Personally I never find ignorance humorous - just sad
This certainly fails to fill me full of mirth - but then I suppose we are all different ;
2700 real people killed every winter in the UK - by your lack of understanding and only likely to get worse !
Your âfactsâ are so far off the mark, no doubt old age is catching up on you.
âIf I remember correctlyâŚâ beginning to sound like a former poster on here from Oz who also quoted a lot of uncoroborated nonsense.
Just had the hottest Easter since whenever, well actually the BBC reported:
Three of the UKâs nations have recorded their highest ever Easter Sunday temperatures, the Met Office has said
Bottom line is Iâm sunburned at Easter for the first time in my 60 odd years of being on this earth.
Now if I have to choose Brexit v Warming - think Iâll choose the heat 
Why donât YOU tell me what the real figures are then ? - Oh sorry = I know you donât actually Have Any knowledge of the subject.
Hereâs a story from Australia - Itâs worldwide !
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o1sH0kqTE9E
But I suppose as long as it doesnât pauperise âEddieâ - itâs fine for others to suffer.
Today even beat that - BBC reports:
It has been the hottest Easter Monday on record in all four nations of the UK, the Met Office has said.
It just so happens that my favourite place on the Spanish Costa del Sol has a different record for Easter:
Yet again, you fail to come up with any hard figures. No surprise!
Have I ever taken sides in this? I have merely pointed out some of your many inaccuracies.
The real global warming risk is thermonuclear warming. While politicians push global warming so they can invent new taxes, real problems and risks in our world are pushed to the side.
Now when I started this thread, it was in observation that the pointless âGlobal warmingâ protests were getting way more media coverage than the Brexit issue, which I regard as vital for the wellbeing of my country.
I thought at that time they were competing issues.
Now it seems that it is quite likely that there is a causal relationship between these ridiculous âAccordsâ which a few of us take to heart and the rest of the world just signs with fingers crossed behind their backs.
Here is a short take from a guy in Canada which rightly links âYellow vestsâ and issues in his own country to taxation due to Global warming zealot pressures, this being causal in these cases.
Iâm not sure it is âcausalâ regarding Brexit although anyone in the uk on âPension Creditâ (and many who receive slightly more) is in severe danger of becoming one of the 2700 who are killed every year by exhorbitant energy prices.
I have to say I thank Houndog for his video which I commend for your perusal ! 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6I4kWZufskk
It is also quite informative for those who seem to believe that our future should lie within the bloc which is currently the EU - Inflation, depression, national bancruptcy and abject poverty within many of itâs constituent nations - those who âtrusted the dreamâ ! - (I cannot put a âRoflâ face here - as I am tempted to do - itâs just too sad ! )
Hereâs a couple of @eddieb (well the zealot website he linked to) â97% of climate scientists agreeâ [Which they definitely do NOT ! ]-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gJwayalLpYY
but these are not quite in the same school as those dreadful âEducatorsâ who are scaring our children to death and creating a generation of panic stricken idiots out of kids who should just be starting to think about music, girls (or boys - depending ) and how they are going to progress in the world themselves. At an age where they should be just âHaving funâ - History will shake itâs head in disbelief
and consign these SJWs here !
The information to be gleaned from this discussion makes the acceptance of âGuiltâ by the West and demands for âCuring itâ by freezing our old people to death - rather stupid - IF indeed you CAN get any more stupid than " demands for âCuring itâ by freezing our old people to death"
[quote=âFalstaff, post:29, topic:211496â]
he zealot website he linked to)
[/quote] 
A well constructed post, but its impossible to use scientific evidence to convince people who reject the integrity of the scientists gathering the evidence. Its Catch-22.
What number ?
Quote ;
_**"âŚOnce we recognise this pattern, we can easily identify countless other examples,large and small, throughout history; from the treatment accorded to Galileo for ques-tioning the Churchâs âconsensusâ that the sun moved round the earth to the hysteriawhipped up in the USA in the early1950s by McCarthy and the Senate Un-AmericanActivities Committee, against anyone who could be demonised as a âcommunistâ andtherefore a traitor.A perfect fictional depiction of groupthink in action is Hans Christian AndersenâsstoryThe Emperorâs New Clothes. When the emperor parades through the streets inwhat he has been talked into imagining is a dazzling new suit, all his deferential sub-jects acclaim it as handsome beyond compare. Only the little boy points out that theemperor is not wearing any clothes at all, and is stark naked. And, of course, thosecaught up in the âconsensusâ all viciously turn on him for pointing out the truth.In the epilogue I shall refer briefly to other instances of groupthink that have be-come only too familiar in our present-day world. But before we apply Janisâs threerules to the ânon-debateâ over global warming, we must also add one more very im-portant aspect of the way groupthink operates which he didnât touch on, because itwasnât relevant to the particular examples he was analysing
.4 The power of second-hand thinkingGreat power is given to ideas propagated by affirmation, repetition and contagionby the circumstances that they acquire in time that mysterious force known asâprestigeâ. Whatever has been a ruling power in the world, whether it be ideas ormen, has in the main enforced its authority by means of that irresistible force wecall prestige.Gustave Le Bon,The Crowd
Janiswas only really concerned with how groupthink affected small groups of peo-ple in charge of US policy at the highest level. But when we come to consider thestory of the belief in man-made global warming, we are of course looking at how thiswas shared by countless other people: academics, politicians, the media, teachers,business executives, indeed public opinion in general.But all these people only got carried along by the belief that manmade globalwarming was real and dangerous because they had been told it was so by others.They accepted as true what they had heard, read or just seen on television withoutquestioning it. And this meant that they didnât really know why they thought whythey did. They hadnât thought it necessary to give such a complicated and technicalsubject any fundamental study. They simply echoed what had been passed on tothem from somewhere else, usually in the form of a few familiar arguments or articlesof belief that were, like approved mantras, endlessly repeatedâŚ"**_
I just go along with whatever scientific conclusion about scientific issues that the majority of trained scientists come to. It doesnât seem rational to do otherwise.
If you read the article in question you would see that the author gives details of some examples.
However, as Tommor says, I too would go along with what the majority of trained scientists agree.
Interesting little discussion here which can be inserted perhaps into the attitudes of the participants in this thead ! 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJmL9hRrpIQ
I donât suppose for one moment that either of our hecklers wiill bother to listen - but am somewhat hopeful that some who may have an open mind , could just develope a taste for critical thinking !
Heckling is not the word for it. For my part, I am quietly awaiting a shift in the weight of scientific evidence to show that global warming is a hoax. I could not be more relaxed in this if I tried, but so far, the majority of scientists apparently continue to hold their position and maintain that this is a real issue, causally linked to human activity.
As I have suggested earlier several times, its over to you. In fact, its not really for you to convince me, its for you to convince the majority of the worldâs scientists that they are wrong and you are right, and then I will be convinced. Good luck with that.
I think heckling is exactly the right word for someone who knows absolutely nothing, but is insistently trying to shout down reasoned discussion .
I simply donât see that I must accept your personal opinions on global warming, when firstly you may not be appropriately qualified and secondly you are in a minority anyway.
Of course you donât have to accept anything. I have no power over you.
You donât Have to think if you donât want to or canât understand.
However that does not change the fact that
