Anything that works can only benefit all
1 Like
That would be pointless in the extreme, every single system and indicator
will yield astounding results at least some of the time, even a broken clock
is right twice a day
I’m finding more and more, that above pet systems etc, is to ascertain
that the market is actually going to move at all
thats why I’m very drawn to the Screener, ( and thanks to TWB for
highlighting its usefulness)
When it flags up a significant pair, PA and many decent strategies
will likely concur
2 Likes
Now that is funny!!! LOL!!! Very clever. Never ever thought about that.
Well for the hell of it and putting my money where my mouth is:
I’ve just placed a limit buy order right at the daily pivot (which for me is 1.22925). Just one full lot. I’ll post details of the SL and TP level and how I arrive at them shortly (just got something on the stove).
This is my Dream System
Its like a Treasure Trail mentality, Two Different resources say
the same thing, Two of the very best Forex systems are pointing
in the same direction
How can I possibly fail?
I don’t know, but I usually manage to find a way )
sc’s to follow
I’m pleased you don’t wish to clutter CJ’s thread.
One of us is clearly delusional.
I do read your posts, but like other successful traders on forums
you express yourself in a way that makes perfect sense to you,
but can be challenging to others, or perhaps just challenging
to me.
I will check back on your input on this thread, and if you have never
recommended a cross of DiNapoli over MA, I will take that as a
strong indication I need to keep out of the sun, and possibly even
seek professional help.
but yes its true, I do make it up as I go along. Currently I am seeking
to improvise on your Finviz/Screener recommendations
I make no apologies for that, neither would I take any credit when I merely
borrow ideas and recommendations from others
but to the matter in hand and to answer your question…
What crossover were you recommending exactly if not the crossover of DiNapoli over your coloured MA?
You posted a screenshot in support of just such a crossover in which we clearly see that trading the cross of DiNapoli over the MA would have been profitable in nine consecutive cases
I am somewhat bemused that you would want to deny that you ever recommended such a cross of MA, when it is clearly a very profitable strategy.
My apologies if I have in any way misrepresented you, it would never be intentional, but just for the sake of my sanity, or to know that I am not alone in this Forex madhouse, I would like to know if anyone else assumed the nine highlighted crosses in the screenshot below, were in fact nine crosses of DiNapoli Stochastic over coloured MA, because I can’t see what else the nine vertical lines are highlighting, other than nine successful crosses of DiNapoli over coloured MA*
The only other possible explanation is that you simply enter when the Coloured MA changes colour, in which case you can scrap DiNapoli. So no, it seems obvious you are highlighting the crossover of the two, otherwise why include both in the window?
*BTW on MT4 I have a custom coloured MA but it doesn’t permit me to apply to first indicator data, in other words I can’t get it into my DiNapoli window. any suggestions? it can obviously be done.
No EMA… was ever mentioned… Overlayed the Signal was shown over and over and over again…
It was effectively a coloured DiNapoli Signal Line… Not an MA… I tried to dumb it down…
So it now seems very obvious you didn’t read the information you where given…
as opposed to pretentious? Overlay is completely different
to cross over? Even though you use the expression
’crossover’ yourself? Foolish or not, according to your
screenshot, the overlay would seem to negate any need
for DiNapoli.
If my ignorance is showing, thats ok, I am eager to learn,
and to have my misunderstanding corrected.
if your strategy is above/below 85/15, is that actually what
we are seeing in the screenshot? and if the answer is that this is
not the timeframe you trade, why exactly did you post the screenshot.
It is actually very impressive after all
Which bit doesn’t make sense still… ChesterJohn picked it up and turned into an EA based Strategy in a matter of a few posts… Mate… I was trying to help you!! You tried your very best to make it fail…
Sorry to butt in here:
For the record:
GBPCHF is about to hit its TBPS TP (where I would have placed it anyway).
Order wasn’t executed so no trade for me.
Definitely going to experiment with this pair and create the spreadsheet (if for no other reason than my cock is on a block on another thread to produce a technical trading system that works with this rat poison).
For good measure and after the ECB:
It’s shot through R1 (Wilder’s TP) and is almost at R2!!! LOL!!!
I think I’ll take this over to my thread for now (things getting too “hot” here in the kitchen for me!!! LOL!!!).
Once I’ve got something concrete to report I’ll let you know.
CADCHF has the highest volatility on Forex Screener 0.70%,
Disparity on CSW, and is moving up from a 50% Fib retracement
Strong Entry signal on EFS plus cross of ADX
pity I hate CHF
1 Like
[quote=“Jerome32, post:732, topic:111462”]
even a broken clock
is right twice a day
[/quote] you just don’t know when it’s right! 
Along the same lines… The second mouse gets the cheese…(the first mouse might be the “scout” position we’ve discussed)
2 Likes
My first big win in months, only 40 pips but
100 x my previous position size ( don’t worry,
still loose change )
CSW plus strong EFS
1 Like
Hopeful regarding GBPCHF, extremely high volatility plus
growing disparity on CSW
EFS and ADX cross would seem to confirm
ADX has not crossed since May 6th
I’m hoping, with high volatility and strong £ it
might be serious for once
and not piddle around for another four months like
my last CHF trade
EURNZD has the highest CSW disparity plus very high volatility
Overall trend has been down but with strong EFS* a viable
retracement at least … hopefully
- not strictly true as ADX green should be above red, but
they are on collision course! green should cross soon
I’ve closed my 11 cent test trades, testing Trading Views Screener
for trend Strength and Volatility
Ten of them were DD and one around BE
Fairly obvious you need far more confirmation than that
Even if it does piddle around, the interest rate difference will be a nice bonus and long term, it should go up 10%. The question is whether brexit will push it down further first, I guess it depends on whether the EU are going to publicly state there’s no room for negotiation or they’re willing to listen. If they won’t negotiate, I can see a general election and anything could happen in that scenario
Boris is as astute as they come, despite his past quiz
show buffoonery, after the last three years of well intentioned
mediocrity he might just rise to the plate
I’m not sure he really cares too much about the EU, ‘We will fight
them on the beaches’ sort of thing
but I will be very surprised if the UK doesn’t bounce back, they are
a very resilient race. Even Hitler noted in his book that the danger
of war with the British is that they just never give up
but how it pans out is anyone’s guess as you say
Just hit 29K views! largely thanks to the TWB technobabble
controversy. 100 views a week suddenly became 400 views in one day.
If I were to mention TWB can’t spell to save his life, the thread would
probably hit 30K by the weekend. Its tempting
Unfortunately he can spell, so no mileage in that
I wonder how ordinary guys feel. when they quite quickly become
YouTube celebrities with millions of subscribers. I couldn’t cope
with that, even if I had anything intelligent to say
Best Exit known to man!
Its said that Entry is relatively easy, its all really
about exit
Well I think I have found the best Exit known to man,
with thanks to DP for the heads up, if thats the right
idiom
its very simple, no technobabble, just price closing
over 10 EMA, with ADX exhaustion and very
importantly, Stochastic bars must be the right
colour
Entry is cross of ADX, price closing over 10 EMA,
and again, must be confluent with Stochastic colour bar
Only tested on D1, lower time frames you’re on your own
