Hi
I want to know what happened why did the price didn´t´go back to the FVG like in the middle or above the middle of it
Price doesn’t have to retrace to fill a FVG before a continuation.
In this case price reacted to the breaker block.
I’m assuming that’s what you would call it based on your use of ICT’s FVG terminology.
Thank you
But why does the FVG doesn´t get filled ?
Like in which cases
Let me start out by saying that I’m an FVG skeptic. Based on chart data, I’ve found that price isn’t reacting to an FVG, it’s usually reacting to a lower time frame drop base drop supply zone or rally base rally demand zone inside the FVG or something to the left of the FVG such as a breaker in this case.
Price generally reacts to orders sitting at a level. Price doesn’t react to an absence of orders where price moved too swiftly to allow traders a chance to participate, which is what an FVG is. Think of it like this if you threw a ball against a wall it is expected to bounce back, but if you through a ball at an open window (a gap in the wall) you wouldn’t expect it to bounce back. If there aren’t orders at a level, price doesn’t have a reason to go to that area or react from that area. If there is an unmitigated supply or demand zone within the FVG, then there is a reason for price to engage with the FVG.
This is your FVG on the 1 hour
Price reacted to the breaker, but there is also a drop base drop supply zone in the same area on the 5 minute that sits just above relatively equal highs (liquidity)
Find FVGs on any chart and then examine them on a lower time frame to see what price is really reacting to. All FVGs are not created equal and many have very efficient price action on lower time frames.