I am considering reading the Book “Trading in the zone” by Mark Douglas after looking at this thread (as I was wanting to get a couple of books on the subject)… I was reading a review of it here:Book Review: Trading in the Zone by Mark Douglas and it said:
Some claims (like the “ideal 3:1 risk-to-reward ratio”) are not supported by any evidence. Maybe that is just a part of the overall pseudoscience entourage or something.
Is that true? I thought RRR 3:1 was a good idea?
The more I read, the more inconsistences I find in advice and perspectives from “Experts!”