I worked for a company that made fake reviews for multiple unregulated forex brokers, today I’m breaking my NDA

[Disclaimer: All company names have been changed. I will not respond to personal messages. The evidence I have collected fills a 1TB hard drive. These companies are still trading and new ones have been created by the same owner.]

I worked for a company called RSM that made fake reviews for multiple large unregulated forex brokers. I have decided to break my NDA and have contacted a journalist in the UK to leak the information. I also have a ton of evidence that can corroborate the allegations.

I’m posting today as this practice is still continuing and the one man (Mr DG) behind all of it has become a multi millionaire from lying to forex traders. I am remaining anonymous as I imagine this is going to create a ■■■■ storm. I also have to remain somewhat vague until this story is fully released to the public.

RSM is/was a subsidiary company to a UK based marketing company (let’s call them RSM UK) and has no formal records as a company. The purpose of RSM was ‘soft marketing’ towards potential customers (public) on behalf of their clients (forex brokers).

I was on a team of 30+ employees that were tasked with sending in 200-300 screenshots a week of our work. The work we carried out involved:

  • Manipulating social media conversations in favour of our client brokers.
  • Creating fake reviews for the brokers.
  • Using the names of the brokers en masse to help SEO.

The RSM marketing team obviously targeted social media for the most part, however, we also targeted major forex forums. Those major forex forums where aware of what was happening and would advertise the client brokers as well as allow us to review said brokers favourably. A lot of companies that were advertising the client brokers were aware of these tactics and were most likely paid off.

RSM also had a team that paid for ‘Influencers’ to promote the Client Brokers. The influencer’s work would include:

  • Fake reviews of Client Brokers.
  • Using client brokers in media (product placement).
  • Creating conversations that would favour Client Broker conditions.

Approximately $135,836 was given out monthly between the influencers. The ‘soft marketing’ team were each paid on average $1000-1500 a month so we’ll say $45k for the team conservatively. When viewing the block chain payments, we were all lumped together in a single sum, so I can see that about $250,000 on average was being payed out monthly for the whole RSM team (I can also see that this was part of a broader $1mil package being paid out monthly). The discrepancies in the rest of the money is probably due to:

  • Procuring more influencers with one off payments.
  • Paying management of RSM.
  • One of the managers was stealing from the company (More about him another time).

Why am I explaining about the money?

Well… RSM UK (reminder; not the actual companies name) between 2021-22 declared around £500k in total equity and has 1 employee. They have also lent money to two other businesses (owned by the same person, Mr DG) to the sum of £180k. Profit is barely made, income was listed at around £2,500.

This company was paying out a minimum of $200k a month to RSM in crypto assets for years, all traceable. These sums and any crypto assets were never declared to HMRC as can be seen through public records.

So, Mr DG who owns RSM and RSM UK, also owns quite a few UK based companies. Most of these companies are small fry and work out of some industrial estate (including RSM UK), however, one company we’ll call CYPTO MINING UK is very profitable. In fact, between the years 2021 and 2022 CYPTO MINING UK made, no exaggeration, over £18,000,000. That’s after tax. For reference the company also holds (approx):

  • Cryptocurrency assets £22,000,000
  • Cash at bank £12,000,000
  • Total current assets are £136,000,000

So, where did all the money come from?

Here’s the kicker… Mr DG, who owns RSM UK and CYPTO MINING UK, also owns the Client Brokers.

These Client Brokers are unregulated offshore brokers and are mostly registered to the same offshore address. They take on clients from the EU, UK and US, unofficially, and globally through BTC deposits. These Brokers use manipulative and often fraudulent tactics to entice customers to use their services. There’s no protection for customers if one of these companies collapses. It has happened before, and I know Mr DG has been involved with a broker collapse that led to US based customers loosing all of their deposits.

There’s a lot to unpack here, and it all feels a bit jumbled. I’ll try and answer as many questions as I can, but will have to remain vague until the story is fully released.

Once this has all come out I will be submitting all of my evidence to the relevant financial authorities.

The TL;DR -

I worked for a marketing company owned by Mr DG. Mr DG also owns multiple unregulated forex brokers that he fraudulently promotes to EU, UK and US based customers. The millions he has acquired from these companies has gone into forming a UK based crypto mining company in order to legitimise the money. I have broken my NDA to make the public aware and will be submitting all evidence to the relevant financial authorities.

3 Likes

Second part of the contract, NDA:

1 Like

The accounts I aforementioned:

1 Like

Accounts continued:

1 Like

Going through these forums I can see that these tactics are still being used. I’ll share some with you all.

[Disclaimer: I can’t know for certain if a user is genuine or not, so please don’t engage with them negatively. I have a huge list of actual fake users on this forum, but will only use recent examples that appear to me to be disingenuous as examples of the companies practices.]

Here is a user’s post about an unregulated broker:

At first glance, it doesn’t appear to be that suspicious, but I’ve pulled it up as it looks almost exactly like the posts we would make.

‘decent experience. Nothing extraordinary, but no major issues either.’ - We were told not to hype a broker too much. This wording would be akin to a ‘4 star review’. Notice how, as we go on, this sentiment continues and then becomes more positive showing no negative aspects at all.

‘spreads are good’, ‘can use MT4’ - Here their now going into positive aspect of the broker whilst trying to appear apathetic. ‘Good’ instead of ‘great, brilliant, really good’, this use of apathy doesn’t diminish your view of the broker and tries to make the reviewer appear genuine. ‘can use MT4’ - a lot of traders prefer mt4 though it was quite common to lump this in to help with SEO. Regarding SEO - They spell the broker as ‘Duramarkets’, not DuraMarkets, Dura Markets or variations there of, we were told to always spell the broker’s name a specific way for SEO.

‘But what really surprised me was when I requested a $2,500 withdrawal’ - I bet, ‘it was processed and in my account in like 36 minutes.’ - The promise of fast deposits and withdrawals; this was used a lot. They want to get traders to deposit with them ASAP.

‘With my previous broker, withdrawals took much longer’ - We would often put down other brokers. We never mention them by name negatively when mentioning our own brokers. We would however mention other brokers when trying to legitimise our own broker (helps with SEO).

Another point of note:

The user only has 3 posts previously and is relatively new. We would often load up profiles with interactions before making our broker post.

Though I don’t actually know if this user is genuine, I hope I can give insight into how we operated as a company.

I will look for more examples soon though need some sleep now as it’s late in my country.

3 Likes

‘Trusted Offshore Brokers’

One of our goals with ‘soft marketing’ was to change the narrative on unregulated brokers. The amount of disinformation we spouted was quite substantial and, to this day, I see a lot of traders who were not affiliated with us using the same rhetoric:

  • Tight spreads
  • High leverage
  • Fast deposits/withdrawals
  • Crypto deposits (getting around your country’s regulations)
  • ‘Have been with them x amount of years’ (broker stability)

As you can see, the poster above (my previous post) used most of these talking points in their post, which leads me to believe their intentions are not genuine. [To add, fake posts will also not outrightly state negative aspects of a broker and will want to appear apathetic-to-positive about them.]

Some of the points being made for unregulated brokers may be true, however, they will always negate the negative aspects of using said brokers:

  • Trade manipulation
  • Unstable servers
  • Lack of protection for the customer (The owner of these brokers has been involved with at least one company collapse)
  • Poor customer service
  • Withholding payments, ‘lost’ payments

These tactics were used across multiple forums and social media platforms. Essentially, if we ever saw a post being negative about unregulated offshore brokers we would jump on it and push our narrative. It even happens on this forum.

I will start pulling up examples where I see them.

2 Likes

A list of forums we would target as part of our ‘marketing’ strategy, along with grade ratings:

2 Likes

On to another suspicious user (I may have to start a new thread for these at some point).

[Disclaimer: I can’t know for certain if a user is genuine or not, so please don’t engage with them negatively. I can, however, draw upon my experience as a ‘soft marketer’ for a company that targeted forums with fake ‘branded’ posts and reviews. This is not a review of the broker.]

I believe the account Paul.N to be disingenuous. Reasons for believing so:

  • They have promoted the same broker on 6 of their total 8 posts.
  • For a new account (first post on sep 18) to be recommending brokers is suspicious.
  • Lumping in a larger regulated broker into his post to appear more genuine is a common technique, I would do this often.



I imagine he works for the same ‘marketing’ company I did and he should have been told off for doing a ‘branded’ post so early on. We were told to do 3-5 non branded posts at least before any promoting. Sloppy work.

As for the broker - I can’t comment on their practices and have never used them. I do, however, suspect them of being part of the company I worked for. Reasons for believing so:

  • The website design (and logo) look suspiciously similar to the brokers I would promote.
  • The previous regulatory body they used was based on the same location as the brokers I would promote.
2 Likes

Yet another suspicious user.

[Disclaimer: I can’t know for certain if a user is genuine or not, so please don’t engage with them negatively. I can, however, draw upon my experience as a ‘soft marketer’ for a company that targeted forums with fake ‘branded’ posts and reviews. This is not a review of the broker.]

I believe the account Alex077 to be disingenuous. Reasons for believing so:

  • They have promoted the same broker on 6 of their total 9 posts.
  • For a new account (first post on sep 17) to be recommending brokers is suspicious.
  • Lumping in a larger regulated broker into his post to appear more genuine, common practice.
  • Very similar to previous user.



Note; I am now convinced that they are promoting a broker that is owned by Mr DG.

Quick one,

Take note of the techniques I’ve mentioned previously, then look at this review:

Pointing out broker stability - ‘I’ve been using them for last 5 months’

Apathetic language - ‘nice experience’, ‘no major issue’, ‘sati(s)fied with them so far.’

Financing as sell point - ‘easy deposit and withdrawal.’

Positive no negative - ‘trades get executed flawlessly’

My previous broker line - ‘I had a lot of problems with my previous broker’ (for some reason we did this a lot, don’t really know why.)

The similarities to how we would write posts is quite staggering. Would be fun to see if anyone else can spot some.

Wow dude. That’s crazy! How long did you work for them? And why did you leave?

So this forum gets paid by brokers to let them post fake stuff? Is that what you’re saying?

1 Like

What’s the consequence of breaking the NDA? Aren’t you worried of this guy. He’s got money and I assume he’ll know it’s you.

1 Like

A few years, can’t be more specific.

Someone high up in the company stole from the owner, ended up laying off all marketing staff.

Not this forum, that’s why I’m posting here first. Another big forum would run the broker adds and allowed tons of obviously fake views.

None really, I’ve had solicitors look over it (one of them provided to me), I’m protected under whistle blowing laws here.

Don’t mind if he knew who I was. I’ve given someone everything stored and ready to be sent to HMRC and two other tax authorities anyway.

Wow good on you. Sounds like a movie script really. Also this is as big a forex forum you can find so it makes sense they targeted it.

1 Like

I don’t see forexfactory? Not enough noobs?

1 Like

We mostly concentrated on the big 3.

This user’s techniques are a bit on the nose:


I believe the account fayrevivyanne to be disingenuous. Reasons for believing so:

  • They have promoted the same broker on 1 of their total 2 posts.
  • For a new account to be recommending brokers is suspicious.
  • Obviously reads as an ad
  • Really? You start shilling the broker on your second post? (They probably got told-off)
  • The whole thread is suspect, will be looking through all their profiles soon.

[Disclaimer: I can’t know for certain if a user is genuine or not, so please don’t engage with them negatively. I can, however, draw upon my experience as a ‘soft marketer’ for a company that targeted forums with fake ‘branded’ posts and reviews. This is not a review of the broker.]

3 Likes

Update:

Paul N and Alex077 have had their broker branded posts removed. It appears that the admins agreed that they were suspicious.


I’ll make sure to document profiles I find in here so we can use them as reference going forward.

3 Likes

It looks that way.

Something’s very wrong, certainly. Since I joined only last week I’ve read old Feedback threads and found that what normally gets removed here isn’t the spam, but all the people who complain about it. Many of them really active former members, too.

They’re all either called Anon something now or when you click on their name it says they’ve been suspended for irregularities or for being sockpuppets or even allegedly at their own request. It’s too weird a coincidence that all the former members who complained about spammers and bots are the exact same ones now banned, while there‘s still tons of spam everywhere. I don’t know exactly what’s going on here but there’s no possible way that’s legit!

He literally said no they don’t.

So you know all the former members are now anon because they got banned? You got all that in a week from reading feedback?

Riiiight.