Hello traders.
I am interested in the chart patterns and elliotte wave theory.
I am creating a strategy based on this chart pattern theory, but want to discuss about it with another trader.
Is here anyone who is using this theory, or who are very experienced with this one?
Elliot Wave has always been too complicated for me. 
Haha. But you might want to check out these threads to see what some of the members have to say about it. 
Is there any particular reason why you’re interested in Elliot wave? 
Elliott Waves is a neat theory but for me, developing these on a chart is too subjective. I’m not saying it wouldn’t be useful as a guide too trade entry and management but there are simpler ways to get to the same destination.
Ugh… maybe don’t trade it? Seems to me, from what I’ve read, most successful traders don’t like it. Apparently it’s complexity and open interpretation means you can pretty much read it any way you want to get the buy or sell signal you’re wanting to see. So, a lot of traders view it as a very confirmation bias way of trading.
1 Like
There is no one more experienced on this publicly, Elliott Wave provides you 80% of everything you need to succeed and is the closest you will get with a single indicator, the problem is in the markets you have a 92% probability of loss 92% of the time, so it’s just not good enough.
I’ve used eSignal Advanced GET and that is as good as it gets, you should be able to become breakeven relatively fast out of the box, normally it would take 5,000hrs, waves and cycles form the foundation of everything we use to trade which I’m teaching a student at the moment.
Otherwise you need to create your own strategy using a custom combination of indicators, even with that after the breakeven you still need the other 5,000hrs to become profitable using your own custom strategy, but that’s another subject.
exactly right (i wouldn’t say “maybe,” myself)
most successful traders laugh at it - vendors and spot forex counterparty “brokers”, on the other hand, love it (no mystery there!)
exactly
astrology is more objective and reliable! 
there’s only ever been cherry-picked, anecdotal evidence supporting it
there isn’t a chart anywhere that an Elliott Wave believer can’t somehow fit in with his own biases and preconceptions, especially with hindsight
when they see an awkward one to explain, they just make up add-on, extra terms to describe it, like “extensions”, “alterations”, “truncations” and so on - all of the nonsense that Elliott adherents have gradually had to invent and introduce to answer all the objections concerning their bizarre perceptions
loved by counterparties, self-styled “experts” and especially vendors - but successful traders not so much!! 
1 Like