Help critique my new EA test results

Hello Traders,
After 5 months of working on a risk management mathematical model for trading forex that came to me , i finally found a strategy to match it against and coded an EA that i believe is good for long term trading . I am more of a manual trader and would like to share some of the back testing results for fellow traders to critique and analyze based on their past experiences with EAs .
All i can say about the EA is that it uses 0 indicators for trading and for the risk management model too , no filters , just raw price and simple maths e.g 2-1=1 , -2+1=-1 etc . I am no long term trader , been in forex for the last one and a half years so take it easy on me lol .
Plus i hope other people who have their own EAs would find useful information from your critique too.




Attached is a file showing the EA backtests run on a portfolio of EUR/USD and GBP/USD with analysis.

Portfolio.zip (588 KB)

Cheers!

Good work, thats pretty much what I can say :smiley:
Though there seems to be a conflict between the myfxbook page and the zipped portfolio:
Z-score is 1.84 on MFXB, and -21 in the zip report. Thats big difference… You got any idea how it happened?

Care to give link to your myfxbook?

The fact your EA does not uses any indicator make your BTs reliable 100% if you have used High quality datas

Thanks and yes , i just saw that now but maybe it’s because the zipped report is a combined report of both test results on EUR/USD and GBP/USD while the myfxbook one has only the EUR/USD , thus i suppose it will be different if i’m not wrong . I’d love to give you the link but there is some information displayed at the top of the page that will be a giveaway about my EA and model :smiley:

Thank you sir , i have been through indicators and i gave up on them even in my manual trading . Interesting thing is when i have tried using indicators as a filter on this EA , trades become of more quality,good looking to the eye and emotionally soothing BUT made it worse in terms of drawdown management and results so i never used them in this. Thanks for looking.