Yes, I am a “born again,” fundamentalist, evangelical Christian.
However, [U]to prevent more personal abuse[/U], my faith is strictly NOT open for discussion on this forum.
My faith is [U]private[/U], and is to be respected as such.
I do not know how " religion" got into the discussion.
[B]I was looking to generate a definition on the grounds of the Law of Conservation of Matter and Energy.[/B]
[B]I do like to keep my posts mathematically oriented because it eliminates all the ranting and raving to and fro which produces no results.[/B]
On the other hand, mathematics is an exact science.
It requires [U]clear thinking[/U], not debate.
By using this Law we can already start to discern possible differences between [B]risk [/B]and [B]gambling[/B].
We have not yet done this, but the Law gives us a basis to work from.
If we can nail the differences down, then we can use a definition of [B]risk [/B]to now differentiate between speculating and gambling.
I quote from a former post by [B]Clint, Honorary FX Member[/B]…
The difference between [U]speculating [/U]and [U]gambling [/U]is essentially this:
-
speculators assume business[B] risks[/B] which others wish to shed, in an attempt to earn a profit
-
gamblers create [B]risk[/B] where none existed, in order to engage in risk-taking for fun and profit.
As soon as we can clearly define [B]risk [/B]in terms of the law of conservation of matter and energy, then the above will also take on clarity.
We will then be making [U]some form of progress[/U] towards a defintion of gambing, instead of arguing to and fro about religious concepts and who does what.