the facts of the specific case
    in order to determine whether a transaction is on income or capital account.
    The tests that the Courts have applied in making such a determination are
    those of “course of conduct” and “intention” and these tests are discussed in
    10 to 13 below. The factors to be considered when determining whether the
    gain or loss on the disposition of a bond, debenture, bill, note, mortgage,
    hypothec or similar obligation (debt obligation) is on income account or
    capital account are set out in IT-114, “Discounts, Premiums and Bonuses on
    Debt Obligations”.

  2. Where the whole course of conduct indicates that

(a) in security transactions the taxpayer is disposing of securities in a way
capable of producing gains and with that object in view, and

(b) the transactions are of the same kind and carried on in the same way as
those of a trader or dealer in securities. the proceeds of sale will normally
be considered to be income from a business and, therefore, on income account.

  1. Some of the factors to be considered in ascertaining whether the
    taxpayer’s course of conduct indicates the carrying on of a business are as
    follows:

(a) frequency of transactions - a history of extensive buying and selling of
securities or of a quick turnover of properties,

(b) period of ownership - securities are usually owned only for a short
period of time,

© knowledge of securities markets - the taxpayer has some knowledge of or
experience in the securities markets,

(d) security transactions form a part of a taxpayer’s ordinary business,

(e) time spent - a substantial part of the taxpayer’s time is spent studying
the securities markets and investigating potential purchases,

(f) financing - security purchases are financed primarily on margin or by
some other form of debt,

(g) advertising - the taxpayer has advertised or otherwise made it known that
he is willing to purchase securities, and

(h) in the case of shares, their nature - normally speculative in nature or
of a non-dividend type.

  1. Although none of the individual factors in 11 above may be sufficient to
    characterize the activities of a taxpayer as a business, the combination of a
    number of those factors may well be sufficient for that purpose. Further,
    subsection 248(1) defines the term “business” to include “an adventure or
    concern in the nature of trade” and the courts have held that “an adventure
    or concern in the nature of trade” can include an isolated transaction in
    shares where the “course of conduct” and “intention” clearly indicate it to
    be such.

  2. A taxpayer’s intention to sell at a gain is not sufficient, by itself, to
    establish that the taxpayer was involved in an adventure or concern in the
    nature of trade. That intention is almost invariably present even when a true
    investment has been acquired if circumstances should arise that would make it
    financially more beneficial to sell the investment than to continue to hold
    it. Where, however, one or other of the above tests clearly suggests an
    adventure or concern in the nature of trade and, in addition, it can be
    established or inferred that the taxpayer’s intention was to sell the
    property at the first suitable opportunity, intention will be viewed as
    corroborative evidence. On the other hand, inability to establish an
    intention to sell does not preclude a transaction from being regarded as an
    adventure or concern in the nature of trade if it can otherwise be so
    regarded pursuant to one or more of the above tests.

  3. The determination of whether security transactions made by financial
    institutions, such as those listed in 3(b) to (f) above is on income account
    or capital account is dependent on the nature of the account from which the
    transaction emanates and the facts of the case.

  1. All gains or losses of a taxpayer that relate to a participation in the
    promotion or underwriting of a particular issue of a security are on income
    account. Similarly, gains or losses made or incurred by an officer or
    employee of a firm or corporation that is engaged in the promotion or
    underwriting of securities are on income account if they result from the
    acquisition of securities promoted or underwritten by his employer. With
    regard to any other taxpayer who holds himself out to the public as a dealer
    in securities, there is a presumption that all gains or losses on security
    transactions are part of the normal operations of such a business and thus
    are on income account. Further, the gains and losses made by a corporation
    whose prime activity is trading in securities will be considered to be on
    income account, notwithstanding that the corporation does not hold itself out
    to the public as a trader or dealer in securities.

  2. As indicated in IT-114, any gain or loss arising from the acquisition and
    disposition of a debt obligation is on income account where the acquisition
    of debt obligations, either for the purpose of resale or for holding to
    maturity, constitutes part or all of the taxpayer’s business. Such would be
    the case where the taxpayer was clearly a money lender or a trader or dealer
    in debt obligations. In addition, where a taxpayer was an “original lender”,
    as described in 6 and 7 of IT-114, any gain or loss on a loan negotiated by
    the taxpayer is generally viewed as being on income account.

  3. The presumption that gains from security transactions are on income
    account will also be taken by the Department in any situation where it is
    apparent that the taxpayer has used special information not available to the
    public to realize a quick profit.

  4. The gain or loss on the “short sale” of shares is considered to be on
    income account.

  5. When the disposition of shares in a corporation is merely an alternative
    method of realizing income from the sale of a property held by the
    corporation (e.g. real estate), the gains from the sale of those shares will
    be included in income as if the property itself had been sold.

  6. Section 66.3 deems shares of capital stock acquired under the
    circumstances described in subparagraph 66.1(6)(a)(v) or 66.2(5)(a)(v) not to
    be capital property of a taxpayer but to be inventory acquired at a cost to
    the taxpayer of nil. As a result, the gain or loss on the disposition of such
    shares will be on income account.

  7. Although a taxpayer may be classed as an “investor” or has elected under
    subsection 39(4) with the result that gains or losses on the disposition of
    debt obligations are normally to be viewed as capital gains or capital
    losses, there are certain provisions in the Act, as described below, which
    require that the amount of any gain must be reported as income or, in the
    case of (f) below, may be so reported at the taxpayer’s option:

(a) Where a debt obligation does not provide for the payment of interest, or
where the rate of interest that is specified in the obligation is
substantially below the market rate at the date of issue, any realization of
the discount on the repayment of all or part of such a debt obligation may be
classed as interest and as such is included in income under paragraph
12(1)© (for further comments on this situation, see 3 and 4 of IT-114).

(b) On the transfer of a debt obligation, any amount received by the
transferor that may properly be viewed as representing accrued interest must
be included in the taxpayer’s income, as required by subsection 20(14).

© A portion of any payment received on a debt obligation that was taken as
consideration for property previously sold by the holder of the obligation
may be required to be included in income in accordance with the rule relating
to blended payments in sub- section 16(1) (further comments on this subject
appear in 11 to 13 of IT-265R).

(d) The value of a debt obligation that is taken in satisfaction of an income
debt may be required to be included in income in accordance with the rules in
section 76 (see (IT-77R). (However any subsequent gain or loss on the
disposition of the debt obligation is to be treated in the normal manner,
i.e. whether the gain or loss is on account of income or on account of
capital is a question of fact dependent upon the circumstances of the case.)

(e) Subsections 16(2) and 16(3) provide special rules for an obligation that
is a bond, debenture, bill, note, mortgage, hypothec or similar obligation
issued by a person exempt from tax under section 149 or a non-resident person
not carrying on a business in Canada or a government, municipality or other
public body performing a function of government. In certain circumstances, a
discount on these obligations is included in income of the first owner of the
obligation who is resident of Canada. The comments in 17 and 18 of IT-114 are
relevant to these situations.

(f) In accordance with section 12.1, a “cash bonus” on a Canada Savings Bond
which may be reported as a capital gain may, if the taxpayer so chooses, be
reported as interest income.

  1. Where the taxpayer who acquires a debit obligation is the person who
    issued the obligation, the provisions of paragraph 20(1)(f) and subsection
    39(3) are applicable as explained in 21 and 22 of IT-114.

  2. A share option is not a Canadian security within the definition in
    subsection 39(6). As a result, share option transactions cannot qualify for
    the guaranteed capital gains election (see 2 above). The comments in 24 to 32
    below provide the Department’s views in connection with the tax treatment of
    share option transactions. A reference in this part of the bulletin to
    "holder" of an option refers to the person who acquires the option and a
    reference to “writer” refers to the person who grants the option. If the
    writer owns the underlying shares at the time the writer grants the option,
    the option is known as a “covered” option, but if the writer does not own the
    shares at that time, the option is known as a “naked” option.

  3. Gains and losses on share option transactions by taxpayers described in
    15 and 17 above are considered to be on income account. The comments in 14
    above are considered to apply to share option transactions of financial
    institutions, such as banks, trust companies, credit unions, life insurance
    corporations and other similar corporations.

  4. For taxpayers, other than those described in 24 above, it is a question
    of fact whether the gains or losses on share option transactions are on
    income account or capital account. However, the Department generally presumes
    that

(a) the gain or loss realized by a holder of options is on the same account
as the holder’s transactions in shares;

(b) the gain or loss realized by a writer of covered options is on the same
account as the underlying shares; and

© the gain or loss realized by a writer of naked options is normally on
income account. However, the Department will accept reporting of gains and
losses on capital account provided this practice is followed consistently
from year to year.

The presumption indicated above may not apply in those unusual situations
where the facts clearly indicate otherwise. This could be the case, for
example, where a holder of options usually transacts in shares on income
account, but holds a group of shares for investment purposes which are
properly reported on capital account. In this situation, option transactions
with respect to the former group should be reported on income account and the
latter group on capital account.

  1. The comments in 28 and 29 below discuss the timing of the reporting of
    gains and losses on exchange-traded call options while the comments in 31 and
    32 below discuss the timing of the reporting of gains and losses on exchange-
    traded put options. These comments are also relevant for put and call options
    that are similar to those transacted on an Exchange but which are entered
    into outside an Exchange. Put and call options are contracts in bearer form
    which grant the holder the right to sell (in the case of a put) or buy (in
    the case of a call) a specified number of shares at a given price at or
    before a specified time for an agreed premium.

  2. Under arrangements made by certain Stock Exchanges, both in Canada and
    outside Canada, an Exchange may provide a market for call options in shares.
    The holder of the option becomes entitled, if the holder so chooses, to
    purchase from a clearing corporation established by an Exchange the number of
    units of the underlying security specified in the option at a stated exercise
    price at any time prior to the expiry date of the option. The writer through
    his broker is committed to deliver to the clearing corporation the underlying
    security specified in the option if the option is exercised by the holder. As
    consideration for the commitment by the writer, the holder of the option pays
    to the writer an amount known as a “premium”, which amount is determined by
    auction on the floor of the Exchange. Where a secondary market in options is
    maintained by an Exchange, either a holder or a writer of an option may close
    out his position prior to the expiry date of the option. The holder of an
    option may, in effect, sell the option in the secondary market and receive
    the amount of premium currently applicable to that option. The writer of an
    option ordinarily may terminate the obligation under the option by acquiring
    in the secondary market an option having the same attributes as the option
    previously written. This transaction, involving the payment of the applicable
    premium, has the effect of cancelling the writer’s pre- existing obligation.

  3. Where the holder treats gains and losses on call options as being on
    income account and the option is exercised, the amount of the premium and
    brokerage fees incurred at the time the option is obtained is added to the
    cost of the shares acquired. If the option is not exercised, the cost of
    acquiring the option should be deducted in the taxation year in which the
    option expires. If the option is closed out in the secondary market, the
    premium received (or receivable) is included in income, and the cost of
    acquiring the option is written off, in the taxation year in which the option
    is closed out. Where the holder of a call option treats gains and losses as
    being on capital account, the rules in section 49 of the Act are applicable.
    The cost of acquiring the option is added to the cost of the shares if the
    option is exercised. If the option is not exercised, clause 54©(ii)(D)
    applies and the cost of acquiring the option becomes a capital loss in the
    taxation year in which the option expires. If the holder closes out the
    option on the secondary market, the net gain or loss on the acquisition and
    disposition of the option is a capital gain or capital loss in the taxation
    year in which the option is closed out.

  4. Where the writer treats gains or losses on call options as being on
    income account and the option is exercised, the premium received should be
    brought into income when the option is exercised. If the option is not
    exercised, the premium should be brought into income when the option expires.
    If the option is closed out in the secondary market, the premium should be
    netted with the cost of acquiring the offsetting option and the resulting
    gain or loss accounted for at the time of the close out. Where the writer for
    a call option treats gains and losses as being on capital account, the rules
    in section 49 of the act apply at the time of the granting of the option.
    Since subsection 49(1) deems that the writer has disposed of a property whose
    adjusted cost base is nil, the writer would normally have a gain equal to the
    amount by which the proceeds of the option exceed any costs of disposition.
    If an offsetting option is acquired on the secondary market, the cost of that
    acquisition would be a loss at that time. Where the option is exercised,
    subsection 49(3) would apply only if the writer is also reporting gains and
    losses from the shares on capital account, in which case the effects of
    subsection 49(1) is nullified and the proceeds from the option is instead
    added tot he proceeds from the shares in computing the writer’s proceeds of
    disposition from the shares.

  5. In the same way as it does for call options as explained in 27 above, an
    exchange may provide a market for put options in shares. The holder of the
    option becomes entitled, if the holder so chooses, to sell through a clearing
    corporation the number of units of the specified security at a stated
    exercise price at any time prior to the expiry date of the option. The writer
    of the put option is committed to purchase from the clearing corporation the
    underlying security specified in the option if the option is exercised by the
    holder. The remaining comments in the last four sentences of 27 are also
    applicable to put options as well as call options.

  6. Where the holder treats gains and losses on put options as being on
    income account and the option is exercised, the amount of the premium and
    brokerage fees incurred at the time the option is obtained is deducted from
    the proceeds of disposition of the shares in respect of which the option was
    exercised. If the option is not exercised, the cost of acquiring the option
    should be deducted from income in the taxation year in which the option
    expires. If the option is closed out on the secondary market, the premium
    received (or receivable) is included in income and the cost of the option is
    written off in the taxation year in which the option is closed out. Where the
    holder of a put option treats gains and losses as being on capital account,
    the rules in section 49 apply. The cost of acquiring the option is deducted
    from the proceeds of the sale of the shares if the option is exercised. If
    the option is not exercised, clause 54©(ii)(D) applies and the cost of the
    option becomes a capital loss in the taxation year in which the option
    expires. If the holder closes out the option on the secondary market, the net
    gain or loss on the acquisition and disposition is a capital gain or loss in
    the taxation year in which the option is closed out.

  1. Where the writer treats gains and losses on put options as being on
    income account and the option is exercised by the holder, the premium
    received for the option by the writer should be deducted from the cost of the
    shares the writer is required to purchase in determining their cost. If the
    option is not exercised, the premium should be brought into income when the
    option expires. If the option is closed out on the secondary market, the
    premium should be netted with the cost of acquiring the offsetting option and
    the resulting gain or loss accounted for at the time of the close out. Where
    the writer of a put option treats gains and losses as being on capital
    account, the rules in section 49 apply. Since subsection 49(1) deems that the
    writer has disposed of a property the adjusted cost base of which is nil, the
    writer would normally have a gain equal to the amount by which the proceeds
    of the option exceed any costs of disposition. If an offsetting option is
    acquired on the secondary market, the cost of that acquisition would be a
    loss at that time. Where the option is exercised by the holder, subsection
    49(3) would apply to the writer only if the writer is also reporting gains or
    losses from the shares on capital account, in which case the effects of
    subsection 49(1) are nullified and the proceeds from the option is instead
    deducted in computing the cost of the shares acquired as a result of the
    option being exercised.

TRANSACTIONS IN MORE THAN ONE KIND OF SECURITY

  1. It is recognized that occasionally a taxpayer, other than one who has
    elected under subsection 39(4), may acquire certain securities as an
    investment and may acquire other like securities that should be accorded
    income treatment. An example of such a situation would be a taxpayer who has
    special knowledge not available to the public on some share transactions but
    transacts in others with no special knowledge. Consequently, a taxpayer may,
    in the same taxation year or in different taxation years, properly report
    some gains or losses from transactions in securities as being on income
    account and other gains or losses as being on capital account. Normally,
    however, such situations would be rare and the initial presumption will be
    that gains or losses made or incurred by a particular taxpayer or
    transactions in securities, having regard to the taxpayer’s circumstances,
    are either all of a capital nature or are all of an income nature, as the
    case may be, and evidence will be required in support of any contrary
    reporting of such gains or losses. It is recognized also that a taxpayer may
    acquire debt obligations in circumstances that qualify them as an investment
    and may acquire shares in the capacity of a trader or dealer, or the converse
    may be the situation. Similarly, a taxpayer, having regard to the comments in
    IT-346R, may be able to report gains and losses on transactions in
    commodities or commodity futures as being of an income nature and gains or
    losses on transactions in securities as being of a capital nature or vice
    versa.