I always figured trading the news would be the most rational way to go about trading.
When I first started out I guess I was lucky enough to run into millions of warnings about trading during news due to market reaction to result vs actual result of release. As the months passed I noticed that there was a relatively consistent pattern, much as used has described - almost every time there was a significant news release with a supposedly bullish Forecast (or even just announcements with no real forecasts) there’d be a more or less trickle of bullish build up toward the event marred by sudden chunks of bearish movement sometimes throughout the hour leading up to it but almost always in the few minutes before and/or during the actual release. One would be wondering how someone would instantly interpret a speech or meeting as good or bad until you realise that the newbie warnings are there for a good reason, it’s all just the larger players (and/or a combination of alot of smaller ones) playing the sentiment game, profit taking on the bullish rise and running rather than only taking a pure gamble at the release.
On the specific trade you were after:
- For some reason, the news release actually entails the AUD losing value, like it causing inflation.
Bearing in mind my limited macroeconomic background from what I understand of A/U as a carry pair, inflation would actually serve to spur RBA rate hikes and resultant attraction toward the pair based on an increasing interest rate differential and thus yield for those interested in the carry anyway
- Even though it was stronger than the forecast, it wasn’t strong enough to gain the confidence of traders.
That’s pretty much it
- The market is behaving irrationally for some reason.
Rationality can be a fairly perspective-variable thing sometimes, what’s good news to Australia doesn’t necessarily mean good for aud/usd. The market is driven by people (& robots by people) reacting to whatever event/news is there in order to secure a profit. Given the amount of players in this game with different agendas to get that profit, the rules of rationality in this context certainly aren’t going to be purely based on an elementary good for country -> bull for country sort of mechanism. (Obviously came to that conclusion after the fact of course)
Although I’d agree that pure news trades are dodgy (that is a trade initiated only on the basis of a news release) if you cover your a** well enough as Shr1k’s post, you can do fairly well if the news release happens to go your way. Personally I tend to only use the forecast sentiment (or profit takes off it) as a weak guideline and if I’m in the middle of a trade when the release is due it’s a tight trail stop - either I’m kicked out early or win bigger, not a bad trade off (with my broker anyway, haven’t really had an issue with slippage on sl’s)
At any rate having had my fair share of news trades I definitely wouldn’t have put much faith on this one. While there’s alot you can read and be told about the theoretical concept behind it (usually surmounts in not trading them) here’s some practical ideas to consider that I hope will help you out if you’re dead set on continuing with it. Just to let you know I still use this sort of information to help get a bit of an idea of what to expect if I am trading around news time but using an alternative trigger/signal/strategy in general.
a) Calendar grades - What calendar are you using for your news trades? Forex Factory tends to have a fairly reliable grading of the impact, as a ‘yellow’ report one wouldn’t expect it to be too profitable in the first place. Reading the description for that one: “Tends to produce a relatively muted impact because the tightly-correlated Building Permits data is released monthly”
b) Historic chart data - as a rule of thumb (more like just a rule) if I’m ever going to be in the midst of any significant news release I’ll always check previous releases of the same type to get a rough idea of the pip movements based on mild/incredibly positive/negative forecast & result, both during the buildup toward the event due to forecast and during the actual release, keeping an eye out for any consistent effects (always immediately bearish no matter what the result is can tell you alot). The length of the impact can also be gauged although this is a little dodgy given that often it’s another event that removes or enhances the effect. Consistently whipsaw-prone events are something you want to be staying away from unless you have a very decent fast-order-filling broker. Major problem back-referencing is sometimes there’s ‘corrupt’ data tainted by another or in a worst case scenario stronger news release or event occuring during or around that time. However there’s plenty of previous reactions to choose from for most releases so it isn’t usually a problem. Then again there may be a difference between economic climate and pair characteristic during that particular time to current behaviour. In these situations if the glass is THAT foggy you’re going to want to stay out, unless you want to use a close/affordable stop loss and toss a coin.
c) Experience/Common sense - I think this would be best illustrated by your unforunate encounter with the aud dwelling business
As mentioned above, if there’s another potent news release that people will be reacting to at the same time in the past, it’s going to be hard to discern the effect of the one you’re actually looking at. Naturally this holds true in the present; if there’s two news releases of fairly even or greater effect and the one you’re looking at is the weaker one, you’re not gonna stand a chance chasing the result no matter how ‘rational’ the move appears to be.
I found a good Forex news website and checked out the latest news. Apparently the Australian Construction of Dwellings came out at 9.4%, but was only expected to be 6.0%
If the site was that good it would have surely shown that the AUD Monetary Policy Meeting was on at the same time, something that tends to be a huge kicker by AUD standards (causing ~20-30 pips of movement; that’s 200-300 points on a 5 decimal read as you appear to have on your platform). How would you compare that to the effect of housing starts? Given that it’s a bit of a bi-directional sort of volatility (mostly bearish upon release), either take a quick gamble on the immediate profit take with the rest of your hedge fund friends or whoever they are, or the safer option would be to leave it and move on. Turns out that housing starts tend to deliver a fairly bearish/stagnant sort of result with smaller increases of 2-3% than forecasts so bearish would have been the right move - easily confirmed in hindsight of course.
8.5 hours later, it is down 1000 pips.
It’s a little unnerving that you’d consider such a relatively minor news announcement to have such a potent effect 8.5 hours later given the amount of stuff that occurs in between. I agree with used’s description of what happens in general but definitely not in context of this particular announcement. Alot can happen in 8.5 hours, and this imo certainly was only a tiny contributor to the subsequent bearishness profit taking included*. As it turned out the RBA Monetary Policy Meeting only pointed at future flexibility of IRs so it was more or less disappointing that the next rate hike might be a while off. Gold began selling off from ~1128 to 1112 along with a major EUR/USD dive as it broke right through the november low, all in all either resulting in or the result of a rather significant USD rally (or a correlational move) that was hardly triggered by a sell off from positive AUD Home Starts.
All that is easy to point out during the retrospect and while it wouldn’t have been very feasable (at least for me) to expect such a radical 100 pip move in those following hours while sitting behind your screen at say 2200 GMT 14 Dec prior to Housing Starts based on the news announcements alone, considering some basic factors (mentioned under a, b & c) would have definitely changed your mind about a trade running long
Just out of curiosity, did you actually end up taking the trade?
*Have a friend who was tanking A/U from a ~91 entry months ago so I was keeping a relatively close eye on it - he eventually had to stick it in at 88 because he wasn’t inclined to use a stoploss even when it had gone past 93 - talking margin call